Workshop Australian Flag

Remove this Banner Ad

craegus footy_fumbler

IMO you're missing the point - a salute to indigenous Australians on a new flag wouldn't be for the 3% of indigenous people who currently make up the population. It would be for the entire indigenous people, past present and future.

Indigenous Australians are not comparable to other minorities that make up Australia today because they were and will always be the original inhabitants of the land. To compare that with the building of infrastructure is to completely misrepresent the importance of being the indigenous people to a land. They aren't just 'another minority'.

Don't include me in your bigot post.

I never said I didn't want anything in the flag I posted to stop bring race into the comments.

If you lot choose to make this about race or religion then gtfo.
 
If you lot choose to make this about race or religion then gtfo.

Sorry, what?

Hey let's add white and blue due to the Greeks building most of our dams and infrastructure.
Hey lets add red due to the Chinese basically being here as long as the white man or maybe longer
Hey lets add orange due to the Dutch finding Australia before The brits.

Hey lets just make a flag that is Australian.
 
Sorry, what?

Oh tickle me with a feather, the context is neither the way you tried to twist it or taken the way you have posted it.

See this is the reason I don't want it changed.

Also can we change the aboriginal flag to included my smile?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

No I don't believe I am. Currently the major argument for the current flag is the representation of the UK on our flag and the connotations with that to the events of the past as well as not recognising certain parts of the Australian population.

Adding indigenous elements to a new flag will once again place us in the exact same position as the current flag. Yes it may show respect to those people, but it also places them in a position of being more important than everyone else in the nation. Currently the Aboriginal and Torres Straight people have their own flags that represent those two groups and that is the way it should remain. Australia is made up of people from all corners of the globe and as such we need a flag that represents every one of them without putting precedence to one over another.

Look at Canada, and now even New Zealand, their flag and potential new flag respectively feature no symbols that represent the indigenous peoples of their nations or any other specific group, but rather symbols that represent all of their people and as such they are and may be strong symbols for their respective nations. Should New Zealand change then we will have two perfect examples of what we should do with possible designs for a new Australian flag, and even if they don't we really just need to take the example of Canada as the perfect way to create a flag for everyone.

I disagree that it would make them out to be "more important" than the rest of the country. The Union Jack is not designed to do so in regards to the UK, it is there because we are a Commonwealth realm. An indigenous element would carry a completely different meaning to the Union Jack.

Canada's flag is great, and I think the one contesting the referendum in NZ is good too, but that doesn't mean we have to go down that path. NZ especially has a very different relationship with its indigenous people compared to us.

A flag is, among many things, an international symbol of a country. I think it would be great for foreigners to see an Australian flag and wonder "what's that shape/symbol there for?", and go on to discover a bit about our history.

I certainly believe that a flag that shows a bit of our history can nonetheless be a "flag for everyone".
 
I disagree that it would make them out to be "more important" than the rest of the country. The Union Jack is not designed to do so in regards to the UK, it is there because we are a Commonwealth realm. An indigenous element would carry a completely different meaning to the Union Jack.

Canada's flag is great, and I think the one contesting the referendum in NZ is good too, but that doesn't mean we have to go down that path. NZ especially has a very different relationship with its indigenous people compared to us.

A flag is, among many things, an international symbol of a country. I think it would be great for foreigners to see an Australian flag and wonder "what's that shape/symbol there for?", and go on to discover a bit about our history.

I certainly believe that a flag that shows a bit of our history can nonetheless be a "flag for everyone".

The Union Jack may have been placed there for that reason, but it has become a symbol for other reasons which are not what we want or need in a flag.

There is so much more Australian history than just that one element. Yes it is a major part, but everyone else has a history here and not all of them have that connection to the indigenous history so the flag should never be a representation of just one element of a nations history, rather one that represents all of it.

So that is why something that features our national colours and the federation star and probably the southern cross is a far better representation as it includes rather than excludes. The colours be it red for the soil that makes up the vast majority of our land, blue for the sea and sky that surrounds us, white for the beaches, or green and gold for either the national floral symbol the wattle or our sporting heritage. The federation star for the unification of all the individual states and territories into the current nation that we live. And the Southern Cross as a symbol that is unique to the southern hemisphere and sits above our entire nation looking over us as one. Those elements are far more thought provoking and representative to Australia in the 21st century than any other symbol could ever be.
 
TBFH indigenous imagery and a God darn kangaroo are about the only things uniquely Strayan to be genuinely suggested as part of our flag. Commonwealth doesn't count because the rest of the world will be like 'cool, a star'
 
The asymmetry kills it for me

It's the best of the lot but yeah

It's like trying to make a new Port logo.
The gold section either needs to be in the dead centre or closer to the hoist; currently it feels like it's just floating in the middle of the two positions.
 
I'd love to see what an aboriginal elder has to say about the flag.
I don't think they'd really care.

IMO, Craegus is dead right. Why already divide our nation with symbols that MUST showcase our country's Aboriginal heritage, when we can design something that represents ALL of Australians, not just singling out a minority group that some are suggesting?
 
TBFH indigenous imagery and a God darn kangaroo are about the only things uniquely Strayan to be genuinely suggested as part of our flag. Commonwealth doesn't count because the rest of the world will be like 'cool, a star'

Really? The USA has just Stars and Stripes but those have a massive amount of meaning, and many other countries have the same, so why do we have to have something that is specifically Australian that the rest of the world instantly knows is an Australian image. Shouldn't our flag have symbology that has meaning to all of us (the colours and the stars) rather than just be a brand icon for everyone else while having far less specific meaning to us (the Kangaroo is on our Coat of Arms and should remain there, and Indigenous imagery is far too specific and relates to only a small part of our entire nations make up).
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I don't think they'd really care.

IMO, Craegus is dead right. Why already divide our nation with symbols that MUST showcase our country's Aboriginal heritage, when we can design something that represents ALL of Australians, not just singling out a minority group that some are suggesting?
People indigenous to a land are not 'just' a minority group. In my opinion.
 
Well get going and start asking, or are you one of the ones that wants someone else to find out for you?
I honestly don't care about the flag (anymore). I'm trying to put out there that everyone saying 'we need to acknowledge aboriginals' might not be the best thing since we don't even know if that's what they want.
 
People indigenous to a land are not 'just' a minority group. In my opinion.
I'm not devaluing Aboriginal or Torres strait Islanders by any means. I'm just pointing out that these names are just that- names.
 
Are you an indigenous Australian or is this some dumb white person statement?

Racist.
You know the meaning of indigenous right?

Are the truly any indigenous people of this land if Adam and eve are from Africa?
 
Racist.
You know the meaning of indigenous right?
Indigenous with a capital I and indigenous with a lowercase i are different words.

One refers to a specific racial and cultural group, the other refers to the origin of something.

Confusing the two definitions says is quite dangerous.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Workshop Australian Flag

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top