- Nov 21, 2010
- 13,831
- 18,340
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, Detroit Pistons
Will give the OP the benefit of the doubt and assume he misspelt Ben Stratton
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
so hows he going now that he can't rely on Watson to get the ball for him?
Ablett is above A+, by so far its not funny.
There's no denying that Cotchin and Danerfield are A graders, but not all midfielders are the same. He's taken a massive step this year (possibly coinciding with Goddard joining EFC) in become a seriously good footballer.
He runs all day, disposal has drastically improved and has also kicked more than ten goals.
Could you build a midfield around him? No. But there are only a handful of players which you could.
Name me a better link up mid in the AFL. I'd love to see a distance covered stat.
so hows he going now that he can't rely on Watson to get the ball for him?
Pretty good for a B grader, you should be happy with him.26 ish disposals, 4.5 marks, 3.5 tackles and a goal and a half a game since Watson went down...
Are they bad stats?
Stanton is a front runner with a very high work rate and decent foot skills. Of course when the heat is on or a hard tag he disappears very quickly.
The sort of player that looks very good when the team is up and about but no influence at all when they are up against it. Thats no major slur. Every team has players like that and good teams need them them to capitalize when they have dominance.
He is a very solid B to B+ player and would get a game at every club as their 3rd-6th best mid.
No, said my piece.
Fantastic.
So how do you think Brent goes about it? Forgetting Lance and all that..
I think he's a bit of a front runner, a bit like Embley, capable of some brilliant games, needs others to bring him into the game, very soft very outside, excellent runner.
Mmm...24 year old, premiership playing Embley (or when ever his peak was) I'd take over Brent any day.
Embley might have played 30 high quality games in his career.
He was good enough to pull out one of these games on the last day in September, but there's been alot of meh games, and alot of Stinkers.
Stanton is a front runner with a very high work rate and decent foot skills. Of course when the heat is on or a hard tag he disappears very quickly.
The sort of player that looks very good when the team is up and about but no influence at all when they are up against it. Thats no major slur. Every team has players like that and good teams need them them to capitalize when they have dominance.
He is a very solid B to B+ player and would get a game at every club as their 3rd-6th best mid.
Stanton is a front runner with a very high work rate and decent foot skills. Of course when the heat is on or a hard tag he disappears very quickly.
The sort of player that looks very good when the team is up and about but no influence at all when they are up against it. Thats no major slur. Every team has players like that and good teams need them them to capitalize when they have dominance.
He is a very solid B to B+ player and would get a game at every club as their 3rd-6th best mid.
Stanton wasn't even responsible for the squib of the match which was reserved for the Essendon skipper in the last quarter. Though who can really blame him, it was not only best for himself but also the team that he avoided that contest athough having said that I doubt Luke Ball would have jibbed it.Brereton loves pointing out moments of weakness. He looks for them.
Pendlebury, Swan, Ball, Beams, Thomas, Sidebottom. Stanton might be the sub.Not sure about that. I'd take Jack, Hannebery, O'Keefe, McVeigh, Kennedy and Goodes over Stanton. Stanton can rack it up against weak opposition but turns to water once he faces a tough opposition.
Pendlebury, Swan, Ball, Beams, Thomas, Sidebottom. Stanton might be the sub.
Sidebottom is just as hard a runner, kicks more goals and has much better disposal and decision making than Stanton. The only reason he has received little attention throughout his career is because our midfield is full of "stars". Sidebottom also has a terrific record in big matches and finals whereas I think that most would agree that in the few important matches Stanton has played in he has pretty much rolled over and given up. There was a pretty good reason why Essendon supporters got into the habit of boooing him you knowStanton would be just as effective if not more than Sidebottom if he was allowed the same freedom.
Brent would be handy as a 3rd or 4th midfielder in the top few sides, he just isn't good enough to break a tag week in week out like Jobe,Pendlebury,Ablett etc. I feel like we've been saying that for years now though so i doubt he's going to get better than he is now considering how many games he's already played.