But what's his actual football game plan?
Does anyone have any idea what kind of football he wants to play?
Up the gutz !!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But what's his actual football game plan?
Does anyone have any idea what kind of football he wants to play?
There's something unsavoury about Ross Lyon in my opinion. Can't quite put my finger on it. I feel like Voss will be a more transparent person. Whether he is as effective remains to be seen.The fact Ross withdrew and never re-entered even after Liddle departure and Cook arrival makes me suspicious he still didn't have enough support at club or he didn't want to divulge what happened at Freo. Clearly he was keen originally so something major stopped him. Perhaps the other party involved from incident threatened to go public if he proceeded with prominent role. Something strange about it so probably has worked out best for club to go with Vossy.
Yes, this is what concerns me. To Port fans he's always been seen the same way we saw Barker. Rated by many outside the club but every line he coaches seems to be a disorganised mess.No PP necessary.
However the only thing people seem to say about him is "he builds good relationships". Which is fine, but that doesn't help you when you're up against coaches who are tactically very good at producing game plans and getting teams to execute them.
What is he credited with at Port football wise for implementing?
You do hear of assistant coaches who are credited with such things, so Voss?
I was interested to read this from a Port fan from their perspective...
Thus I ask what does he bring football strategy and tactics wise?
Give the negativity a spell, the club has actually probably for the 1st time be through a process with Cook/Williams etc all ticking off on the decision.No PP necessary.
However the only thing people seem to say about him is "he builds good relationships". Which is fine, but that doesn't help you when you're up against coaches who are tactically very good at producing game plans and getting teams to execute them.
What is he credited with at Port football wise for implementing?
You do hear of assistant coaches who are credited with such things, so Voss?
I was interested to read this from a Port fan from their perspective...
Thus I ask what does he bring football strategy and tactics wise?
Did I say to let Voss choose him? I said he's got a strong relationship with Voss and is highly regarded - long term deal on the table at Geelong apparently.Isn't that why you let the coach pick their support crew?
How do they know if the newly appointed head coach will get along with the staff they are bringing in? How do they know if their footballing philosophies synch?
fair to say you have zero knowledge of whether he will succeed or not, happy to agree? you have no idea what he has learned the past decade, what his plans are now that he can implement them, how he will bond with the players, the game plans and contingencies he will put in place - your best effort is citing a swampy supporter with spelling issues........might want to pull back on the white-anting at least until the first autopsy thread in march........No PP necessary.
However the only thing people seem to say about him is "he builds good relationships". Which is fine, but that doesn't help you when you're up against coaches who are tactically very good at producing game plans and getting teams to execute them.
What is he credited with at Port football wise for implementing?
You do hear of assistant coaches who are credited with such things, so Voss?
I was interested to read this from a Port fan from their perspective...
Thus I ask what does he bring football strategy and tactics wise?
The kind where you get the ball and kick it through the goals and stop the other team doing the same.
Didn't stop us chasing Clarkson desperately like a deprived schoolboy and Sayers thought Lyon was an excellent idea. He was overruled by the board.Which ones were on the market?
Clarkson ..lost the fire clearly and was petering out if we are honest.
Lyon...a terrible idea amd clearly Carlton Board agree and let him know so weeks ago.
Scott bros.....nah their ships have sailed also.
Boak moved back into the midfield during pre season where Ollie hurt his shoulder. His own words. Completely discredits that port fans assertions.No PP necessary.
However the only thing people seem to say about him is "he builds good relationships". Which is fine, but that doesn't help you when you're up against coaches who are tactically very good at producing game plans and getting teams to execute them.
What is he credited with at Port football wise for implementing?
You do hear of assistant coaches who are credited with such things, so Voss?
I was interested to read this from a Port fan from their perspective...
Thus I ask what does he bring football strategy and tactics wise?
Did I say to let Voss choose him? I said he's got a strong relationship with Voss and is highly regarded - long term deal on the table at Geelong apparently.
Scarlett is one of the best defenders of the last 20 years so would be an improvement on our backs coach, too. Not to mention - like Lappin - he knows success. Getting as much 'success culture' into the club will only make us better (presumably they are the right fit for our club/group).
Thus I ask what does he bring football strategy and tactics wise?
Breaking news: Selection panel consults lots of coaches on various things, media tries to interpret without knowing full story.Didn't stop us chasing Clarkson desperately like a deprived schoolboy and Sayers thought Lyon was an excellent idea. He was overruled by the board.
Didn't stop us approaching Scott, Pyke, Buckley, even Fagan ... before Voss was on the scene. Our coaching selection panel was such a farce that involved the membership of a CEO who was on the way out.
We couldn't have wished for a better opportunity and we've picked the fish John West rejected when Teague was appointed.
I have no problem with Voss btw - just the suggested in some way this was how Sayers and the board planned it. In the end, it was the only palatable option to save some face after his proclamation that we would get an experienced coach.
All of those plus Buckley, Sayers' self-proclaimed mate.
There's a consistent theme here ... and it ain't the lack of quality in those coaches.
Interesting reference regarding Teague. Be interested in your description on how Voss has found himself in the role.Teague always appeared to act like a dorky uncle to me. In hindsight he really Bradbury'd himself into the senior coach role. Wish him well at Tiges I guess.
Voss will not take any sh*t and knows how to build strong relationships based on respect.
All of those plus Buckley, Sayers' self-proclaimed mate.
There's a consistent theme here ... and it ain't the lack of quality in those coaches.
Yeah because people whose job it is to talk directly to those within clubs know less than anonymous posters on fan footy forum. Makes sense.Breaking news: Selection panel consults lots of coaches on various things, media tries to interpret without knowing full story.
Boak moved back into the midfield during pre season where Ollie hurt his shoulder. His own words. Completely discredits that port fans assertions.
By the way, TheRedPill is consistently on the money:
View attachment 1243969
View attachment 1243968
View attachment 1243967
View attachment 1243965
View attachment 1243962
View attachment 1243964
Yeah because people whose job it is to talk directly to those within clubs know less than anonymous posters on fan footy forum. Makes sense.
Didn't stop us chasing Clarkson desperately like a deprived schoolboy and Sayers thought Lyon was an excellent idea. He was overruled by the board.
Didn't stop us approaching Scott, Pyke, Buckley, even Fagan ... before Voss was on the scene. Our coaching selection panel was such a farce that involved the membership of a CEO who was on the way out.
We couldn't have wished for a better opportunity and we've picked the fish John West rejected when Teague was appointed.
I have no problem with Voss btw - just the suggested in some way this was how Sayers and the board planned it. In the end, it was the only palatable option to save some face after his proclamation that we would get an experienced coach.
But what's his actual football game plan?
Does anyone have any idea what kind of football he wants to play?
Didn't say there was.Nothing wrong with asking the question.
Pretending am I?Ummm
Irony?
Who's pretending to know more than the club and the pro's again?