Christian Porter

Remove this Banner Ad

Yeah, pretty sure you 'win' this battle.

Turning a blind eye whilst knowing someone is being beaten and r*ped is pathetic and disgraceful. Regardless of the time and culture.

And you think that is a lesser evil than suggesting some women lie sometimes?

Wow.

Don't about winning shit. It's about the notion people have that the presumption is the girl is usually lying. More often than not they are not. It's either people think it's none of their business, there is nothing they can do, they think the girl is lying, or the "good bloke" scenario.

There is a lot of shit I look back with regret in my highschool days, this is one of them
 
I don't even know what was in the email. I'm now assuming it was negative? It all seems vague.
The age said in the email she told staff the decision to offer advice to Porter had not followed the ‘consultation or approval process‘. That had it done so, ‘we would have considered the matter through the lens of our purpose and values’. She apologised to the staff who might be experiencing pain over ‘the nature of this matter’, and that she too had been ‘triggered’. That she, like them, only found out about the decision on Twitter/media. ..
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Tell me The Cryptkeeper, do you only reserve your moral outrage for LNP sexual assault allegations, but deem actual ALP sexual assaults as being unworthy of your attention?

Because I'll tell you something that is undeniably disgusting, and that is selectively moralising about something as serious as rape JUST BECAUSE IT SUITS YOUR PERSONAL POLITICAL ****ING BIASES!!!!
 
As Snake has already said... 'And so you should'.


We have all done things we're not proud about mate.

Ned is generally a good guy and doesn't deserve the knife turned any further.

I'm confident he would act now.
 
Because they don't exist?
Oooo.

Dude. For someone who blathers on about studies and data as if you're the only one who ever opened a book, you sure do like to completely ignore those things when it suits you.
 
Tell me The Cryptkeeper, do you only reserve your moral outrage for LNP sexual assault allegations, but deem actual ALP sexual assaults as being unworthy of your attention?

Because I'll tell you something that is undeniably disgusting, and that is selectively moralising about something as serious as rape JUST BECAUSE IT SUITS YOUR PERSONAL POLITICAL ****ING BIASES!!!!

No, unlike grubs such as yourself I consider any sexual assault as deplorable. Unfortunately due to people like you who cast aspersions on such claims, far too many people who have suffered such assault don't come forward. I never even mentioned Christian Porter so you have exposed your own pathetic bias there you tit.

There, I have now also answered the question that you refuse to. People like you are exactly the reason why the abused stay silent. They fear that they will not be believed and you have just proven their point.

Pig.
 
Oooo.

Dude. For someone who blathers on about studies and data as if you're the only one who ever opened a book, you sure do like to completely ignore those things when it suits you.

Would you care to point out how my response is incorrect?
 
No, unlike grubs such as yourself I consider any sexual assault as deplorable. Unfortunately due to people like you who cast aspersions on such claims, far too many people who have suffered such assault don't come forward. I never even mentioned Christian Porter so you have exposed your own pathetic bias there you tit.

There, I have now also answered the question that you refuse to. People like you are exactly the reason why the abused stay silent. They fear that they will not be believed and you have just proven their point.

Pig.

Yeah whatever.

I see straight through your fake bullshit.

You look like a right idiot right now, and what's more, you deserve it.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I can't answer any logical fallacies.



Because they don't exist?

Now my turn, if I put the words "Sarah Henderson", "Milton Orkopoulos", "Sim Singh-Malhi", "Luke Foley" and "Jamie Clements" in to the Bigfooty search engine, along with the username "The Cryptkeeper"............would I get any hits?

You really are a disgusting bottomfeeder.
 
Yeah whatever.

I see straight through your fake bullshit.

You look like a right idiot right now, and you deserve it.

How so you ingrate?

I never mentioned Porter and I never mentioned the government. You walked into that all by yourself you intellectual minnow.

And you have exposed yourself as a disgrace in the process.
 
Porter has been (is being?) referred to the legal practice board of WA to determine if he is fit to practice law.

What I am hearing is, this would be seen as fairly normal for a lawyer facing this sort of accusations.

Could we end up with an AG stripped of the right to practice law as he has been stripped by a legal practice board as unfit?

On moto g(6) plus using BigFooty.com mobile app

Whilst I thankfully have no first hand experience of dealing with a legal practice board i have heard how they operate generally - from those who have represented others. As you would imagine they are pretty strict in how they view matters. But also strict in their legalistic interpretation.

Unless other facts arise, right now we have an allegation that didn’t make it to a police complaint. My guess is a legal practice board would be even more disinclined than me to look at it further. There is simply nothing to review. Unless other events/behaviours came to light I couldn’t see how it gets to any sort of hearing.

But good attention for a couple of community-minded academics from Melbourne. If the WA legal practice board is anything like their premier not sure how interested they will be in the submissions from a couple of lecturers from Melbourne!


On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
 
Any danger of turning your attention to the fellow who stood by and watched in silence whilst a young lady was beaten up and r*ped for a year (amongst other incidents), or is he ok because he sits on the right side of the political fence?

Oh, look over there....I get it. :rolleyes:

They guy in question has already expressed his sorrow for not intervening. He can't do much more than that so many years later.

So I think I will stick with old mate who seems to think that sexual assault victims, by and large are liars.
 
I don't even know what was in the email. I'm now assuming it was negative? It all seems vague.

I haven't read the whole email (as far as I know the entirety hasn't been released), but it hasn't been denied that it included the following:

"did not go through the Firm’s due consultation or approval process. Had it done so, we would have considered the matter through the lens of our Purpose and our Values”

and

"The nature of this matter is clearly causing hurt to some of you, and it has certainly triggered hurt for me. I know that for many it may be a tough day, and I want to apologise for the pain you may be experiencing.”

I doubt anyone would have taken too kindly to an internal dispute being aired to thousands of his colleagues before it was raised with him, let alone the implication he had caused hurt to some of them and acted in a manner against the firms values.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Christian Porter

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top