Tracker 101
Cancelled
I would suggest that Smith might line up on Pearce Hanley as a Defensive forward.Smith won't (or shouldn't) be playing in the backline though.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would suggest that Smith might line up on Pearce Hanley as a Defensive forward.Smith won't (or shouldn't) be playing in the backline though.
Yeah, I agree he should play forward, he's been looking pretty good there with EP. McGinnity could also provide some pace in defence, but we can throw Smith back if it looks like we are being troubled for pace in the backline (that whole versatility thing Simpson has been talking about)Smith won't (or shouldn't) be playing in the backline though.
None of them are agile enough with that pace to go with Green or Zorko though. So we'll end up having Butler chasing them....
Bennell would be perfect.
Nicnat the super sub?
http://www.sportal.com.au/afl/news/...i-the-late-torpedo/1rlgsqxo8xbu21n693hueeheva
Can't decide if I'm for or against it... When he's 'on', not a chance, but he hasn't been consistent year, our finals chances are gone, and he would be one of the few players on our list that would actually have impact as a sub. It also gives guys like Lycett and Sinclair a chance to ruck at AFL level.
Not actually as stupid as it sounds...
Sarcasm I'm sure, but the point of the article was that we struggle to run out game (as does NN) and that to bring him on half way through the third to have an impact may be an advantageAnytime you can play the future of your club, it's highest paid player, as a super sub ruckman against one of the worst teams in the comp you've gotta do it ....
It'll be awesome if a Lecca or a mid goes down earlier and we end up with 4 ruckmen
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No it does not. Clubs experimented with having talls as subs when the sub first came in, it was quickly found out to be the worst idea possible. I'd hope we'd have learnt from that mistake.Sarcasm I'm sure, but the point of the article was that we struggle to run out game (as does NN) and that to bring him on half way through the third to have an impact may be an advantage
Do I think that he will be the sub, no way, but it does have merit
Really hope Cox doesn't play. Hopefully Smith and Tunners are ins and get full games. As above, Butler for sub.
At least we don't have to deal with a 7 man bench for another day...I much prefer knowing today (late changes aside).
Shut down Hanley, shut down Zorko and we win.
I absolutely second this and hope you're right.Sinclair to replace Kennedy.
I'm hoping Cox will be rested and is going as ruck coach.
If he's going to play out this season than just play him for home games
I think that he is a skilled player but lacks that intensity at the contest.I think Wellingham is a scapegoat to be honest. He's not been terrible and he's not been at the top of his game but there are other players playing much worse.
But he's been lazy. And with that I'm happy that Simpson would play someone like McGinnity over him, especially at this stage of the season.I think Wellingham is a scapegoat to be honest. He's not been terrible and he's not been at the top of his game but there are other players playing much worse.
Cox out again. Writing is on the wall