Current Aussie woman caught with 5.8kg of charlie at Colombia airport

Remove this Banner Ad

18222711_1361129167328077_7005077348712378050_n.jpg
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Maybe there's a good get-rich-scheme in play here:-

Set up the least-liked and stupid member of the family as a drug mule.

If they get away with it - profit $$$$$$$$.

If they get caught - 'Oh No!', tears, cries for help, 60 Minutes, Women's weekly - profit $$$$. (Plus you don't have to deal with annoying family member for a few years).
 
Well, let's see how they use the money....


It would be a problem’: Legal concerns around family’s Cocaine Cassie tell-all
PAUL TOOHEY, News Corp Australia Network

THE family of Cassie Sainsbury must ensure any money paid to them by 60 Minutes does not commercially benefit the accused drug smuggler, otherwise Australian Federal Police could seize it under proceeds-of-crime law.

With reports that Sainsbury’s sister Khala and mother Lisa Evans have negotiated a high and undisclosed fee to travel to Colombia, with a view to filming an exclusive with Sainsbury in her Bogota prison, they are entering a grey area of the law.

Legal specialists said the AFP could apply for a restraining order on any funds paid by 60 Minutes and seek its forfeiture even before Sainsbury faced court, if they believed the money would benefit her.

That could include paying Sainsbury’s legal fees, putting money aside for her later release, paying her debts, seeking independent psychiatric advice, hiring a private detective to investigate the case, or paying to upgrade her life in prison.

“It would be a problem if they received money and used it to fund her legal expenses, for example. The money would need to be quarantined and not flow through to Cassie, because as soon as it does, it creates an opening for the AFP.”

However, if the family used the money only to travel back and forth to Colombia to give emotional support to Sainsbury, it would unlikely attract AFP interest.

The Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 identifies “literary” proceeds as payments for books or media interviews, and the AFP does not require a person to be convicted to act.

The AFP could apply for a restraining order on funds if they believed Sainsbury was “on the balance of probabilities” guilty, and would benefit from 60 Minutes’ money.


Full Article

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/na...l/news-story/f7d4fb43875684db8dbb18106d3eb95d
 
Last edited:
Not to mention the fact that she's applied to have the Australian Government cover part of her lawyer fees (which while is her right as an Australian citizen, seems like a bit of an injustice and a huge waste of money)
Whether it is a huge waste of money or not , all they will mostly be doing is seeing that everything is done above board and that she is safe, they will be also trying to make a deal where she serves her sentence in Australia.

While I don't agree with the crime she is charged with I would hope that if any of my family were caught in this situation the Consulate was doing as much as they could
 
Well, let's see how they use the money....


It would be a problem’: Legal concerns around family’s Cocaine Cassie tell-all
PAUL TOOHEY, News Corp Australia Network

THE family of Cassie Sainsbury must ensure any money paid to them by 60 Minutes does not commercially benefit the accused drug smuggler, otherwise Australian Federal Police could seize it under proceeds-of-crime law.

With reports that Sainsbury’s sister Khala and mother Lisa Evans have negotiated a high and undisclosed fee to travel to Colombia, with a view to filming an exclusive with Sainsbury in her Bogota prison, they are entering a grey area of the law.

Legal specialists said the AFP could apply for a restraining order on any funds paid by 60 Minutes and seek its forfeiture even before Sainsbury faced court, if they believed the money would benefit her.


Full Article

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/na...l/news-story/f7d4fb43875684db8dbb18106d3eb95d
I would make the argument that it is only due to the allegations that the family are appearing so are proceeds of criminal behaviour
 
But if she committed a serious crime in Australia she wouldn't get anywhere near the monetary assistance to find a lawyer that she does because she committed a crime with a possible sentence of 20+years overseas.

Not sure that is exactly fair, especially seeing as the family is getting around the "proceeds of crime" laws to make bank as well
 
But if she committed a serious crime in Australia she wouldn't get anywhere near the monetary assistance to find a lawyer that she does because she committed a crime with a possible sentence of 20+years overseas.

