Reality rules
Cancelled
Without a conviction or any charges pending?Forfeiture
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Without a conviction or any charges pending?Forfeiture
Gil certainly responded like it was an ambush, downright appalling performance from the chief of the AFL. Wouldn't see Hirdy or Sheeds wimp out like Gil did.
Bit hard to launch legal action in the middle if an interviewGil certainly responded like it was an ambush, downright appalling performance from the chief of the AFL. Wouldn't see Hirdy or Sheeds wimp out like Gil did.
Or the conflicting oral and written statements tendered as evidence to the Federal Court.Are you referring to the same Hirdy "who has been gagged" and "can't wait to tell his side of the story"? Maybe McLachlan should have just gone that route instead of Hirdy's "I can't recall" plan B from the Middleton trial?
Without a conviction or any charges pending?
So in essence, you're saying no?Surely Vlad should have been a candidate, after his heinous conversation with Dave.
He could have threatened, but then again he's just a B Laws, not a lawyer.Bit hard to launch legal action in the middle if an interview
No, the other guy said it was a heinous crime. I agree.So in essence, you're saying no?
Maybe even hilarious for some. This is a spectator sport.No, the other guy said it was a heinous crime. I agree.
And yourself?He could have threatened, but then again he's just a B Laws, not a lawyer.
Alien 4 maybe?
Eminently qualified.And yourself?
In what?Eminently qualified.
If you ask your tag teamers around here the answer would be quite obvious.In what?
I thought as much.If you ask your tag teamers around here the answer would be quite obvious.
Does that mean he doesn't take contemptuous amounts of notes?He could have threatened, but then again he's just a B Laws, not a lawyer.
You must be Counsel Assisting!That already happened.
It's a shame we weren't privy to Gil's contemptible, er, contemptuous, er contemporaneous notes.Does that mean he doesn't take contemptuous amounts of notes?
Noted.It's a shame we weren't privy to Gil's contemptible, er, contemptuous, er contemporaneous notes.
If only Essendon hired Tania earlier to keep notesIt's a shame we weren't privy to Gil's contemptible, er, contemptuous, er contemporaneous notes.
He doesn't do much else, makes good reading though.16 pages of the interview word for word. What's the point
I'm sure James whispered a few sweet somethings in her ear, early in the saga.If only Essendon hired Tania earlier to keep notes
Gil certainly responded like it was an ambush, downright appalling performance from the chief of the AFL. Wouldn't see Hirdy or Sheeds wimp out like Gil did.