I joined yesterday but think Mutphy isn't getting a game with that Elizabeth team that lost by 550 points.
Cook has shown tremendous growth over the past 12 months.
That was a different account
Get your logins straight
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 6 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I joined yesterday but think Mutphy isn't getting a game with that Elizabeth team that lost by 550 points.
Cook has shown tremendous growth over the past 12 months.
I joined yesterday but think Mutphy isn't getting a game with that Elizabeth team that lost by 550 points.
Cook has shown tremendous growth over the past 12 months.
7,000 with a poor memoryActually you joined this account a week and a half ago
It was your other account that joined yesterday
How many do you have and why?
7,000 with a poor memory
I know
He was on wing, wasn't he? He has very good running patterns and presentation, and, as usual, was visible from the defensive goal square to the attacking goal square. I don't think he gets used often enough. He has to stay. As has been said, his last game was very good, apart from his first quarter kicking.Better game from Cook on Sunday I thought. I like that he spent some time in the back half also.
Shame about his kicking in the first quarter. Could have been a good game from him. Usually his one wood too
He's still at the glimpses stage. I love that we're persisting with him but would love to see him really stamp himself on a game. Stitch up his spot
Did you delight in his 46% disposal efficiency? This was by far the worst DE in our team.Better game from Cook on Sunday I thought. I like that he spent some time in the back half also.
To quote the biggest FIGJAM on this site: Were you at the game or did you watch on the Telly?Did you delight in his 46% disposal efficiency? This was by far the worst DE in our team.
He blasted up from 5 effective disposals against GWS to, wait for it…………SIX effective disposals against the lions. Throw in zero goals and zero tackles and surely it was a breakout game???
Yeah, he had one of his poorer disposal efficiency games... but you know this was very much the exception to the rule.Did you delight in his 46% disposal efficiency? This was by far the worst DE in our team.
He blasted up from 5 effective disposals against GWS to, wait for it…………SIX effective disposals against the lions. Throw in zero goals and zero tackles and surely it was a breakout game???
I love that the goalposts have shifted from calling him Four Touch to now outlining the one game he has poor disposal efficiency.Yeah, he had one of his poorer disposal efficiency games... but you know this was very much the exception to the rule.
If only you applied the same posting standards to our 100 game small forward... who has demonstrated time after time he is not up to AFL standard.
Jones 90 gamesIf Jones played a game like Cook did he would be blasted for not being good enough and needs to be dropped. No idea why people make excuses for Cook. He has played plenty of games this year and doesn't impact games enough. Needs to work on it, doesn't mean he won't be a player but why are we continuing to accept him playing wing/hhf and getting less than 10 touches?
I’d also argue that Cook isnt getting to spend much time on the wing, and is playing more as a FP/HF hence part of the reason behind the low disposal count. As opposed to Jones who is playing as a legitimate wing and Murphy who is playing far more a extra mid/HF role.Jones 90 games
Cook 24 games
Jones limited poise and average disposal
Cook lots of poise and good disposal
That’s why, besides isn’t it your view that we shouldn’t question the paid experts so why are you doing it now? Or was that as different Bazz on Twitter?
Jones is treated differently because of his draft position. Cook can have all the poise in the world but it's a waste if he has less than 6 kicks a game, 2.6 score involvements, 1.5 i50s, 1.5 tackles. He has big upside but he needs to start upping his impact on games. He is 22 and has had 4 seasons to amount to a 10 possession player. He won't be anything more than a Jones type role playerJones 90 games
Cook 24 games
Jones limited poise and average disposal
Cook lots of poise and good disposal
That’s why, besides isn’t it your view that we shouldn’t question the paid experts so why are you doing it now? Or was that as different Bazz on Twitter?
Yes Jones is treated differently by the coaches because of his draft position otherwise he wouldn’t have been given so many opportunities. Cook has been given nowhere near the same level. Cook is cut some slack because he has played **** all and has the skills we need.Jones is treated differently because of his draft position. Cook can have all the poise in the world but it's a waste if he has less than 6 kicks a game, 2.6 score involvements, 1.5 i50s, 1.5 tackles. He has big upside but he needs to start upping his impact on games. He is 22 and has had 4 seasons to amount to a 10 possession player. He won't be anything more than a Jones type role player
Which esteemed twitter expert are you? My point is solely that people think they know better with nowhere near the information available to AFL coaches and if you do to unfollow me so it's a weird take for you to have held on to and bring up in a different forum but go you.
Jones played the first two years like cook.If Jones played a game like Cook did he would be blasted for not being good enough and needs to be dropped. No idea why people make excuses for Cook. He has played plenty of games this year and doesn't impact games enough. Needs to work on it, doesn't mean he won't be a player but why are we continuing to accept him playing wing/hhf and getting less than 10 touches?
And his performance no doubt was complained aboutJones played the first two years like cook.
Yes but jones played in prime ball winning spots, not a forward pocket.And his performance no doubt was complained about