Ugh that 2019 line still makes me feel physically ill. I can't even read the rest after seeing it and being reminded of what happened that year. Such an absolutely disgusting disgrace to the club that it was allowed to happen.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think there is a difference between great player and great captain. For example, Wangas was a great player, not really a great Captain.
Following Primus and Tredders was a tough ask as they were great at both. Cassisi did the best he could in the circumstances he was in, as mentioned by others, and, without knowing the locker room, what felt like the best option.
Cassisi played with his head caved in, he was Port Adelaide through and through and a good leader, he just was when we were running on fumes.
You are right on the money re expanded All Australian squads and the final selection process, Tom Jonas at his best was never much more than a `serviceable' role player, and that `best' form has been disappearing into the rear view mirror at a rate of knots for at least a couple of seasons now.Jonas was serviceable through to 2020, but he's been s**t since then, worse year on year. He should have clearly been removed as Captain end of 2021, but of course that'd reflect on Ken, so 'Wooahh, no siree, not at the Ken Hinkley Football Club!'.
As noted I think he was serviceable, but I think his making the AA squad I think is a bit deceptive. The AA squad (rather than just AA team) serves a few purposes. Obviously to try and generate interest (money) in 'Will my teams player make it?'. One of the unsaid reasons, IMO, though is it exists as much to reward teams as players. E.g. Port has generally had an (on-paper) decent defense, if you just look at points conceded (and ignore everything else). As it's been from overloading it and dragging it into a slugfest often, no players have generally stood out, but hey it's conceded little. So the AA squad (as opposed to team), allows them to pick a Port defender to go there as the 'here you go Port fans', without him ever under real consideration for a spot. Other teams / positions / players have similarly made the squads, rather than teams, since the expanded list, but Jonas is the obvious Port inclusion for this 'team reward'.
I was looking at past Port Adelaide captains of the past 60 years and I truly believe that Jonas and Cassisi would not be fit to tie the shoelaces of any of the previous captains listed.
By far are the 2 worst on the list.
Am I being biased?
He did want it, and he probably should have got it, but the follow up behaviour and abandonment of the club because of it was pretty rubbish and that's light compared to how I felt when it all occured.This is an interesting one. Did Shaun really want the responsibility? He certainly didn't want the responsibility of being our best midfielder, and traded that in to play a less accountable halfback role at the Hawks. I'd love to see the alternate universe where he was made captain, I suspect he still would have left.
Best thing he ever did.I don't think Jonas has ever been the same footballer since the Gaff incident,
The old Port Adelaide was a big in the little SANFL pond.Depends how you define a good Captain. Cassisi was what he was, a solid player who gave 100% and I cannot fault that. Tbh I was never that impressed by Gavin Wanganeen as a Captain and I thought Matty Primus was a much better choice.
For a while the Captaincy was a poisoned chalice for Port in the AFL. Wanganeen, Primus and Tredrea all suffered injury as soon as they were given the Captaincy.
Tom Jonas has had his good years at Port and when he was given the Captaincy his form was not that bad it is only in the last few years that it has slipped.
I am not sure about the purpose of this thread as the Captaincy is not the real issue and if we changed Captains overnight it would not change a lot as the same bloke would be calling the shots. I think Tom Jonas' time will be up at the end of this season and I hope the same applies to the Coach.
Leaders aren't always well liked. They are who you want leading the charge when shit hits the fan. I think Jonas meets this description.I always think - why do our players never mention Jonas as someone they look up to and want as a mentor?
As a young player, if you want to be a successful athlete, you model yourself on players like Boak, Petracca, Fyfe, Pendles (to name a few) that act professional. That lead by example on and off the field.
So why do the players continue to support Jonas each year with leading the team. Baffles me
The old Port Adelaide was a big in the little SANFL pond.
We existed to win premierships and often did.
Reminiscing the good old days if fine but we need a reality check.
Where we are no longer the big fish and are swimming with the sharks.
