Hearing Panther have pulled their girls side.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Wonder if it’s because the girls would prefer their games on SaturdaysNFNL struggling to compete with VAFA women's comp.
Course they would but VAFA doesn’t supply umpires. I’m sure the NFNL would have no issue with Saturday games provided clubs find umpires. Unfortunately that’s the big road block in the all thisWonder if it’s because the girls would prefer their games on Saturdays
They supply felid umpires for all womens VAFA games. Boundary and goal easy to find.Course they would but VAFA doesn’t supply umpires. I’m sure the NFNL would have no issue with Saturday games provided clubs find umpires. Unfortunately that’s the big road block in the all this
They call all be played on Saturdays, just need umpires and play the opposite week on their men’s sides.They supply felid umpires for all womens VAFA games. Boundary and goal easy to find.
Some womens games will be played next year on a Saturday as the AFL Vic 'fair access' rule will come into play ie: womens sport must have access to Saturday scheduling. So some adjustment coming for clubs for sure.
I received this in an email from NFNL.Can someone from the NFNL update the transfer page!
Last few days uploading? Must be hard to do that with a push of a couple of buttons. Thats one off the most humourous things Ive seen in regards to an excuse. 5 Cases to put up into a spreadsheet . Morons.I received this in an email from NFNL.
Hi,
Thanks for your concern about the transfers page.
Unfortunately, the NFNL headquarters has been busy the last few days compiling and uploading the Tribunal listings. This task achieved the FPI we needed to tick off for the week.
We will look at the transfers page next week unless more pesky tribunal thingys need to be done.
Now, back to fines
Yours in uselessness
The NFNL Team
Players can choose to be private which IMO is BS and should be changed.Any PlayHQ expert explain what a Private Player is? I have noticed this when looking at a few teams.
When you hover over the it just states that his player has a private account.
WTF
View attachment 1962880
Opposition teams should be entitled to see who they are playing against it’s absolutely ridiculous players should be able to hide their name. Soon we will see 22 “private players” listed.I don't think it's used as a way to get around anything, some players just want privacy. I wanted to find Peter Malinauskas' stats from Adelaide Uni and he was listed as a private player. Obviously there are circumstances why he would be one, but I'm sure this player has a reason as well.
Opposition teams should be entitled to see who they are playing against it’s absolutely ridiculous players should be able to hide their name. Soon we will see 22 “private players” listed.
Hurstbridge seniors with a "private player" listed on their line-up on playhq for this week's game
wasn’t an issue with gameday.. why is it required nowOnly listed as private on the public site. NFNL, club and live scoring admins will be able to see the players name.
Weak and lazy . Just shows that its easier to see who is in it rather than who the instigators are. I think they need to conentrate on getting other things right first. And in line with every other league rather than the laughings tock of Metro footy.So, the word is, from now EVERY melee will be reviewed by MRP and EVERY person in will get a retrospective yellow card. Umpires will note time of melee and MRP will look at who is in it and issue on the Monday, if you have a yellow already, you get a week.
16 were handed out at MPvLP game.
Not sure I agree with this concept by the NFNL at all.
Melees may not be a great look but 70% of those in there are trying to break it up or at least protect a teammate. What they should be looking at is what started the melee and adding weeks to that incident due to it starting a melee.
Will this be manipulated by clubs who know opposition are on cards and have a melee and ensure they get more, maybe pre-finals??? Pre-relegation games??? Spite???
What about reserves and 19s that are not on vision? Are their melees not as important?
Imagine getting a yellow one week for swearing in frustration and the next week find out you have a week as you tried to help a teammate out, did not throw a punch or anything…..is this really what they want?
This is a huge overreach by the NFNL without logic being used at all.
When did this come in Denny? Is it official or just discussion you were told somewhere?So, the word is, from now EVERY melee will be reviewed by MRP and EVERY person in will get a retrospective yellow card. Umpires will note time of melee and MRP will look at who is in it and issue on the Monday, if you have a yellow already, you get a week.
16 were handed out at MPvLP game.
Not sure I agree with this concept by the NFNL at all.
Melees may not be a great look but 70% of those in there are trying to break it up or at least protect a teammate. What they should be looking at is what started the melee and adding weeks to that incident due to it starting a melee.
Will this be manipulated by clubs who know opposition are on cards and have a melee and ensure they get more, maybe pre-finals??? Pre-relegation games??? Spite???
What about reserves and 19s that are not on vision? Are their melees not as important?
Imagine getting a yellow one week for swearing in frustration and the next week find out you have a week as you tried to help a teammate out, did not throw a punch or anything…..is this really what they want?
This is a huge overreach by the NFNL without logic being used at all.
Complete insanity if true.So, the word is, from now EVERY melee will be reviewed by MRP and EVERY person in will get a retrospective yellow card. Umpires will note time of melee and MRP will look at who is in it and issue on the Monday, if you have a yellow already, you get a week.
16 were handed out at MPvLP game.
Not sure I agree with this concept by the NFNL at all.
Melees may not be a great look but 70% of those in there are trying to break it up or at least protect a teammate. What they should be looking at is what started the melee and adding weeks to that incident due to it starting a melee.
Will this be manipulated by clubs who know opposition are on cards and have a melee and ensure they get more, maybe pre-finals??? Pre-relegation games??? Spite???
What about reserves and 19s that are not on vision? Are their melees not as important?
Imagine getting a yellow one week for swearing in frustration and the next week find out you have a week as you tried to help a teammate out, did not throw a punch or anything…..is this really what they want?
This is a huge overreach by the NFNL without logic being used at all.
When did this come in Denny? Is it official or just discussion you were told somewhere?
I would have thought that any rule change this significant would need to be discussed with clubs for feedback so we can get everyone onboard and an agreed to roll out.
You are not sure you agree with this rubbish??So, the word is, from now EVERY melee will be reviewed by MRP and EVERY person in will get a retrospective yellow card. Umpires will note time of melee and MRP will look at who is in it and issue on the Monday, if you have a yellow already, you get a week.
16 were handed out at MPvLP game.
Not sure I agree with this concept by the NFNL at all.
Melees may not be a great look but 70% of those in there are trying to break it up or at least protect a teammate. What they should be looking at is what started the melee and adding weeks to that incident due to it starting a melee.
Will this be manipulated by clubs who know opposition are on cards and have a melee and ensure they get more, maybe pre-finals??? Pre-relegation games??? Spite???
What about reserves and 19s that are not on vision? Are their melees not as important?
Imagine getting a yellow one week for swearing in frustration and the next week find out you have a week as you tried to help a teammate out, did not throw a punch or anything…..is this really what they want?
This is a huge overreach by the NFNL without logic being used at all.