Could they play it at the G as an opener to our game at 4:35?
Like the way you think
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could they play it at the G as an opener to our game at 4:35?
Another conspiracy theory gone wrong. Sounding like Charlie will be more likely for next week, not this week.Leak of news like this means cripps is done for the season with a broken foot ... usually the way this stuff goes at the Ikon
Written with tongue in cheek -- anyways great news for cripps seems Russel doesn't agree with SEN about this weekAnother conspiracy theory gone wrong. Sounding like Charlie will be more likely for next week, not this week.
Round 18 vs the Bye.Charlie’s return match?
Reserves fixture...
Rd13- GEE...HOME
Rd14- COLL...AWAY
Rd15- NTH...HOME
Rd16- SAND...AWAY
Rd17- GCS...HOME
Rd18- BYE
Rd19- GWS...HOME
Tough mob the Bye, 50/50...Round 18 vs the Bye.
Seems like Charlie might be ready to roll against the Filth the week after...Round 18 vs the Bye.
Straight into the seniors after 2 years out and half a VFL game?A half against Collingwood reserves to get some touch back, and assuming he gets through that without getting hurt, and hasn't completely forgotten how to mark and kick, then unleash him against North the following week in the seniors.
It's not like he's just getting out of a moonboot now. He's been running for months, doing skills work for over a month, full contact training for a few weeks. Once he's confirmed fit enough to play a full game, that game may as well be in the seniors. Use a managed time reserves game to assess his touch and confidence.
Gives Charlie a run of 5 games at the end of the year. 4 of them in Victoria, and all of those under the roof at Marvel. North, St Kilda, Gold Coast, Port, GWS. It's about as good a run as you could ask for him.
Straight into the seniors after 2 years out and half a VFL game?
Snowball's chance.
I spoke to my mate that I've referenced a few times (S&C in the AFLW for a big four club / previously at U18's boys development) regarding VFL / AFL workloads. He reckons the benefit of the VFL is being able to get a half of footy into the player (then chuck them on ice), and that the club would've already done their due dilligence in terms of load/stress testing on the prior compromised ligament. The relationship between injuries and the top level of footy isn't due to time out of the game, but fatigue. The incidence of an injury is somewhat more common when a player is fatigued, therefore - the strenuous running at AFL level can be responsible for a higher incidence of soft tissue injuries.
I'm paraphrasing hugely here, but that is basically why you'd play a half of Footy, then a game; then consider AFL - rather than a half in the VFL, then straight into the AFL. Obviously, Andrew Russell is the industry guru so whatever he does is probably going to be correct.
Believe it's moreso about them having the option to give him 50% game time over 4 quarters is the logic - I don't actually know, I don't work in S&C but given my friends understanding and position (he's been offered roles in the lower tier English Football competitions too) I have no reason not to trust him.I'm not seeing a reason to play a full VFL game in any of that.
Can get just as fatigued playing VFL as AFL, grounds would generally be in worse condition. Sure, you can pull the player from the field early if they take a bit of a knock, but you can do that at AFL level with a sub too.
Factor in that Charlie can be brought back in to play out of the square and the fatigue issue is mitigated even further as well. Give Harry more license to roam up the ground and drag his brother with him, and let Charlie wrestle Tarrant close to goal.
If he's considered fit enough to run out a full game and isn't dropping marks and shanking kicks, why shouldn't that game be in the seniors?
Believe it's moreso about them having the option to give him 50% game time over 4 quarters is the logic - I don't actually know, I don't work in S&C but given my friends understanding and position (he's been offered roles in the lower tier English Football competitions too) I have no reason not to trust him.
Seems consistent with how most players are handled when they come back from injury.
Your not the only one who is scared, as I don`t see the point, and the risk of him playing a month of reserves games and then 3 senior games, when they could get him cheery ripe over summer for season 2022 without as "much" chance of an injury....although we all know Charlie and his off season habits, so perhaps he would be safer in the twos?!!!I am so effin excited.
And also so effin scared.
Your not the only one who is scared, as I don`t see the point, and the risk of him playing a month of reserves games and then 3 senior games, when they could get him cheery ripe over summer for season 2022 without as "much" chance of an injury....although we all know Charlie and his off season habits, so perhaps he would be safer in the twos?!!!
Your good Blue__Balls - I can't answer without talking out of my ass though! I might see if my mate would ever be interested in answering questions like this on BF. Because clearly I can't refute people's points as my high-level understanding can only take me so far haha!
I'm refuting the concept in general. Nothing against you.I gave my reasoning, feel free to actually refute that.
He's in fantastic shape, will have had months of conditioning and fitness work, more than a month of skills training, and weeks of full contact training. If after a half of footy in the reserves he's considered to have both the fitness to run out a full game and the touch/confidence to play his role, what value is there in holding him back?
It just seems to go against industry standard and there's usually a very good reason for the industry standard. There's a big difference between VFL and AFL. The speed, the physicality, the demands on the body. Doc played round 1 after a 2 year lay-off, but he had the benefit of a proper preseason and playing 80% game time in two Marsh series preseason games, which don't always have full strength squads or the same intensity.Would be interesting to hear from someone in the industry for sure.
There may well be considerations I haven't thought of, I'm just seeing a very straightforward equation whereby a player needs to tick the "four quarter fit" box and "remembers how to play" box, and if both boxes are ticked then they'd be eligible for senior selection. If they're not fully fit, play managed minutes again in the reserves. If they're woefully out of touch, play more reserves.
Beyond that you'd get into player v. player form considerations, but we don't really have to worry about that with our key forward stocks, do we
Some whispers about that Charlie may be in line to play half a game of footy this weekend in the VFL.
Sam Edmund reporting on SEN this morning his sources say if not this weekend, definitely next weekend.
Charlie Curnow | Knee | "A chance to play VFL in the upcoming weeks." Update: 6 July |
Russell hinting next few weeks. Very much doubt this weekend. This thread went too early.