Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yeah we need more, no doubt. If one or two of the young midfielder high draft picks can go on to become gun players we will be a genuine contender. That 2017 was looking like a pretty poor draft prior to this year, but several within that top 10 had very good development years. Hopefully Dow can come on next year, in fairness several players in that top 10 who are now considered well above him weren’t really ahead of him at the start of the year. He was injured pretty much all year, hopefully he can have a big preseason and come on strong next year for us.The lack of progress of Dow and Lob is a big reason our strategy is being opened up a bit by observers. Had these two come on as expected relative to their draft group we would be banging the door down from that age bracket perspective. Cunningham and SPS on top add to that 'not quite landed yet' group. Thats 4 top 10 picks (Cunners close enough) that have not performed yet to their draft position would expect. You look at the top 10 of Dow and Lob's draft and we have managed to pick the 2 strugglers to this point unfortunately. Not saying it can't change just hasn't yet.
Agree with these. Less so point 3.
Apologies if it’s already been said. But in terms of keeping players at clubs and also keeping players in the system longer. I was a huge fan of the reduction in salary cap usage for veterans. I can’t remember the specifics but I feel like it was 10 years service at one club means only half the players wage counts towards the cap.
Would mean player retention would be higher as players know they might get better offers late in their career if they are one club players.
Also means less pressure for great players to be forced off lists. Simpson for example may have gone on if he knew his wage wasn’t hurting our cap as much.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Whilst I agree with you that it’s an excellent concept, it inevitably leads to less player movement and the AFL wants more drama and movement so it’s not really any chance of happening again.Agree with these. Less so point 3.
Apologies if it’s already been said. But in terms of keeping players at clubs and also keeping players in the system longer. I was a huge fan of the reduction in salary cap usage for veterans. I can’t remember the specifics but I feel like it was 10 years service at one club means only half the players wage counts towards the cap.
Would mean player retention would be higher as players know they might get better offers late in their career if they are one club players.
Also means less pressure for great players to be forced off lists. Simpson for example may have gone on if he knew his wage wasn’t hurting our cap as much.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I didn’t realise there was still something in place for this?I think that reduction is already in place?
AFL - News, Fixtures, Scores & Results - AFL.com.au
Australian Football League. All the latest AFL news, video, results and informationwww.afl.com.au
For Trelor that’s a bargain600k over 5 for each of them is not that cheap.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Dow and LOB strugglers?....2020 was certainly a write off for guys playing 2nds coming back from injury or trying to find form.The lack of progress of Dow and Lob is a big reason our strategy is being opened up a bit by observers.
You look at the top 10 of Dow and Lob's draft and we have managed to pick the 2 strugglers to this point unfortunately. Not saying it can't change just hasn't yet.
Williams can have 29 if Polson is delistedRetire 6 and 8 for a season out of respect.
Williams 16
Saad 42
Fogarty 37 (if he earns if, give him a jump up the order in 2022)
Williams 16
Saad 42
Fogarty 37 (if he earns if, give him a jump up the order in 2022)
Williams can have 29 if Polson is delisted
I think it needs to go back to preventative measures.
1. Draftees should be signed to 3-year initial deal and or a decreasing scale, trades should only take place if both parties agree
2. Abolish PSD
3 RFA - Acquiring club pays 50% of the compensation, coming off their first live pick
AFL still get their yearly meat market, while having more protective measures
Retire 6 and 8 for a season out of respect.
Williams 16
Saad 42
Fogarty 37 (if he earns if, give him a jump up the order in 2022)
you brain surgon ?Football players with any luck......................
good ones.
STOP IT!
We all know that you know it's a single n but ffs every time I see it written that way it reads as "kyoo-ners"
Literally no one:
Carlton board on Bigfooty: you've got to give a huge thank you to SOS...
The reality is SOS and Dodoro have earned reputations for their hardnosed approaches to negotiations which has seen them miss on some targets - hence the comparison, whereas Austin has been labelled soft or weak for accepting less back than what the armchair experts determined was warranted given our outlay for Saad.
Wells has long been considered to be reasonably generous in his dealings and is considered to have the approach of getting the right players into his club rather than worrying about winning deals at the negotiating table.
I wouldn't mind if Austin shared a similar approach if it leads our club to further success for which both SOS & Austin would deservingly receive their praises.
Its a shame the system is so rubbish that it allows these things to happen. If they made rookie deals longer eg 5 years and the a player could sign anywhere it would solve a lot of these issues. Get rid of all the compensation picks, academy's and FS rubbish as well.
That said, and it was a point of topic this week with Saad, if you poach a player, get them to verbally commit then they should be brought in. * are always tight arse scum with this, and hopefully player managers dont encourage their clients to go there.
1 and 2 Agree completely.
As for free agency (3), NO compensation what so ever, but RFA only 75% of wage should count towards the cap, for FA only 50% should count. If players choose to leave then they should be available to the highest bidder. It's the club's issue if they can't keep their players with that incentive.
Good call on the Bolton stuff. Other than Barker, we have had a complete overhaul though. I’d say that’s holding to account.Dow and LOB strugglers?....2020 was certainly a write off for guys playing 2nds coming back from injury or trying to find form.
Also Bolton’s strategy of throwing these guys into the deep end in their first year, hasn’t helped their development in hindsight. I think the Club’s coaches and development program should also be accountable and may be a factor in their progress.
The addition of the 'ers' after the 'Cun' dictates that the extra 'n' has to be added to be able to pronounce it
in a way that it's similar to Runners.
So yeah Arow, STOP IT, drives me mad too