probably lack of currency after doing Papley and Martin trades. It would be bad faith to renege on their deals just because something shinier came along.Not sure why we wouldn’t pursue.What was the issue?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
probably lack of currency after doing Papley and Martin trades. It would be bad faith to renege on their deals just because something shinier came along.Not sure why we wouldn’t pursue.What was the issue?
A rollercoaster of emotion?Hearing it may be a coaster ...
Cutler please.
Could be one of those easy trades that comes out of the blue. No nomination required, just submit the paperwork and announce that he's a Blue.
I can multi-task hahasays the guy on BF haha
I think everyone needs another gif parade...Calm down.
The deals will get done.
Hearing it may be a coaster ...
Not if they are truly elite.Depends entirely on who the player is.
It’s not about the entertainment, it’s that it is needlessly long. They’ve had it longer periods and shorter, and all the list managers procrastinate until the end. It’s just a huge waste of everyone’s time.
Make me.Please stop throwing petrol on this bullshit
If is a west coast player , it may involve our pick 9 or next years first, geelong may demand that as well for Kelly, WC may ask to hold off until after Kelly trade doneMaybe is says that Essendon dont rate Papley as the equivalent of pick 9
Not if they are truly elite.
Stocker will be the one.
Sos did say that.Dan Butlers manager says it’s down to us and saints.
Didn’t SoS and Agresta say there wasn’t any interest from us?
Probably cost, both in what we'd give up and what they would mean in terms of other targets. Probably means we wouldn't have been able to get Papley and Martin and we thought the 2 of them with the roles they play would be more valuable than what the 1 could offer.Not sure why we wouldn’t pursue.What was the issue?
Funny you say that. It seems like Cutler is one of those players that'll move late as he doesn't have a clear destination yet. A Newman-type deal on the last day once we know where we stand on other deals would be well received.Cutler.
The new Newman
Totally agree. Seems SOS/Blues could be throwing that out there as a 'move' (public perception) regarding the Papley/Betts deals. Can still see him as an option, which Butler's manager inferred is the case for us.Sos did say that.
But I hope we still get him
Betts is only a year or 2. We still need one more of his type. Think he could have a future with us.
Hoping its Petrucelli.
But I'm not sure if the club is cultured enough to harbour an Italian dude from the northern suburbs.
Sos did say that.
But I hope we still get him
Betts is only a year or 2. We still need one more of his type. Think he could have a future with us.
This is the name being thrown up right now
How do you know they're procrastinating?
Seems evident to me that there's a lot of haggling going on, and making provisional deals with picks they don't yet have to ensure a trade provides the desired outcome.
Elite is subjective, that's the point.
Sos did say that.
But I hope we still get him
Betts is only a year or 2. We still need one more of his type. Think he could have a future with us.
Make me.
Also, why should I? It's a rumour discussion thread and I was literally discussing a rumour.