Central Murray FL

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Who was the brainbuster of a mathematician who worked out tyntynders points on the weekend??? pity corrie still has to come in.
 
Maybe you're getting stuck into the wrong group of people here. Surely the Kerang selectors/bench have an obligation to tell the truth here, if they had Nolan's decision wouldn't have been a problem.

Next thing you will want is for the players to put a hand up when they infringe and give the kick to the oppostion. Umpires are there to make a decision not ask for a census.
 
Who was the brainbuster of a mathematician who worked out tyntynders points on the weekend??? pity corrie still has to come in.

Seems to me that clubs aren't particularly worried about the point system. What I would like to know is who allocates the points to the players? Our club had the situation of a player being on 5 points even though he was playing seconds. Go figure.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Who was the brainbuster of a mathematician who worked out tyntynders points on the weekend??? pity corrie still has to come in.

Tyntynder are screwed not only points wise but did the payed players get any coin on the weekend or were they told they will get it when somone chases a rainbow down to get the pot of gold?:mad: :mad:
 
Who was the brainbuster of a mathematician who worked out tyntynders points on the weekend??? pity corrie still has to come in.

now settle down john you were a great player at the blues but to come on here and talk about s hit you don't know isn't good. yeah corrie has to come in but there are 2-3 blokes who are fringe players who are 3 pointers this will free us up.
and why do you need 4 on the bench when the quaters have been reduced by 5 mins? was hard enough to rotate 4 when the quaters were 25 plus time on.
like kidkorageous says above we have a guy who has signed through moving to the town not because we went to his league and recruited him and he is a 3 pointer. he played 3 senior games in that league last year and the rest in the 2's so should he be a 3 pointer? it would be the same as jerome kelly leaving tyntynder to play at lalbert. he has played 3 senior games in his life, should he still go as a 5 pointer?
 
Tyntynder are screwed not only points wise but did the payed players get any coin on the weekend or were they told they will get it when somone chases a rainbow down to get the pot of gold?:mad: :mad:

now lalza i found a rainbow today and at the end was a pot of gold and our players will get paid on a thursday night like they have since the conception of paying players so get ur facts right
 
Does any one talk about footy that was played on the weekend. or is everyone just concerned about every other side except there own. Tooleybuc and tyntynder must of been impressive on the weekend. any reports??????? I thought Kerang was going to be top 5 or is that how much the comp drops away after the top 3 or 4???????
 
Any more info on the dogs points? I was under the impression that the league must deny clearances if the player will put them over their allocation. So are they over and will this dictate their selections on a Thursday? And of course the dogs dont spend much money:rolleyes:
 
I went and saw Leithcville/Gunny on the weekend, they where not playing much but they made a mess of Lalbert.
If it wasn't for Charles it would of been a lot worse!!
Are the farm boys a chance or not in 2007? From what it sounds like it there is only a three or four sides with a chance.
 
Just on the Umpires... The GRFL Umpires are that far ahead of the morons officiating in the CMFL it isn't funny. All but 1 of the GRFL Umpires have played Senior footy somewhere before donning the whistle and wrist bands, and he umpired in the old VFL. I wonder if there are is the same ratio in the CMFL.

Kerang have a little ground to make up to be a force with the likes of T/M and Balranald. Not yet won over by Tyntynder though.
 
Any more info on the dogs points? I was under the impression that the league must deny clearances if the player will put them over their allocation. So are they over and will this dictate their selections on a Thursday? And of course the dogs dont spend much money:rolleyes:

There is not point denying the fact that we are pushing the threshold of our points allocation. Saturday we were able to play with 3 on the bench so we were not that bad off. We have Corrie (4 points) to come back into the side that will put pressure on selectors. The league hasn't denied us of any clearances and how could they what if a seconds player from within the league wants to play at another club and is a 5 pointer? The league can't stop him from being cleared on the off chance that he might play seniors and put them over.
I think the league should seriously think about making Colts players who play senior footy while they are still in Colts worth zero points. This would make clubs put more time into developing juniors and playing the ones that are good enough rather than recruiting fringe players who are 2-3 points.
On another note was listening to a particular footy show on the radio early Sat morning and heard a Lake Boga supporter and radio station worker talking about putting the value of recruiting players from the same league up to 8 points. That club would have been pushing it if Adam Kelly actually went with Marcus Nalder, Reece Collins & Ross Turner (who did go) and they are only the ones from our club they spoke to. Maybe he should think about what he says on air.
 
