How do you know so much about it ? He goes to the tribunal Tuesday night and you give the result out on BF at 8-15 the next morning.Were you there buy some chance ? If you were your on the wrong track about 6 witnesses,he only had 2.That come out of the gob of their team manager who lives opposite me was there along with his coach,father and advocate were the others present.According to the TM they only took the 2 witnesses as a punt because they said the umpire never seen the incident.They wouldnt have been stupid enough to knock back an automatic 2 weeks if they didnt think he could get off.Unfortunately for them they were wrong to take the punt but proven right about the ump not seeing it as he said Tedesco hit him with a right and the Spotty player said he hit me with a left.What does that say about the Umpire and the WRFL tribunal.He was guilty any way and has to cop his whack but those blokes continue to make the tribunal system look farcical.No different in any other suburban league i suppose.Other interesting thing is Tedesco losing his cool,usally a very hard but fair player who like all the good players in the comp takes a few cheapshots but gets his own back in the packs in hardball situations.He is a huge loss for them for the next 3 games but they have been pretty consistent this year and without being anything flash they seem to work well together and in an even comp as it is his loss may not be as significant.Talking about the tribunal do posters on here still believe in the adage that what happens on the ground stays on the ground or have times changed that much that anything goes these days ?
Be interested to hear your theory on the draw though Lachy.I will have a good look see if i can see where you are coming from.Not many people post on this board anymore but i am sure there are plenty who read it that cant wait for your summation of the draw.
