Swanssince91
Club Legend
- Sep 9, 2023
- 1,321
- 906
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Banned
- #1,001
Gawn definitely wasn't himself, Pittonet is a spud and competed quite wellZero sense.
Grundy would have offered so much more as a ruckman.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Gawn definitely wasn't himself, Pittonet is a spud and competed quite wellZero sense.
Grundy would have offered so much more as a ruckman.
Gawn definitely wasn't himself, Pittonet is a spud and competed quite well
No, that's why it would've made sense to use GrundyDid you miss all the media about his broken toe?
No, that's why it would've made sense to use Grundy
No, it's just plain stupidityAre you trying to speculate something here?
As i said earlier, I am sure there is a valid reason why he didn’t play, it’s not a conspiracy.
No, it's just plain stupidity
No, I'd love to know why he wasn't.Do you know the reason why he wasn’t selected? Please tell me more.
No, I'd love to know why he wasn't.
Cost you guys the game
You have an injured ruckman and you have a gun that can back him up.So here you are calling it stupid without having absolutely any idea as to why he wasn’t selected.
Nice.
You have an injured ruckman and you have a gun that can back him up.
So why wasn't he selected?
If you went with a small as your sub I could understand.No idea why he wasn’t selected but I am sure there was a justifiable reason. I am not going to jump to conclusions and call it stupid as I have no idea what goes on in the inner sanctum of the match committee.
Playing a cooked McDonald ahead of Grundy when Gawn is injured is just bizarre.Schache's inclusion as sub to 'cover Gawn' would have to be the final insult.
The Pies never treated Grundy as poorly as Simon 'we value Grundy' Goodwin (the grubbiest guy in the AFL).
The only awful investment was the dees taking Grundy.You are awfully invested in this.
A few clubs got it completely wrongThe only awful investment was the dees taking Grundy.
Lobb was and is still neededA few clubs got it completely wrong
Lobb should've gone to the Dees, Lobb wasn't needed at the dogs either
You had the players already, needed a key backLobb was and is still needed
Goodwin, when questioned, admitted part of the reason Schache was brought in was because of Gawn’s injury.You have an injured ruckman and you have a gun that can back him up.
So why wasn't he selected?
Something doesn't add upGoodwin, when questioned, admitted part of the reason Schache was brought in was because of Gawn’s injury.
That’s even more perplexing as to why Grundy wasn’t chosen over him.
No we didn't and we also got Jones,You had the players already, needed a key back
Something doesn't add up
They keep saying he's been fantastic around the group, can't be the case
So you would give up a potential premiership for that?I assume its as simple as they didnt want to risk grundy being injured and then no one being willing to trade for him.
You were trying to play Bruce down back, he and Keath are below AFL standardNo we didn't and we also got Jones,
Melbourne needed Lobb though and got the wrong option and you will not pay as much as the dees fans think here as a 600k+ VFL player will cause massive issues
I agree. Grundy should have played.No, it's just plain stupidity