AFLW AFLW Fantasy

[tigs2010]

Eastman or Sheerin?

Going that Hawk dud defender (forgot her name already and don't plan to remember it again) to one of them
Ham to Dowrick
Barbakos to Scott (holding Whelan over Barbakos because think I saw something about Whelan playing mid minutes, Barbakos looked a pure small forward)

Wish I could go Wales to McGrath. Oh well

 

[Skippos]

McGrath, Tamara Smith & Dowrick my 3 ins.

Just trying to figure out who goes out for them now. Wales & Barba two certainties, but I can get rid of Fleming and have no cash carried over or G Prespakis and bank 50 odd k. Not sold on Fleming given only 51 against an easy kill, and she's pretty little. But also not sold on Prespakis's role with the fwd split.

Would have loved some DPP stuff to be able to punt Grider to get those three in, but in a game where cash gen will be everything, I don't want to sacrifice smith or dowrick to tahau to get rid of Grider. Eyeing off Izzy Pritchard next week just want another look at the role. Annoyingly Paige Scott slides through to the keeper

 

[Skippos]

Changed my bloody mind for the 50th time this week. Am going to let Tamara Smith float by and go for a Moloney/Yorston this week for prespakis. Moloney cheaper, lower breakeven, higher R1 score, but I think Yorston might be the play (especially with the lower ownership). Here’s wjy

• Moloney is 27. So she won’t have magically grown as a footballer. And I find it hard to believe she’d be a premium having barely got a game at other clubs for years. And when she has, never scored remotely well
• Moloney played 64% TOG last week and 46% CBAs
• 14 tackles for someone who’s never had Uber high tackle counts seems a bit odd

• Yorston is 21 - coming off an ACL in 2021. She averaged 70 playing in the mids at 18/19. It’s realistic to think she will at least get back to that, potentially more given she should have grown as a player
• always been a tackle machine
• 80% TOG and CBAs - she’s clearly in their main rotation whereas Moloney wasn’t, at least last week.

This could backfire for sure, but I feel like there’s a lot more safety in Yorston instead of Moloney - who could just have played a career game. And everyone is going Moloney.

 

[petits]

This could backfire for sure, but I feel like there’s a lot more safety in Yorston instead of Moloney - who could just have played a career game. And everyone is going Moloney.

You raise good points. The counter to the first would be that she was at a very good team who are often a little conservative with selection, and when she was picked she wasn't getting CBAs (average of 1 per game in the games she played last year). And Moloney's breakeven is so low that she keeps making money even if she comes down to a 50 average or something. I guess I'm assuming I have enough trades to sell her again in a couple of weeks if necessary. Anyway I can't afford Yorston

 

[Skippos]

You raise good points. The counter to the first would be that she was at a very good team who are often a little conservative with selection, and when she was picked she wasn't getting CBAs (average of 1 per game in the games she played last year). And Moloney's breakeven is so low that she keeps making money even if she comes down to a 50 average or something. I guess I'm assuming I have enough trades to sell her again in a couple of weeks if necessary. Anyway I can't afford Yorston

Yeah, agree.

I think if Moloney goes off again this week I’ll probably just go patriokios to her. Or Yorston

 

[Cotchy9]

Yorston in for me. Purely on the higher CBA’s, age and more potential to be a keeper imo

 

[tigs2010]

This will probably be where I lose interest because I don’t follow news of who will be in or out and no teams prior to lockout. But not yet…

Riddell off to a flyer here
What’s wrong with Garner? Spud

 

[Freo_4eva]

Tempting fate.. but.. Kearney and Hanks

 

[Freo_4eva]

Tempting fate.. but.. Kearney and Hanks

Tempered by the fact i just realised i forgot to change my C/VC .. Damn lockouts

 

[tigs2010]

This will probably be where I lose interest because I don’t follow news of who will be in or out and no teams prior to lockout. But not yet…

Riddell off to a flyer here
What’s wrong with Garner? Spud

I take it back Garner. What a quarter.

 

[Freo_4eva]

Tempting fate.. but.. Kearney and Hanks

Yeh i blame myself

 

[tigs2010]

212/2

Never started this well in the blokes one and these girls are playing 75% of the game time

 

[Freo_4eva]

The Key is obviously less research

 

[Skippos]

Riddell captain looks to be the difference maker this week. Would be cheering if you had her. Be nice to get Hanks etc. pretty cheap in a few weeks.

 

[samFFC]

Disappointed with Kearney and Hore last night. Need much more today.

McKenzie
Dowrick McGrathEwings

Go Freo!

 

[tigs2010]

Hatchard (C) should destroy our crappy team
Foley, Tahau, Dowrick, Ewings
McDonald

 

[SELFCONFESDAFLNERD]

Huge first 1/4 from Hatchard (c)
McKenzie and Conti pretty good while sheerin has been quiet

 

[tigs2010]

Hatchard (C) should destroy our crappy team
Foley, Tahau, Dowrick, Ewings
McDonald

First one tick so far. 49 at 1/4 time

 

[SELFCONFESDAFLNERD]

Hatchard & Conti still killing it. McKenzie decent but Sheerin has been quiet. Still, having a pretty good game. From a non-fantasy perspective, i think its been a fairly high quality game too, enjoyable to watch!

Dowrick & Ewings to come next game. No cats or Dockers on field for me. Seth is on my bench though

 

[tigs2010]

Need a big quarter from Captain Hatch

 

[tigs2010]

Sneaky mark and kick with a second to go for Hatchard to ton.

422/3+C.

Now time for a few 15-30 scores

 

[tigs2010]

Tahau and Ewings racking up the tackles.

My mid price defenders in McDonald and Foley are both pretty shit and don’t know what to do about them.

 

[samFFC]

Big guns firing this week
Hope Bates and TLR get the job done too. Ewings wow!

 

[SELFCONFESDAFLNERD]

60 from Ewings and 58 from Dowrick. Ill take that.

Kearney, Sheerin, Hatchard (x 2), Conti, McKenzie, Ewings, Dowrick = 51 + 26 + (105 x 2) + 105 + 58 + 60 + 58 = 568

So that is 7(c)/568

Priest, Tarrant, Eastman
Lakay, Bates, Fleming
A.McKay, Roberts, Szigeti

 

[Skippos]

582 from 8: Ballard (61), Sheerin (26), McGrath (44), Hatchard (210), Yorston (33), Dowrick (58), Garner (92), McKenzie (58)

Schleicher, Grider, Eastman
Hill, Patrikios
McKay, Roberts, Szigeti

Sheerin on the field, Yorston & McGrath newcomers - big yikes. Yorston could be a one hit wonder. Those who went Moloney got it even worse, though. Looking like a 1000-1050 or so coming up