What happens with the points system each year? I will use Tyntynder for example. We are allocated 41 points from the league (which is a crock) with every player going down in value each year by 1 point. If we have 10 players who are over 1 point that gives us an extra 10 points to go and recruit 2 x 5 point guns from within league or 3 x 3 point players from other major leagues.
This point system is not going to stop clubs from recruiting instead of working on junior development and playing locals like it was supposed to. This is only in its early days but is looking like it's going to have about as much impact as the salary cap.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

There is not point denying the fact that we are pushing the threshold of our points allocation. Saturday we were able to play with 3 on the bench so we were not that bad off. We have Corrie (4 points) to come back into the side that will put pressure on selectors. The league hasn't denied us of any clearances and how could they what if a seconds player from within the league wants to play at another club and is a 5 pointer? The league can't stop him from being cleared on the off chance that he might play seniors and put them over.
I think the league should seriously think about making Colts players who play senior footy while they are still in Colts worth zero points. This would make clubs put more time into developing juniors and playing the ones that are good enough rather than recruiting fringe players who are 2-3 points.
On another note was listening to a particular footy show on the radio early Sat morning and heard a Lake Boga supporter and radio station worker talking about putting the value of recruiting players from the same league up to 8 points. That club would have been pushing it if Adam Kelly actually went with Marcus Nalder, Reece Collins & Ross Turner (who did go) and they are only the ones from our club they spoke to. Maybe he should think about what he says on air.

I think they then need to sign a form that they are a seconds player only. I'm not saying the system is right, just whaqt i thought it was. That if you have 42 points, then that is it for your list not just your team on Saturday. If Tyntynder are over then that must not be the case. But as you said it then doesn't stop recruiting within the league as it was designed to do.
 
Baranald for the 07 flag.....................
Cant see anyone really coming close to baranald this year,probably recruited the best out of most country football teams this year.
They have a coach who will get the best out of most footballers and a full forward who is far to good for this competition.
I just hope for the sake of the Baranald football club that Big Belraj Singh repays the club off the field as well as on the field.
A few aus kick clinics and a generous amount of money tipped back over the bar would be a start.
Is renowned for taking the cash and running but i dont reckon Filo will let him do it this year.
Stick around the club belraj,mix with the supporters help out the juniors,donate to the footy trip.
 
I think they then need to sign a form that they are a seconds player only. I'm not saying the system is right, just whaqt i thought it was. That if you have 42 points, then that is it for your list not just your team on Saturday. If Tyntynder are over then that must not be the case. But as you said it then doesn't stop recruiting within the league as it was designed to do.
I am of the belief that the points relate to the senior side only. That is if you have injured players or seconds players worth another 40, 50 or 60 points it is irelevant. The players that take part in the senior 22 are the only ones whose points are counted each week. One week you might have 38 points, change 2 players and next week have 46 points, i.e. dropp 2 one pointers and promote 2 5 pointers. That is my understanding
 
There is not point denying the fact that we are pushing the threshold of our points allocation. Saturday we were able to play with 3 on the bench so we were not that bad off. We have Corrie (4 points) to come back into the side that will put pressure on selectors. The league hasn't denied us of any clearances and how could they what if a seconds player from within the league wants to play at another club and is a 5 pointer? The league can't stop him from being cleared on the off chance that he might play seniors and put them over.
I think the league should seriously think about making Colts players who play senior footy while they are still in Colts worth zero points. This would make clubs put more time into developing juniors and playing the ones that are good enough rather than recruiting fringe players who are 2-3 points.
On another note was listening to a particular footy show on the radio early Sat morning and heard a Lake Boga supporter and radio station worker talking about putting the value of recruiting players from the same league up to 8 points. That club would have been pushing it if Adam Kelly actually went with Marcus Nalder, Reece Collins & Ross Turner (who did go) and they are only the ones from our club they spoke to. Maybe he should think about what he says on air.
Lookalike, in one breath you bag the system for not promoting junior development just after admitting you side played one short to fit all your newly acquired stars under the points allocation..
Is it just me or this a huge contradiction, why not drop one of these 2 or 3 point players and give 2 young players from the colts or seconds a run since you are so concerned with developing these players??
 
Lookalike, in one breath you bag the system for not promoting junior development just after admitting you side played one short to fit all your newly acquired stars under the points allocation..
Is it just me or this a huge contradiction, why not drop one of these 2 or 3 point players and give 2 young players from the colts or seconds a run since you are so concerned with developing these players??

How do you get off the bottom of the ladder in this point system?
Quality recruits will set you back to many points and for the teams that have weak colts going through the system how do they get back up to be in contention to play finals, when balranald has run out of money who will be left to play for them as it would be hard to atrract the locals to all stay there as ther wouldnt be that many job opportunities
 
Lookalike, in one breath you bag the system for not promoting junior development just after admitting you side played one short to fit all your newly acquired stars under the points allocation..
Is it just me or this a huge contradiction, why not drop one of these 2 or 3 point players and give 2 young players from the colts or seconds a run since you are so concerned with developing these players??

