The 200cm wingman ?They have Nik Cox. Seriously , That kid can be anything he wants
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The 200cm wingman ?They have Nik Cox. Seriously , That kid can be anything he wants
Who we would have chosen with any draft pick means bugger all considering we are talking about whether mistakes have been made. As long as a player was in the draft pool and available to us, it's relevant.We gave up an unlisted state league player. There is absolutely nothing to suggest we would have taken McAdam had we been able to keep that access.
-Williams when his body is right is at least a top 5 half back flanker, 800k is premium money but no draft picks is a win
-Martin, was very good last year, keeps doing his calf, when you consider the contract was front loaded and no draft pick @700k I count it as a win
-Saad, very good player but at 650k plus pick 8 when we already have Doc, Newman, Williamson and Williams to play half back. I don't like it, pick 8 is a huge price to pay
McGovern, effectively pick 13 and 800k, trash deal
And how is it relevant years later? This has been done to deathA players performance and price is always relevant. Had we paid pick 8 for fogarty his performance would be viewed differently as he is now.
yeah fair enoughAnd how is it relevant years later? This has been done to death
We know.The problem is that he is getting paid big $ for either being injured or not performing as it potentially restricts us from targeting other players of need, probably not a issue if the big contract $ were not attached.
He reminds me a lot of Kepler Bradley... he was flashy at times as well.The 200cm wingman ?
Do you know what is meant by front loading a contract? It means the majority of their contract is paid in the first year or two and then there contract drops down to a more manageable value in the later years so that the club has money to spend on free agents and trade targets down the track. Gov has been on our list for a couple of years now… so he isn’t getting the huge money people thinks he is.The problem is that he is getting paid big $ for either being injured or not performing as it potentially restricts us from targeting other players of need, probably not a issue if the big contract $ were not attached.
Gov also ranked elite a couple years ago for goal assists.Gov in full flight has low possessions but a goal kicker . Continuity is the problem with gov . I mean ******* rest him then test him. Then access ...
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Gov also ranked elite a couple years ago for goal assists.
Yes it's important for forwards to kick goals, but it's just as important setting them up. Noone speaks about that though which is unfortunate.
Yeah I agree mate.Not discounting his 12 touch presence. Couple of goals and assists is good. And his down the line and field kicking is good. But can’t stay on and get continuity. That’s the problem. That’s why I said rest him for the year
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
That’s what we should have done with Kreuzer in 2011 or Laidler in 2012… but some arseh*le with his fingers buried in the club pushes and suddenly the medical staff fall over themselves to declare a player fit. Thankfully, someone had the balls to say no in regards to pushing Charlie to start playing earlier. Gov will be back towards the end of the season… no sense in running him out sooner than next year.Not discounting his 12 touch presence. Couple of goals and assists is good. And his down the line and field kicking is good. But can’t stay on and get continuity. That’s the problem. That’s why I said rest him for the year
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Yeah I agree mate.
I was actually pretty excited for him to get some consistency this year after a good pre-season but unfortunately, as always, his body let him down. I couldn't imagine how frustrating it would be for him as well.
That’s what we should have done with Kreuzer in 2011 or Laidler in 2012… but some a-hole with his fingers buried in the club pushes and suddenly the medical staff fall over themselves to declare a player fit. Thankfully, someone had the balls to say no in regards to pushing Charlie to start playing earlier. Gov will be back towards the end of the season… no sense in running him out sooner than next year.
True, but we’ve managed to trash a couple of top players because of unrealistic expectations.
Saying we shouldn’t have got Saad because we have Newman is like saying we shouldn’t get Merrett because we have Kennedy.
Doch does seem a natural wingman though..Rubbish. Saad is what he is. A cream player who relies on being unaccountable to be at his best.
Saad was the wrong type of defender to get. What we needed, in reality, is a lockdown defender. We already had a, largely, unaccountable dashing halfback type in Sam Docherty. As it is, the coaching staff have already realized that you really cannot play both Docherty and Saad in the same backline.
Doch does seem a natural wingman though..
Plowman?That's fine. He can play both roles comparably well.
We still need a lockdown defender. Have needed one since Tuohy left. I hold that that should have been the target before getting in a Saad but it is what it is.
Stocker should move into the midfield soon, Parks is a third tall.
Gov has nowhere near the physical presence of The Duke, more suited to the lead up role of a Pearce IMO, albeit they are different types of playersRe: McGovern
Harry McKay and Charlie Curnow aside, McGovern is the only medium-or-taller forward that we have on the list that demands a defender play on him at all times. I'll dismiss the suggestions of Casboult because the opposition understands that his kicking doesn't hurt them consistently enough regardless of how much improvement he has had from the beginning of his career to now.
Clearly, he has been injured and hasn't lived up to the promise and expectations that we placed on him. Obviously, he needs to shoulder the responsibility placed on his performance. However, I can't help but feel that we've been robbed of the ability to see him play the role that was envisioned for him when he came to the club.
Count me as one of the few who still believe that there is potential there for him to play a significant role when he and Charlie Curnow return. If Charlie comes back remotely close to what he was (let alone what he could be) McGovern will lift so much weight off his (Charlie's) and Harry's shoulders. Potential is there for us to have our best forward line since the '95 season when Sticks, Brad Pearce, and Earl Spalding were at their best.
That Spalding role is what I envision McGovern playing for us. No expectation for him to kick 45+ goals but to primarily open the game up for the other two and to impact the contest. If he can do that and the three of them can stay fit then it wont be a question of how much McGovern is making to play that role because he'll be worth his weight in gold.
Still holding out hope and have confidence. It all hinges on the three of them staying healthy and not just two of them.
Plowman?
Gov has nowhere near the physical presence of The Duke, more suited to the lead up role of a Pearce IMO, albeit they are different types of players
Plowman is the single good lockdown defender we had...I think the club was hoping that SPS or Stocker would be lockdown defenders. Not happening as well as they expected. If what people are saying about Jordan Boyd and his ability of play lockdown defender, I'll be stoked. It leaves SPS and Stocks to run off the the centre.That's fine. He can play both roles comparably well.
We still need a lockdown defender. Have needed one since Tuohy left. I hold that that should have been the target before getting in a Saad but it is what it is.
Stocker should move into the midfield soon, Parks is a third tall.