And pretty soon us good old boys reminiscing the good old days will no longer be around.
Suggesting Jonas is a dud Captain as compared to our SANFL glory days does not help anyone.
We need to be more realistic with not crucify our future supporters and members with false flag expectations.
Clubs like the Saints have won only one flag, the Bulldogs waited for 60 years.
Heck, even the Cats who defeated us and have much recent success has to wait 44 years.
To bring in a new supporter base we should focus more post 1997.
If anything, we underachieved; at the turn of the century Tredders was the best player in the comp and we should have won more than one Granny. Where Primus was a far, far better Captain than Warren was; albeit, Tredeers has the honour of holding up our one & only AFL cup.
What goes around, comes around, we are building and will get our lick at another grannie soon.
A brownlow medallist...Throw Wines in as well
And this individual award makes him a good captain?A brownlow medallist...
And this individual award makes him a good captain?
Not sure the "win streak" matters here as the comment you've pulled me up on pre-dates it. FWIW, my opinion of his leadership hasn't changed.Not on its own, no. But for me, the type of player you are, and your accomplishments is important in being captain. Cassisi was a good solid player, but the role he played etc didn't scream captain to me. Jonas has always been a no nonsense defender who puts his body on the line for the team every week - players will play for him because they know that. Wines is no different. He also gets additional respect for being a brownlow medallist.
Wines has also never been a stand alone captain in his own right, so I'm not sure why you're saying he's not a good captain.
He has been acting captain though during most of our winning streak - and I didn't see anything to suggest he deserves to be marked as a poor captain.
Boaky at age 30, stepped down from the captaincy in 2018
and is still playing 2023.
Imagine if he never stood down. Jonas was his deputy instead.
Where would Boak then stand among Port captains?
This is the much more important discussion, the captains is a subset of it.We didn’t win because we were a big fish, we were a big fish because we won premierships. And we won premierships because we made it our singular focus no matter the cost. Everyone at the club was expected to be the best at their role and adhere to the Creed and if you didn’t, you were moved on quickly. We had the most supporters in the SANFL because we won all the time, despite sharing a very crowded Western suburbs catchment area.
This is absolutely not a dig at Jonas because every player is a product of their environment to some degree, even culturally transformative leaders like Luke Hodge or Fos Williams. Would the likes of Tim Ginever or Greg Phillips have been such great leaders if they played for South Adelaide and were brought up under that culture? Probably, but it’s hard to say because they were immersed in that culture from the very beginning of their careers. The culture comes from the top down.
We don’t have to “wait our turn”, we can win flags in every decade like Hawthorn if we adopt the right behaviours. Further, assuming that if we wait our time will come is a furphy, it might not come. St Kilda have 1 flag in 126 years of V/AFL footy. I don’t need to tell you the behaviours we need to adopt, because the greatest leader in the history of our club wrote a Creed that spells it out better than anyone before or since. We have to live and breathe winning, we have to remove people from our club for whom winning premierships isn’t priority 1, 2 and 3. This is especially true in leadership positions, from the Chairman and CEO down.
If you believe you’re a little club who is a small fish swimming with sharks, you’ll give yourself that excuse year in year out and you’ll never win anything.
Further, the idea that we need to ignore our history to grow our supporter base is a complete misunderstanding of sports marketing and how it works. We of all clubs know that better than anyone. We almost died as a club when ignoring our history and we’ve dramatically increased in engagement when embracing it.
We can’t grow our supporter base meaningfully through marketing or branding. Only 2 things will grow our supporter base, population increase in our catchment area, and winning. Winning is everything. Marketing isn’t to attract new supporters, it’s to make the existing supporter base feel engaged enough to attend games and put money into the club. Abandoning a club’s heritage has never engaged a supporter base in the history of sport.
Depends how many flags we wonBoaky at age 30, stepped down from the captaincy in 2018
and is still playing 2023.
Imagine if he never stood down. Jonas was his deputy instead.
Where would Boak then stand among Port captains?