Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Had BRE pleaded not changed his not guilty Huntingdale plea to guilty pre-CSK trial, we might have got to here from some of BRE's Telstra workmates in 1988, about what they thought of BRE coming into work the day or days after Valentines day 1988, with any remnants to scratches on his face.Edwards hesitated when she told him she loved him, then when she reached behind and realised it was not her partner, she dug her nail into his face.
(It was Valentine's Day
Yes BFew, a bike accident as it happened overnight. Unless they had a cat and could say it jumped on him whilst he was asleep and he startled it? Had you heard of this scratching incident before, as I hadn't?Had BRE pleaded not changed his not guilty Huntingdale plea to guilty pre-CSK trial, we might have got to here from some of BRE's Telstra workmates in 1988, about what they thought of BRE coming into work the day or days after Valentines day 1988, with any remnants to scratches on his face.
I wonder how BRE might have explained this if teased or questioned about this by his workmates and family?
Did he or his family have any pets in 1988, like a parrot or a cat to assist try and explain away the scratches?
Wouldn't be surprised if he just blamed it on a biking accident.
I do not recall having read this before.Yes BFew, a bike accident as it happened overnight. Unless they had a cat and could say it jumped on him whilst he was asleep and he startled it? Had you heard of this scratching incident before, as I hadn't?
Had you heard of this scratching incident before, as I hadn't?
Terrific BFew, thanks for sharing. I ask again, was a swab taken from the victim's nail? I think she'd mention that she'd deeply scratched her attacker to police when they came?The West's 22 Dec trial to date summary article reported that the Huntingdale victim
'was shocked to feel stubble and instantly realised it was not her boyfriend', but omitted the bit about the fingernail to face evidence which is summarised in the 619 CSK trial verdict document by Justice Hall below and refers to it as
'She dug or jabbed her fingernail into the man's cheek as hard as she could.'
Huntingdale offences
AH – evidence summary
451 AH gave evidence about the offences committed against her by the accused on 14 February 1988. On that date she was 18 years old and was living with her parents and two brothers at a house on Bullfinch Street, Southern River. She knew of the accused because his younger brother was friends with her two brothers and the accused's mother was her netball coach. She also attended the same primary school and high school as the accused.[290]
452 AH had been out with her boyfriend on the day of the offence and she returned to the house at 6.30 pm. She went to bed at around 10.30 or 11.00 pm. She slept with her head at the end of the bed, on her stomach with her hands under the pillow.
453 During the night AH felt something on top of her, which woke her up. She felt that she could not push up and that something was pressing either side of her from her waist below her arms, against her body. She felt a hand come over and be held against her mouth. She said 'It's okay. I won't scream' because she thought that her boyfriend had come back inside the house. She felt another hand come onto the back of her head; one hand was pushing up and one hand was pushing down.
454 AH moved her head from side to side, stopped, moved again and then stopped again, because she was waiting for the person who she thought was her boyfriend to take his hands off her. She said 'what are you doing?' and 'let go of me'. She felt the hand come off the back of her head and the weight of the person shift like he was reaching behind. Then the person moved his other hand and she felt that he had some fabric in his left hand. She noted that the right hand was calloused.
455 AH moved her mouth slightly to the side and said 'I love you'. She then felt the pressure came off her back a little so she could pull her hand out from under the pillow. She raised her hand up in order to stroke his face. As her finger touched his face she felt stubble and realised that it was not her boyfriend's face because she knew that her boyfriend had shaved that day. She dug or jabbed her fingernail into the man's cheek as hard as she could.
456 The man got off her and AH heard a tiny patter; she said he was very light as he landed on the carpet of her room. She put her hands over her head and braced for about four seconds because she thought that he was going to hit her. She turned her head slightly to the side to see who was standing there and did not see anyone so she pushed up on her elbow and looked back over her right shoulder towards her bedroom door. She saw a man standing in her doorway facing towards her. He was almost as tall as the doorframe and was wearing something like a long‑sleeved white cotton nightie.
457 AH said that for 'half a heartbeat' she and the man stared at each other in the dark and then she turned around and hammered on her wall and screamed for her dad. As she turned back the accused took off. She heard a bang and a few seconds later her father and then her mother came into the room and turned the lights on. There was some light in her room from the street light at the front of the house, which came through because her curtains did not close properly.
458 AH found a kimono lying on her bed along the wall, as well as some black knotted stockings and another piece of material. The police arrived and seized the kimono, stockings and piece of material.'
I know bloody auto correct and I went back in and corrected it, but you're too bloody quick!I really hope BRE was the only Black Swan in his family.
Maybe if there was a Swan attached to his nail, any DNA WAPOL would have got from under the Huntingdale victim's nails would have pointed to a Swan as being the culprit
Was the lack of reporting of the Huntingdale victim having claimedly dug her nails into BRE's face during the attack, and no mail clippings being taken, deemed by media editors as being potentially so embarrassing to WAPOL, that all but one lone media article (Nine Entertainment) reported on this part of the incident?The scratch DNA SWAB would have been crucial to the case I would have thought? I know DNA was in its infancy (1988 was same year in UK DNA first used to solve a criminal case), but surely they took nail scrapings in that era?
