Anthony Albanese - How long? -3-

[Bloods86]

Nah just sick of the cheerleading posts. Good to try and bring some balance to what is known as a left wing forum

Yes, the fact you characterise the thread as just cheerleading, is why you may want to improve your reading.

Of course, you could be deliberately ignoring the content and context of posts, and just stirring the pot to amuse yourself, but I wouldn't want to assume poor character.

 

[Jane Doe]

Yes, the fact you characterise the thread as just cheerleading, is why you may want to improve your reading.

Of course, you could be deliberately ignoring the content and context of posts, and just stirring the pot to amuse yourself, but I wouldn't want to assume poor character.

Oh you are so wise and know everything. Should I bow down to your so called superior intelligence?

 

[Bloods86]

Oh you are so wise and know everything. Should I bow down to your so called superior intelligence?

No.

It'd just be nice if you read posts instead of chiming in with blanket statements based on your imagination.

 

[Gethelred]

I have clearly said I think it should be investigated and I'm content with the PM just being lucky, not that he is some conniving masterful schemer.

Just consider that you're requiring a stay at home mother to go and do the investigative journalism in order to discuss that something looks very convenient for a public servant making a lot of money.

Empower me to require records to be revealed to the public and I will do all the reading, but you're not in a position to do that.

Tayl0r, I'm asking you to actually make the claim you're doing everything not to say. You are on this forum: you looked in here and wrote posts of your own volition.

It's genuinely none of my business whether you're a stay at home mother or not. Own your posting.

And let's not affect the pretense that this post:

I prefer to think of it that the guy who holds the highest elected office in the land wasn't smart enough to see where funding was earmarked which would improve the value of property, and by pure dumb luck made that purchase.

That makes me feel better.

... wasn't at least in part tongue in cheek. You knew what you were saying, and all the faux obliviousness in the world can't take it back.

 

[Taylor]

Tayl0r, I'm asking you to actually make the claim you're doing everything not to say. You are on this forum: you looked in here and wrote posts of your own volition.

It's genuinely none of my business whether you're a stay at home mother or not. Own your posting.

And let's not affect the pretense that this post:

... wasn't at least in part tongue in cheek. You knew what you were saying, and all the obliviousness in the world can take it back.

I have been quite clear. I think it warrants looking into and I am content if the findings of that were that the guy elected to top office didn't use that influence or reach of his department to make a decision he massively benefited from and instead just fell arse backwards into it through dumb luck.

To be clear to all with a functioning brain, I think it is convenient enough that it deserves investigation. I think anyone who doesn't is afraid of what it might turn up.

 

[Gethelred]

I have been quite clear.

Your posting has been clear as mud, as usual.

I think it warrants looking into and I am content if the findings of that were that the guy elected to top office didn't use that influence or reach of his department to make a decision he massively benefited from and instead just fell arse backwards into it through dumb luck.

To be clear to all with a functioning brain, I think it is convenient enough that it deserves investigation. I think anyone who doesn't is afraid of what it might turn up.

I have no issue with an inquiry into it, even if I think it'd be a waste of money doing so because - as stated above by me - road upgrades are state responsibilities, not federal ones.

There's also the fact that this forum runs on facts, not vibes. If you're going to accuse the PM of insider trading, you'd better have a reasonable pretext for doing so beyond 'that isn't a good look.'

 

[geoffjennings79]

No.

It'd just be nice if you read posts instead of chiming in with blanket statements based on your imagination.

Don't bother, save yourself the time.

That poster's skill set doesn't actually extend beyond hitting the laugh emoji. Never once engages in actual discussion. I think your assessment of them being a child is pretty accurate.

 

[Deliverance]

The house was one thing…the million dollar upgrades to the road that leads to it … that doesn’t pass the sniff test

It was a typical wasteful election promise, that both sides do. No idea if he bought the house before the election promise or not. Not like the LNP are any better, worse if anything. They've disproportionately promised Qld road funding as its such a key state over past elections. Also weakened the Infrastructure Australia scrutiny standards.

 

[Jane Doe]

Don't bother, save yourself the time.

