- Oct 7, 2002
- 16,018
- 16,528
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or he could play the remaining 7 H&A games this year + finals.7*25 + 218 = 393.
Still doesn't make it, unless you make the GF the hard way every one of those years.
If Deledio's achilles keeps giving him trouble he won't get close. He's struggled to get through the last 2 preseasons and whilst he probably doesn't have to do as much running to play half forward as on the ball he still needs to be in top condition (as Harvey has been).Yeah Deledio would be my bet.
Nick Riewoldt is already having to have weekly needles for his knee. I cant see him going beyond next year to be honest.
Of the current crop, Deledio looks most likely to me. Has played 225 games and is only 28. Debuted just before his 18th birthday and played seniors from the start, and has been very consistent from the word go.
Another 9 seasons at 20 games a season = 405 games, and he'd still only be 36, same as Bartlett, a year younger than Harvey and Tuck (37) and lots younger than Fletcher (40).
He's had a couple of injury niggles this year (and I think last?) which have cost him 4 games each season, but there's no reason to assume that injuries at 27/28 will mean he'll suffer more injuries later on. He might or he might not.
If he stays pretty much injury free, stays keen and keeps playing anywhere like he is at the moment, I reckon he's a chance.
Think Ablett might be a possibility to play 400, the shoulder might have hurt his chances though
But i honestly don't think their will be another, but in 20 years time i could be wrong. We'll just have to wait and see
Think Ablett might be a possibility to play 400, the shoulder might have hurt his chances though
A bit injury prone, isn't he?Grant Birchall maybe?
Age: 27yr 5mth Games: 205
Fair point, has bung knees from memory.A bit injury prone, isn't he?
Not sure what you're asking for.
Some players peter out and play here and there. Some are strong to the line and play most games. An average wouldn't mean much.
Gaff has played 100 out of a possible 110 games since his debut year. Only played 5 finals in his 4 completed seasons, though.Andrew Gaff would be a chance. Nearly fell off my chair when i saw it was his hundredth last week
Gaff has played 100 out of a possible 110 games since his debut year. Only played 5 finals in his 4 completed seasons, though.
After this season, he'd need just over another 12 seasons of 24 games (say 2 finals per year on average. Optimistic, perhaps.) to get to to 400. He would be 35 turning 36, and would have to have not missed a game. While he has played the last 94 games consecutively, he's not going to continue with another 300 on the trot. So realistically he's have to be playing at 37-38 at least. Shows how hard it is to get there. Also, the travel required of a WA side will hurt him quite a bit, you'd reckon. I've talked myself out of it happening.
But it would be funny if West Coast had no 300 gamers but Gaff as a 400 gamer.
Average of those who played 10+ years then maybe, get a trend on how many games guys who go out largely on their own terms end up with.
Irony of this is he probably will...Surely Franklin will get to 400? 218 games now, 7 years left on his contract.....
Irony of this is he probably will...