Alan Didak

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

See how many votes he gets if you guys get to play the Saints again.
Bookmark this if you like.

No need to bookmark it...we'll find you.
 
Has anyone seen the Real Footy website today? If not go and have a look! Alan Didak did not register a vote for rnd19 in their player of the year award! Shane O'Bree got 7 votes ahead of him! Unbelieveable! He was clearly BOG! They also run a poll for player of the round and they have Andrew Mcleod as an option ahead of Didak! Are they bloody serious!? How can you not credit his performance! What a disgrace!!!

Have to agree. Didak was clearly BOG for mine, whereas OBree was in our bottom 4-5. Makes you question if they actually watched the game. Every one of Didak's possessions were gold, so damaging.
 
See how many votes he gets if you guys get to play the Saints again.
Bookmark this if you like.

Are you a computer nerd?

You really better be hoping you win it this year because all your sanctimonious waffle about St Kilda being the home of the righteous will be brought home to you a hundred fold if you fall at any hurdle in September.

At least we dont expect to win it this year and probably are playing above where most thought we would be. A repeat of a hawthorn like come from the shadows victory in the finals would just about send some of you into a frenzied state of denial and shame.

I am not sure which would be sweeter, a flag or the knowledge you have once again fulfilled your destiny.

P.S. Didak is going to take some St Kilda players place in that AA and that will eat you up.
 
Consistency. At his best Didak is better but we haven't seen enough of it to warrant him being considered better than most of the midfielders who perform nearly every week. Different game styles so it's hard to compare but I don't think disposal efficiency is the best stat to use. Watson is an extractor and is under severe pressue when he gets it so sometimes it's just a blind kick forward to gain ground. Didak is an outside player and often has more time to execute his extremely good kicking skills. Injury and struggling with the tag for a couple of weeks is all that stops him having a better season than Watson. I guess the fact that Didak has had more BOG's could sway the argument towards him but Watson always seems to have an influence and should win the Bombers B & F. Didak might not even finish top 5, with Swan, Pendlebury, Davis, O'Brien and Presti having more consistent seasons.

You should say "you have not seen enough of him" not we.

I'm not calling Watson a total spud but he is years behind Didak.
Of course he stands out in a side like Essendon's, full of young players he is possibly your best mid.

No
matter how often you say something wrong it is still going to be wrong.
AS for the Age or HS votes, I have not voted in either, who does?

The last time I voted in an online poll I voted Ling the sexiest guy in the AFL, as did the majority of respondents.

Does that tell you anything?:confused:
 
Didak will get an AA guernsey this year and probably Swan. The selectors have a strange MO for picking the AA but the high ladder position will force them to look at at least 2 maybe even 3 players from Collingwood, whether that is the right criteria for picking a player or not is another issue, they will try and avoid the criticism of 2 years back of an picking an excessively Geelong weighted side ( or this years being St Kilda).
 
We will be lucky to have anyone in the AA side.
No one rates our players. F... them.
We know how good our boys are.
:cool::cool::cool: Hot Pies Forever
 
Swan and Davis are montys, Presti are pretty big chance.

Didak wouldn't be in my AA team this year FWIW, he might sneak in though if SJ doesn't play another game for the year and Didak continues this form.
 
You should say "you have not seen enough of him" not we.

I'm not calling Watson a total spud but he is years behind Didak.
Of course he stands out in a side like Essendon's, full of young players he is possibly your best mid.

No
matter how often you say something wrong it is still going to be wrong.
AS for the Age or HS votes, I have not voted in either, who does?

The last time I voted in an online poll I voted Ling the sexiest guy in the AFL, as did the majority of respondents.

Does that tell you anything?:confused:
I go for Sydney, so it's "Essendons best mid" not your. How is all that a response to my post anyway????
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Can play but find him super arrogant. Always think if he had of spoken up instead of protecting his weak Croatian integrity two innocent people may not of died. Harsh perhaps but it's something that has always upset me as one of them deceased is a relative of mine. Might of called those Brisbane blokes losers but what you did Didak makes you the loser.
 
You should say "you have not seen enough of him" not we.

I'm not calling Watson a total spud but he is years behind Didak.
Of course he stands out in a side like Essendon's, full of young players he is possibly your best mid.

How very generous of you. Years behind Didak in what way? Oh i get it now, you are saying Didak is 26 and Watson is 24. Carry on...
 
Can play but find him super arrogant. Always think if he had of spoken up instead of protecting his weak Croatian integrity two innocent people may not of died. Harsh perhaps but it's something that has always upset me as one of them deceased is a relative of mine. Might of called those Brisbane blokes losers but what you did Didak makes you the loser.

What the **** are you talking about?
Hudson was a known and convicted criminal well before the Didak incident, crimes that already involved firearms so it was as if the incident was a complete surprise to police.

Police also already knew Hudson was involved in the shooting the night Didak was in the car, they knew he fired the shots and were already looking for him prior to the CBD shootings. Didak's involvement made no difference to this, he didn't know where Hudson lived, he didn't know where he was hiding, he spent about 2-3 hours with him.

Get your facts right you knob before you bandy around bullshit like this.

And maybe you are referring to something else, but only one man died at the hand of Wayne Hudson, so I don't know what you mean by two innocent people.
 
Can play but find him super arrogant. Always think if he had of spoken up instead of protecting his weak Croatian integrity two innocent people may not of died. Harsh perhaps but it's something that has always upset me as one of them deceased is a relative of mine. Might of called those Brisbane blokes losers but what you did Didak makes you the loser.

OK, so you have hopped straight on the ph to the cops everytime you see some bloke doing a burnout?

he could go onto kill someone with his hooliganism. You better practice what you preach, because we see people all the time do stupid dangerous things and I bet 99.99% wouldnt do a thing to prevent any further stupid dangerous acts by these people.

Didak wasnt charged and didnt break the law. he may have been stupid and naive, but he isnt the only one is society. Have you lead an exemplary life that no-one can make even the slightest accusation?

Are you sure you haven't had a beer with someone that has gone onto do something else in another time frame?
 
Don't know what any of this has to do with Didak being elite or not but your comparison is nothing short of absurd.

if you want to hold everyone to the standard of reporting crimes, then where do you draw the line?

Are you saying blokes in cars doing stupid things dont kill people? and that no-one has ever seen them do that before. A car is as dangerous as a gun in the wrong hands.
 
I'm not calling Watson a total spud but he is years behind Didak.
Of course he stands out in a side like Essendon's, full of young players he is possibly your best mid.

Playing in a bad team makes you look worse, not better. Didak wouldn't get a touch at Melbourne, as he doesn't have anybody else (Swan, Pendles, O'Bree) to go in and win the hard ball for him. Outside players are only as good as the team they play in.
 
It's a tad different.

CWH was doing burnouts and firing at cops.

Helllooooo.

he was firing at a factory, I know that. I have shot at road signs, trees, animals, all without a licence, have you ever fired a firearm? Many have, shall we report them all?

Didak made a wrong decision, but he didnt cause the death of anyone.
 
if you want to hold everyone to the standard of reporting crimes, then where do you draw the line?

Probably about the time when some crazy bikie starts firing shotguns out of a speeding cars window.

Didn't Didak say that he knew he should have reported it but he feared for his safety? What does this tell you?
 
he was firing at a factory, I know that. I have shot at road signs, trees, animals, all without a licence, have you ever fired a firearm? Many have, shall we report them all?

Didak made a wrong decision, but he didnt cause the death of anyone.

Well you definitely should have been reported to the Police and your type deserves to be locked away.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Alan Didak

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top