- Moderator
- #2,301
Maybe 10 years ago
Last night got close to 40k right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe 10 years ago
I'll leave the last two seasons out of it, COVID and all that.
But then:
In 2019/20, Stars vs Renegades drew 54,478, the highest crowd all season. The next highest were the NYE game at Adelaide (41,414), then 35,296 for Thunder vs Sixers at the SCG and 30,388 for Stars and Renegades at Marvel.
And in 2018/19, the leading crowds were:
46,418 - Stars vs Renegades, MCG
41,987 - Adelaide NYE
40,816 - Stars vs Renegades, Marvel (The Grand Final)
40,646 - Scorchers, Optus Boxing Day
40,511 - Scorchers vs Heat
38,117 - Stars vs Renegades, Marvel (H & A)
36,612 - Scorchers vs Hurricanes
34,385 - Thunder vs Sixers, SCG
So in 19/20, three of the top four games were derbies.
And in 18/19, four of the top 8 games were derbies.
And so far this season, it drew the second-highest crowd, only 1,800 behind NYE.
Two teams in Sydney and Melbourne is good for the BBL.
Paramount, which was widely considered the preferred bidder early in the negotiations, said it never made a “formal bid” and had not actively pursued the rights in recent weeks. This decision coincided with the appearance of CA board director Richard Freudenstein, Foxtel boss Patrick Delany and Seven director Ryan Stokes and Lachlan Murdoch’s Christmas party. Sources close to the process said Paramount had asked the process to be put on pause until mid-January when executives returned from leave, and had put in a non-binding indicative offer.
Others close to the deal said it wasn’t this simple. CA and Foxtel executives continued to pursue a partnership with Paramount’s free-to-air partner Network 10 over concerns it could not work with Seven. Paramount refused to do a deal that did not include its streaming service, Paramount+ because it believed it would lose tens of millions of dollars if it did not share the rights across its platforms.
Cricket Australia defends Seven partnership as it seals new seven-year broadcast deal
Rival broadcaster Paramount has declared its values were “not aligned” with CA as Foxtel and Seven revealed a new seven-year deal.www.theage.com.au
--------------
oh the CA spin! "“Our priority was to run a fair process and all the major networks took part. We wouldn’t have engaged unless we were kind of serious about giving everybody the opportunity. But ultimately, we’re just delighted to be extending our partnership.”
News corp media coverage, in addition to cable/satellite/streaming reach as notedAnd what is it about Fox Sports that made CA want to stay with them?
It's not money, since CA would have gotten (a little) more from Ch10/P+.
Wouldn't have anything to do with Foxtel being the only cable/satellite provider in this country, would it?
Yep spot on - the top 4 highest selling newspapers all from the news stable that’s ultimately whyNews corp media coverage, in addition to cable/satellite/streaming reach as noted
They need to sign up other sports that wouldn't worry that 10/Paramount has little reach. A good start would be to snatch other Football to compliment A-League.Makes you wonder what Channel 10/Paramount has to do by the time the next sports deals come around to be taken seriously.
They need to sign up other sports that wouldn't worry that 10/Paramount has little reach. A good start would be to snatch other Football to compliment A-League.
Makes you wonder what Channel 10/Paramount has to do by the time the next sports deals come around to be taken seriously.
And what is it about Fox Sports that made CA want to stay with them?
It's not money, since CA would have gotten (a little) more from Ch10/P+.
Wouldn't have anything to do with Foxtel being the only cable/satellite provider in this country, would it?
Provide competent coverage on Paramount+.
2nd season into the A-League deal and it got so bad matches had to be streamed on You Tube.
If their A-League coverage was half competent, CA would’ve comfortably gone over to them
One of the problems is the sports codes in this country are clinging to the idea of only wanting to deal with one free-to-air network. For some reason the thought of having two networks broadcast a particular sport or code is not on, even though it's been done and done well before (see Cricket & AFL).Sport in Australia is hanging on for dear life with FTA coverage, it will all eventually be gone from FTA right or wrong. But it is fun to watch them cling on to it as they are.
Just delaying the inevitable.
Pretty much all the previous ratings draw cards were either absent, or played little part in the Aus Open this year.
Seven may not be that unhappy now. The state of Tennis the next few years looks a bit grim.
Men’s and women’s 50 and t20 World Cups, WTC Final, and champions trophy will all be shown exclusively on Amazon Prime for the next 4 years (Australian matches won’t be shown on free to air).
Men’s and women’s 50 and t20 World Cups, WTC Final, and champions trophy will all be shown exclusively on Amazon Prime for the next 4 years (Australian matches won’t be shown on free to air).
It'll be the same lot of commentators the ICC have been using, just on a different platform.If it means better commentators so be it
I find Amazon's "video" feed a bit hit and miss, lots of audio lag/syncing issues.
Even so Amazon are doing well in the Australian landscape
Packed to the Rafters
Neighours
Now going after Australian sports
Look for them to pounce on the AFL rights when they expire