So Norfy, you think that because there hasn't been a publicized hanging and torture of Buddy, he isn't going to get reprimanded for his bad choices?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
So Norfy, you think that because there hasn't been a publicized hanging and torture of Buddy, he isn't going to get reprimanded for his bad choices?
Buddy has been treated no differently, for all we know. Our players muck up plenty of times without it making the press, or without sanction. Franklin's just not been sent to the gallows as some may like.Are you happy for every player on our list to snort whatever they like on a regular basis, or should the rule only apply to Buddy?
Treating certain players differently because they happen to be extremely talented opens up a huge can of worms. Nor in most cases does it do the player given the special treatment any favors either for that matter. Carlton turned a blind eye to Fevola's behavior plenty of times, no doubt hoping he'd grow out of it... in the end he not only destroyed his own career but damaged the club's reputation in the process.
Caro has not clearly laid her position out, and is very unlikely to do so. You may have a different view of it, and if so, I'd encourage you to express it.
I just wish she had the moral courage to say exactly what she was implying. It's very deliberate her use of the word "incoherent"
I have been a longtime supporter of female opinion in the game, its good to bring in other perspective. Caro however does not bother with the essence of the game but prefers to fill newspapers with the kind of tripe she believes will get people reading. Should the incident have merited sanctions, Buddy would have been dealt with accordingly. Noone is running from the fact that Buddy is a great player with an interest in having a good time. There is no crime here just pathetic journalsim. Will Caro start writing about Martin in the next couple of years, I doubt it, he wears different colours to brown and gold.
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...to-strike-deal-with-asada-20130330-2h0dx.html
Bottom part of article is of relevance
To me the salient point is the dates involved. This article is based on outdated information - the time this article was relevant (if indeed this was ever a story) was weeks ago. Why was the article released a few days before the Hawks first game? I don't think you have to put too much thought into the answer.... ;-)
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-ne...to-strike-deal-with-asada-20130330-2h0dx.html
"He looked like he might have had a few drinks, but he wasn't doing anything untoward that I saw"
If Caro was trying to suggest that Buddy was on something other than alcohol that day by using the term "incoherent", it's really showcased her naivety in these matters.
"Caroline Wilson" and "moral courage" are a gross contradiction in terms!I just wish she had the moral courage to say exactly what she was implying. It's very deliberate her use of the word "incoherent"
I dont really pay much attention to media reports regarding Buddy, but it does seem though that he is becoming not only too big for him self but too big for Hawthorn.
His Attitude needs some adjustment and Clarko and his mates can't keep protecting him as they have done so since he arrived at the Club.
It's more sinister than naivety though, she chose to leave the ambiguity in there - and it even sucked in our own supporters. People can be incoherent on drugs as well, but as most of us know it's just a lot more likely to happen with drinking.