Not sure that is exactly fair, especially seeing as the family is getting around the "proceeds of crime" laws to make bank as well
She could apply for Legal Aid in Australia
 
She could apply for Legal Aid in Australia

Obviously. But do legal aid solicitors get paid $290 an hour or barristers get paid $3600 a day? I don't get the impression that they do.

If not, she'll potentially be getting a better/higher paid legal defense provided for by the government in Colombia than she would in Adelaide
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

While people continue to support trashy tv shows by watching them this will go on.
 
There is no value in media reporting today. News has to become a defined term with codes of conduct.

Otherwise it should be shown with the word entertainment disclosure in the corner
 
Apparently the police might now be bothered to find "Angelo"/"Tom"
POLICE have reportedly obtained CCTV footage of a mystery man that could help prove the innocence of accused Aussie drug smuggler Cassandra Sainsbury.

Colombian police have seized security vision showing Ms Sainsbury’s only visitor during her eight day stay at a hotel in Bogota, believed to be a man Ms Sainsbury has previously identified only as ‘Angelo’.

Up until now, Colombian authorities, including the Attorney-General’s office, had been accused of ignoring the footage, and potentially the only major clue to back up Ms Sainsbury’s story that she groomed and then tricked into carrying 5.8kg of cocaine in her baggage.

The manager at Ms Sainsbury’s Bogota hotel, Ingrid Hernandez, told News Corp police had now visited the premises to view and retrieve the footage.
http://www.news.com.au/travel/trave...e/news-story/c2323fac6f71e1881777ce965ab66249

I'm still unclear as to how finding this guy would prove her "innocence"
 
Apparently the police might now be bothered to find "Angelo"/"Tom"

http://www.news.com.au/travel/trave...e/news-story/c2323fac6f71e1881777ce965ab66249

I'm still unclear as to how finding this guy would prove her "innocence"

cops won't look too hard as it was probably a cop or someone associated with a group that pays cops.

she should just "cop" the years on the chin and get on with life rather than trying to seek justice or mitigate her involvement. cops, judges and mayors in developing nations are to easily bribed.

The best she could hope for, going this direction, is more years in jail and worse case she uncovers some corruption and ends up dead.
 
Channel 9 are no doubt feeding stories into the News Media that play up the 'Tragic Innocent Duped' line. They will drip-feed information from 'sources', 'spokespersons', and such-like that can spin the story in the way they want to present it (the Innocent line is generally popular).

I notice in one of the News Stories today they have used one of her spunky 'athletic/sporty' photos again, rather than the 'caught drug mule' mugshot. No reason to drag out a photo from several years ago - except to keep presenting her in a favorable light.

As discussed above - it may be called News, but it's presented as entertainment.
 
If she is guilty then I hope she gets the death squad. These drugs ruin a lot of lives. There should be no mercy - or pity - for those trying to profit off of a drug that ruined lives and families. If she did get caught smuggling drugs - as alleged - then she should face the death squad.
 
If she is guilty then I hope she gets the death squad. These drugs ruin a lot of lives. There should be no mercy - or pity - for those trying to profit off of a drug that ruined lives and families. If she did get caught smuggling drugs - as alleged - then she should face the death squad.

Just putting it out there... not condoning it in any way. Or what she did.

But for those in the know... does Cocaine really 'destroy lives' and 'lead to crime' and 'put people in the gutter' 'overdoses' 'people in the ER' ???
Surely ice, alcohol and cigarettes are doing far more damage.
But maybe it would if more people had access to it.

The only people I know that have used it/use it are extremely successful and wealthy people...
And I could be wrong, just my experience. And I'm not saying it's good either just being specific.

Sometimes it's easy to throw a blanket over every drug because of ice etc
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Current Aussie woman caught with 5.8kg of charlie at Colombia airport

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top