- Banned
- #201
David Rodan
Nathan Buckley
Josh Hunt
to name a couple shorter players
Hunt has got MASSIVE biceps. Biggest arms in the AFL?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
David Rodan
Nathan Buckley
Josh Hunt
to name a couple shorter players
agree on all of those.Judd has muscle but I dont consider him a tank by afl standards.
Recent tanks to me include:
Barry Hall
Warren Tredrea
Fraser Gehrig
Mal Michael
to name a couple key forwards
David Rodan
Nathan Buckley
Josh Hunt
to name a couple shorter players
Back to the original topic...
3 Saints beat it earlier this week. Leigh Fisher came in first at 9:49.
Maybe the thread could be "Can you beat Leigh Fisher's time?"
Oh true were you in the early or late team?i got perth development footy coming up, and the beep test is in it, so it should be good, i cant wait, (this development footy is done in in december, and played early next year so they can pick the state 16s)
I did 2.5 in 9 last pre season, If i was at an AFL club i'd destroy the juddster
Yeah, I did 400m at Training few years back now at 42.4 when Michael Johnson done a 43.18 that year in Seville...I did 3km at Training few years back now at 9.45mins when andy walker done a 10.15 that year at draft camp
Sorry to burst your bubble but this is a common misconception.
Firstly we can assume that wind resistance is equal in both scenarios.
So when you are running uphill you need to produce a force in the forward direction as well as to counter a larger fraction of gravity (downwards) than as if you were running on a flat. Therefore the first part of the uphill will be slower compared to the flat course however things change in the second half. When coming downhill that same portion of gravitation force, which is a constant, that you were fighting against is now helping and you are running faster than someone on the flat course.
The reason running tracks are flat and not hilly is for practical reasons only. A 400m running track has to service events that are a fraction of 400m, but that doesn't detract from the fact that physics and the laws that govern the conservation of energy, work and momentum do not lie.
Sorry to burst your bubble but this is a common misconception.
Firstly we can assume that wind resistance is equal in both scenarios.
So when you are running uphill you need to produce a force in the forward direction as well as to counter a larger fraction of gravity (downwards) than as if you were running on a flat. Therefore the first part of the uphill will be slower compared to the flat course however things change in the second half. When coming downhill that same portion of gravitation force, which is a constant, that you were fighting against is now helping and you are running faster than someone on the flat course.
The reason running tracks are flat and not hilly is for practical reasons only. A 400m running track has to service events that are a fraction of 400m, but that doesn't detract from the fact that physics and the laws that govern the conservation of energy, work and momentum do not lie.
Congratulations Pansies on being 100% wrong.
Have you ever tried running?
You certainly display no knowledge of the physical effort in running.
The effort required is affected by the gradient and it is actually difficult to even run downhill at the same pace as you can maintain on the flat and it is only on slight gradients that you can exceed the time you would produce on a flat run. This is due to the different bio-mechanics involved.
You can NEVER make up on a downhill what you lose on any uphill.
the beep test is a good form of testing when doing it with a group of people like a footy team becasue you get pushed along by your teammates and it really finds out how fit you are becasue you have the determination to better everyone. but i don't think it is easy to compare becasue people do it with different conditions, maybe by them selves and somepeoples measuring i just don't trust. so comparing on a website i feel is stupid(most people lie anyway) Judd had probobly ran the day before and i'm sure he could of done much better than that if he actually prepared properly for it. the real test againast someone else is when you are doing at the same time and its really a mental battle
if i'm running a beep test with anyone in my footy team i will most of the time do very well but by my self or without anyone from my footy team i'll struggleExcellent. I completely agree, and i have experienced this myself. I have done a beep test by myself before and scored mid 10s. Few weeks later at training we were put through a beep test without warning and i ran high 13s. Half of it is psychological.