Carl v Coll who got the rough end of the umpiring stick?

[sp-mac]

Is Derek Humphrey Smith serious? What do others think?

We was rooted IMO. He has picked one Deliberate decision and turned it into the reason we won.

No mention of the dodgy decisions against Shaw (X2) and Walker.

 

[Zeke]

Collingwood clearly.

 

[Jaymin]

I was there Saturday and hate both teams equally.

Carlton got the worst deal from the umpires by an absolute mile.

Whether it would have changed the result of the game is doubtful.

Both teams were probably worse than the overall umpiring IMO.

 

[Silvagnis]

To reiterate my point if the frees there it has to be given. Carlton aren't complaining about the frees that were missed and we lost.

 

[hotpie]

Who cares. Its now Tuesday and we have the four points.

 

[lioness]

Both sides were pretty harshly done by, but I felt overall, Carlton got it worse.

 

[thegezman]

i thought there were plenty of shiity calls both ways and some clearly missed both ways, but from watching on telly i thought calrton got the rub of the green from the umpires.

felt the pies were generally a bit stiff but it started to even up towards the end.

blues got a better run


and i'm a carlton supporter

 

[JP83]

I was a neutral supporter at the game and i thought collingwood clearly got the rough end of the stick. The 3rd was the most disgraceful umpiring ive seen. Carlton got 3 goals from free kicks and then collingwood got 1 very soft one. So carlton were 2 goals up thanks to the umps.
Seriously if those 3 umpires get a game this week what does that say? To me it says that gieschen is happy with their performance, so we will have to put up with the same rubbish this week.

 

[Ripper]

Both sides were pretty harshly done by, but I felt overall, Carlton got it worse.

Agree

 

[Cassius_Clay]

I was a neutral supporter at the game and i thought collingwood clearly got the rough end of the stick. The 3rd was the most disgraceful umpiring ive seen. Carlton got 3 goals from free kicks and then collingwood got 1 very soft one. So carlton were 2 goals up thanks to the umps.
Seriously if those 3 umpires get a game this week what does that say? To me it says that gieschen is happy with their performance, so we will have to put up with the same rubbish this week.

correct...good post

 

[celtic_pride]

I feel the vomit coming out from the edge of my throat as I type this but I think Collingwood were treated appallingly by the umps, esp in the 1st half, mind you Carlton got jibbed in the 3rd quarter, but overall, The Pies got a worse deal in one of the most disgraceful umpiring performances I've seen in a long time.

 

[Cassius_Clay]

I feel the vomit coming out from the edge of my throat as I type this but I think Collingwood were treated appallingly by the umps, esp in the 1st half, mind you Carlton got jibbed in the 3rd quarter, but overall, The Pies got a worse deal in one of the most disgraceful umpiring performances I've seen in a long time.

I think this post has just ended the thread. Why would a carlton supporter ever say they got the lucky umpiring decisions unless they actually did.

Thread Over

 

[sp-mac]

I was there Saturday and hate both teams equally.

Carlton got the worst deal from the umpires by an absolute mile.

Frees inside 50- Carlton 8, Collingwood 0.

Free Kicks Carlton 29, Collingwood 18.

I've given reasons for my opinions would you like to give reasons for yours?

Whether it would have changed the result of the game is doubtful.

Both teams were probably worse than the overall umpiring IMO.

15.1 in the second half, yeah that was crap eh?

 

[Lonie_from_50]

Collingwood, only because too many free kicks that were 50-50 were payed to Carlton, that resulted in goals.

 

[MOJOE]

This is amusing.

 

[Funkalicous]

You guys are losers!

 

[YESTER34]

Collingwood clearly.

pull your head out of your arse zeke.

collingwood clearly got the better of it. the ones shaw gave away were there

 

[Vedder]

pull your head out of your arse zeke.

collingwood clearly got the better of it. the ones shaw gave away were there

Yeh sure they were
and whitnall deliberately put the ball out of bounds...right??

 

[Hornet]

Frees inside 50- Carlton 8, Collingwood 0.

Free Kicks Carlton 29, Collingwood 18.

Where free kicks are paid is irrelevant...if they're there they must be paid

Total free kicks can be misleading and to assume that both teams have to finish with the same amount is just being ignorant

 

[bucksisbest]

Collingwood were absolutely r*ped , principally by that incompetent weed McLaren.

 

[Cassius_Clay]

You guys are losers!

haha

Carlton 16. 12. (108) def. by Collingwood 20. 8. (128)

 

[steviewonder36]

I was there Saturday and hate both teams equally.

Carlton got the worst deal from the umpires by an absolute mile.

Whether it would have changed the result of the game is doubtful.

Both teams were probably worse than the overall umpiring IMO.

How many beers did you have?

The free quick count was 29-17 in favour of Carlscum, that's almost equivalent to have an extra player on the ground.

 

[Ripper]

How many beers did you have?

The free quick count was 29-17 in favour of Carlscum, that's almost equivalent to have an extra player on the ground.

There is no reason why freekick counts have to be equal.

In fact if they are it usually means that the umpiring has been bad.

 

[Knowledge]

Why make a poll will collingwood in it?
People will automatically vote against collingwood simply because they hate them and are obsessed

 

[Blues_Man]

How many beers did you have?

The free quick count was 29-17 in favour of Carlscum, that's almost equivalent to have an extra player on the ground.

8 of those free kicks were results of Rhys shaw and co kicking the ball out of bounds on the full .
since when do free kicks given have to be even ??? only a moron would think they should