All Australian Team 2016

Which player is the most stiff to miss the AA squad?


  • Total voters
    648

Remove this Banner Ad

As opposed to those being nominated off the back of two games? It's the start of the season, spare me the 'he's had one good game' rubbish.

At this point of the year Reid is as likely to get AA as anyone else, barring injury of course.

Not sure why I'm bothering with this... but we were nominating teams on performances to date NOT a predicted AA team. Look at the original post next time.
 
Not sure why I'm bothering with this... but we were nominating teams on performances to date NOT a predicted AA team. Look at the original post next time.
What's your point? It's two games in to the season, so your sample size is going to be one or two. Reid was exceptional last Friday with his intercept marking and 60m bullet passes reminiscent of his 2011 form. He played a far better game than Rance, who you seem to have no issue with people naming.

I'll take a quick guess and say you probably didn't even watch the game last Friday, because Reid was easily the pick of the key defenders for the night.
 
What's your point? It's two games in to the season, so your sample size is going to be one or two. Reid was exceptional last Friday with his intercept marking and 60m bullet passes reminiscent of his 2011 form. He played a far better game than Rance, who you seem to have no issue with people naming.

I'll take a quick guess and say you probably didn't even watch the game last Friday, because Reid was easily the pick of the key defenders for the night.

The fact that he's missed 50% of games means he's out. Yes it's early in the season and only one game, but best to apply the same standards across the whole year.

Obviously a side picked now is no indication of who will make it at the end of the year, but the rolling AA in past years has been a good way to keep track of the ups and downs vs steady performance.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

What's your point? It's two games in to the season, so your sample size is going to be one or two.
Yes, and with being only two games into the season, why would you pick someone who has only had one good game? Surely, your 22 AA come from the list of those who have played 2 good games. And if there isn't 22 players who have played 2 good games, then we're in for a pretty ordinary season!

This will obviously change in time as more and more players have off games.
 
Yes, and with being only two games into the season, why would you pick someone who has only had one good game? Surely, your 22 AA come from the list of those who have played 2 good games. And if there isn't 22 players who have played 2 good games, then we're in for a pretty ordinary season!

This will obviously change in time as more and more players have off games.

Does it really matter that much?
 
Does it really matter that much?
We're talking about AA selection 2 games in. None of it really matters, but if we're going to discuss it this early, then yes, I'd say criteria for selection would be playing both games well.
 
Prediction team -

B - J. Gibson, P. Davis, J. Frawley
HB - B. Houli, R. Tarrant, J. Johannisen
C - L. Parker, G. Ablett, D. Shiel
HF - T. Lynch, L. Franklin, A. Hall
F - T. Lynch, J. Kennedy, J. Stringer
Foll - T. Goldstein, S. Mitchell, P. Dangerfield
Inter - N. Fyfe, D. Martin, R. Gray, J. Viney

It's tall.

Jack Viney played 1 good game and 1 shocker, couldn't have him in.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Dangerfield was very meh against GWS, bench maybe but definitely not starting midfield.
Zaka in the pocket is dumb, midfield or bust.
Needs more Scully.
Gray was shit against Adelaide, plenty of touches mean nothing if more than half of them go to the opposition.
If danger has half his games like the Hawks game and half his games like the gws game then he averages 32 touches a game and racks up 33 Brownlow votes. Pretty sure he would make it in the starting side. Admittedly we would have a fun highlight reel of him taking numerous species in the goal square and then always missing the goal.
 
And yet Zaharakis, who has had an awesome start, isn't even considered.
He's considered. It's just that it's only two games in, barely anything that's happened yet has a bearing on a predicted side. I can't believe I'm actually having to explain this.
 
It is a predicted team, as clearly stated at the top of the post. Viney's quiet game last week is close to irrelevant.

Its a prediction of the all australian team if it was picked right now, of course its relevant.
 
He's considered. It's just that it's only two games in, barely anything that's happened yet has a bearing on a predicted side. I can't believe I'm actually having to explain this.

lol, EVERYTHING that has happened has a bearing on the final side....
 
lol, EVERYTHING that has happened has a bearing on the final side....
Yeah clearly, in a one out of 22 context. You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of prediction. It's what I'm guessing the team will look like at the end of the year, based on pretty well nothing. It's just a silly fruitless exercise for fun. You just misread my initial post, that's all. It's fine.
 
Yeah clearly, in a one out of 22 context. You don't seem to be able to grasp the concept of prediction. It's what I'm guessing the team will look like at the end of the year, based on pretty well nothing. It's just a silly fruitless exercise for fun. You just misread my initial post, that's all. It's fine.

You are in the wrong thread then, as stated in the OP, its a rolling All Australian team.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

All Australian Team 2016

Back
Top