managed to find a internet cafe on your honeymoon sockit...
i never bagged the system for not promoting juniors did i? i thought i said by making colts who play seniors while they are still eligable for colts a zero it may make some clubs more accountable for playing and promoting juniors. we had a couple of colts players in our senior side on the weekend. there are 3 reasons behind us playing only 3 on the bench. 1 we were at our point limit and 2 with the quaters being reduced by 5 mins each we have lost 20 mins of playing time, its hard enough to rotate 4 blokes with the extra time imagine how hard it would be with 20 mins less. it wasn't that long ago that there were only 3 on the interchange anyway. 3rd reason is that we were struggling for 2nds players last week so it may have had something to do with playing in cohuna rnd 1:D
 
What happens with the points system each year? I will use Tyntynder for example. We are allocated 41 points from the league (which is a crock) with every player going down in value each year by 1 point. If we have 10 players who are over 1 point that gives us an extra 10 points to go and recruit 2 x 5 point guns from within league or 3 x 3 point players from other major leagues.
This point system is not going to stop clubs from recruiting instead of working on junior development and playing locals like it was supposed to. This is only in its early days but is looking like it's going to have about as much impact as the salary cap.[/quote]

What a load of bulls h i t. If i was in charge of a club because of the points system i would look after local kids, local players & recuits because the longer you keep your current list the more players a club can fit in. It already has had more impact than the salary cap, it's stopped Tyntynder from recuiting more players. And Balranald & Toolebuc/Man for that matter. The salary cap could not have done that!
 
Baranald for the 07 flag.....................
Cant see anyone really coming close to baranald this year,probably recruited the best out of most country football teams this year.
They have a coach who will get the best out of most footballers and a full forward who is far to good for this competition.
I just hope for the sake of the Baranald football club that Big Belraj Singh repays the club off the field as well as on the field.
A few aus kick clinics and a generous amount of money tipped back over the bar would be a start.
Is renowned for taking the cash and running but i dont reckon Filo will let him do it this year.
Stick around the club belraj,mix with the supporters help out the juniors,donate to the footy trip.
Filo will get all that out of him but saw the big man at the under 11's last week and prob will this week as for every other balranald senior player. Very good to the kids around the club on all reports as well
 
Unfortunately our football league has run into a huge problem, money some have it and others don't. That breaks down into being able to afford players and not being able to afford players. Obviously the salary cap idea can be thrown out because its a cash industry. Although the league are still trying make the competition as even as possible. The points system is a step in the right direction, although there are a few things that will need to be adjusted in time.

Imagine if there was no points system, balranald would be able to afford a side that would be competitive in the VFL!
 
Lets stop talking crap about points, the league will look after that. How about the footy? Anyone have any outlandish predictions about teams or players that might come out of left field this season? Anyone see the Balranald v Swan Hill game on weekend? FBI (****ing big indian) Balraj was a handful but the game was otherwise a great contest. What about Tyntynder, Wooranen and Leitchville all had big wins. Are they the real deal?
L
 
What happens with the points system each year? I will use Tyntynder for example. We are allocated 41 points from the league (which is a crock) with every player going down in value each year by 1 point. If we have 10 players who are over 1 point that gives us an extra 10 points to go and recruit 2 x 5 point guns from within league or 3 x 3 point players from other major leagues.
This point system is not going to stop clubs from recruiting instead of working on junior development and playing locals like it was supposed to. This is only in its early days but is looking like it's going to have about as much impact as the salary cap.[/quote]

What a load of bulls h i t. If i was in charge of a club because of the points system i would look after local kids, local players & recuits because the longer you keep your current list the more players a club can fit in. It already has had more impact than the salary cap, it's stopped Tyntynder from recuiting more players. And Balranald & Toolebuc/Man for that matter. The salary cap could not have done that!

You haven't read a word i typed. I didn't say the salary cap stopped recruiting, what i said was the points system will have about the same impact as the salary cap.
The teams who are strong now with the points system will be strong next year and the year after and possibly even the year after that provided they can afford it.
As i stated earlier any player at the same club next year who is above a 1 point will come down a point each year at the club. So next year Balranald, T/M and Tyntynder could have a possible 10-12 points spare which is another 4 guns from any major league if they can afford them.
How does that promote junior development and playing locals? If people have spare points and $$$ they weill use them mark my words.
 
Lets stop talking crap about points, the league will look after that. How about the footy? Anyone have any outlandish predictions about teams or players that might come out of left field this season? Anyone see the Balranald v Swan Hill game on weekend? FBI (****ing big indian) Balraj was a handful but the game was otherwise a great contest. What about Tyntynder, Wooranen and Leitchville all had big wins. Are they the real deal?​
L​
You would think that the jury would still be out for Leitchville-Gunbower. They only played Lalbert. We should see how they perform against the established order before we make any outlandish statements. The same can be said of Woorinen. Tooleytang were excellent in thrashing Kerang and they pose a big threat to Balranald. Kerang have some work to do to match these sides at the moment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top