That poster's skill set doesn't actually extend beyond hitting the laugh emoji. Never once engages in actual discussion. I think your assessment of them being a child is pretty accurate.

No I just think its hilarious that you have blind loyalty to Albanese and the labor party and you think he is doing such an outstanding job.

 

[Vindicater]

No I just think its hilarious that you have blind loyalty to Albanese and the labor party and you think he is doing such an outstanding job.

And we all think it is hilarious that you have blind loyalty to Dutton and the liberal party and you think he is doing such an outstanding job.

 

[Jane Doe]

And we all think it is hilarious that you have blind loyalty to Dutton and the liberal party and you think he is doing such an outstanding job.

No not at all. I just think there needs to be some balance on here. Do you honestly think Albanese is doing a good job?

 

[peetoo]

There is balance, but it’s this forums version of balance not what an individual thinks it should be

 

[Johnny Bananas]

Albanese’s inaction drives his own party towards extinction

Under Anthony Albanese, Labor gives the ever stronger impression that it has never seen a corporation that it won’t prostrate itself to.

www.brisbanetimes.com.au

Truly excellent article from 9fax. Albanese is a corporatist and an environmental vandal, just less of both than the hideous LNP.

 

[peetoo]

Albanese’s inaction drives his own party towards extinction

Under Anthony Albanese, Labor gives the ever stronger impression that it has never seen a corporation that it won’t prostrate itself to.

www.brisbanetimes.com.au

Truly excellent article from 9fax. Albanese is a corporatist and an environmental vandal, just less of both than the hideous LNP.

Thats a very inventive take given:

AUS coalition vote split with teals taking moderate seats
UK right wing vote split between Tories and Reform
US right side with unholy alliance between MAGA, tech and republicans ‘wait 4 years’

 

[Johnny Bananas]

Thats a very inventive take given:

AUS coalition vote split with teals taking moderate seats
UK right wing vote split between Tories and Reform
US right side with unholy alliance between MAGA, tech and republicans ‘wait 4 years’

Did you quote the wrong post or something? This is a non-sequitur, the article is about Albanese, not the right wing anywhere.

 

[Gough]

As disappointing as Albo has been you can't vote for an opposition that has free business lunches and nuclear power as their only policies.

 

[Vindicater]

No not at all. I just think there needs to be some balance on here. Do you honestly think Albanese is doing a good job?

No I don't think he is doing a good job.

I just think Dutton would do even worse.

 

[Johnny Bananas]

As disappointing as Albo has been you can't vote for an opposition that has free business lunches and nuclear power as their only policies.

Oh of course, but neither does Labor deserve your first preference vote, especially in the Senate.

 

[Vindicater]

My personal preference would be for both Labor and Coalition to lose a couple more seats to some independents/minor parties.

Thus pushing Labor into minority government and the coalition into obscurity.

 

[Gough]

Oh of course, but neither does Labor deserve your first preference vote, especially in the Senate.

It's been a long time since I voted Labor.

 

[Kram]

Losing to Dutton after 1 term would go down as one of history's most embarrassing political defeats.

 

[nut]

No I just think its hilarious that you have blind loyalty to Albanese and the labor party and you think he is doing such an outstanding job.

What specific policies do you think the Labor party has failed in?

 

[Jane Doe]

What specific policies do you think the Labor party has failed in?

If your beloved prime minister is doing such an outstanding job why is on the nose with so many people? Can you enlighten me?

 

[nut]

If your beloved prime minister is doing such an outstanding job why is on the nose with so many people? Can you enlighten me?

Is this the standard answer? Albo is doing a terrible job because the polls says so…
Do you have a brain? Can you form you own opinion?

What specific policies do you think the Labor party has failed in?

 

[Jane Doe]

Is this the standard answer? Albo is doing a terrible job because the polls says so…
Do you have a brain? Can you form you own opinion?

What specific policies do you think the Labor party has failed in?

Maybe leave the leafy inner suburbs and ask people in the mortgage belt areas how they are travelling? You do remeber old mate said everything would be alot easier under an Albanese government? In my 50 years I don't think I have encounted a more out of touch prime minister.