No current season stats available
Gotcha!Was the lack of reporting of the Huntingdale victim having claimedly dug her nails into BRE's face during the attack, and no mail clippings being taken, deemed by media editors as being potentially so embarrassing to WAPOL, that all but one lone media article (Nine Entertainment) reported on this part of the incident?
Hopefully not, and it's just a case of detective work procedures at the time not including taking nail clippings of living victims and/or all the other media reporters in the court room not listening carefully enough when writing their blog posts, or upon hearing it, silently going "wow", and wondering the same thing as you, and erring on the side of caution, leaving it out of their live blogs.
Maybe someone can ask Tim Clarkeand his CSK team about this at the upcoming public (ticketed) launch of his CSK book (which will have a Q&A session that is being recorded for a West Australian newspaper CSK podcast), and why his team appeared to fail to report on this (assuming that it was not discussed in one of their Podcasts already).PLAYERCARDSTARTTim Clarke
- Age
- 42
- Ht
- 177cm
- Wt
- 77kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 17.1
- 4star
- K
- 8.2
- 3star
- HB
- 8.9
- 5star
- M
- 4.8
- 5star
- T
- 2.2
- 4star
No current season stats available
- D
- 13.4
- 4star
- K
- 6.0
- 3star
- HB
- 7.4
- 5star
- M
- 3.2
- 4star
- T
- 2.2
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
The "n" inscribed on my keyboard letter "n" is so worn out, and looking like it could be any letter of the alpha(male)bet, that being next door to "M", my nails often get lost in the mail, and I too often end up with a plague of "mice", and lots of "bite"Gotcha!
"no mail clippings "
Even the best of us have "sausage fingers"!
Oh how exciting BFew that something I stumbled on might be useful!Was the lack of reporting of the Huntingdale victim having claimedly dug her nails into BRE's face during the attack, and no mail clippings being taken, deemed by media editors as being potentially so embarrassing to WAPOL, that all but one lone media article (Nine Entertainment) reported on this part of the incident?
Hopefully not, and it's just a case of detective work procedures at the time not including taking nail clippings of living victims, and/or all the other media reporters in the court room not listening carefully enough when writing their blog posts, or upon hearing it, silently going "wow", and wondering the same thing as you, and erring on the side of caution, leaving it out of their live blogs.
Maybe someone can ask Tim Clarkeand his CSK team about this at the upcoming public (ticketed) launch of his CSK book (which will have a Q&A session that is being recorded for a West Australian newspaper CSK podcast), and why his team appeared to fail to report on this (assuming that it was not discussed in one of their Podcasts already).PLAYERCARDSTARTTim Clarke
- Age
- 42
- Ht
- 177cm
- Wt
- 77kg
- Pos.
- Mid
CareerSeasonLast 5
- D
- 17.1
- 4star
- K
- 8.2
- 3star
- HB
- 8.9
- 5star
- M
- 4.8
- 5star
- T
- 2.2
- 4star
No current season stats available
- D
- 13.4
- 4star
- K
- 6.0
- 3star
- HB
- 7.4
- 5star
- M
- 3.2
- 4star
- T
- 2.2
- 4star
PLAYERCARDEND
I am not aware of any action over it but i did some digging and discovered this legislation. I am not sure if it is retrospective though, not quite sure what is meant by "Part" in section 77.Is there any legal action being taken at the moment? in regards to the samples being destroyed. If not, why not? I can't understand how this has been allowed to happen! It is so not right!
It is quite hard to scratch through a beard and the beard itself would hide the scratch or mark.Had BRE pleaded not changed his not guilty Huntingdale plea to guilty pre-CSK trial, we might have got to here from some of BRE's Telstra workmates in 1988, about what they thought of BRE coming into work the day or days after Valentines day 1988, with any remnants to scratches on his face.
I wonder how BRE might have explained this if teased or questioned about this by his workmates and family?
Did he or his family have any pets in 1988, like a parrot or a cat to assist try and explain away the scratches?
Wouldn't be surprised if he just blamed it on a biking accident.
Sarah spent time speaking with the bouncers downstairs though & presumably waiting for a cab to turn up at the rank there. Then the walk from CBV to the phone box would have taken her 5 mins max at a slow walk. Cab arrived 3 mins later so she wasnt out walking the street alone for 30mins.She went to leave about 1.30am then called for a taxi from a phone box at 2.06am but vanished by the time it arrived minutes later.
Her friends left the club about 2.15am."
(I had no idea of the time gap with SS, 1.30 -2.06 am before she called a taxi, so that's over half an hour of walking along on her own. And the fact that tragically her friends left the club just 9 minutes after she called the taxi!)
I think it was just stubble OES, not a full beard. He didn't grow a beard till 2nd marriage according to Wife 2. IIRC. He was always clean shaven.It is quite hard to scratch through a beard and the beard itself would hide the scratch or mark.
I had a car radiator explode in my face once. i had a beard the time. The burn marks and scabbing were barely visible through the beard. If it wasn't for the damage to the bare parts of my face people wouldn't have believed me if I told em.
The DNA was on the kimono in the pathwest lab on 19Feb88. They examined it on 01Mar88 but sent nothing off for testing. On 30Mar88 they returned it to cops where it stayed until 16Nov16 when it went back to pathwest & was DNA tested for the 1st time on 23Nov16.Another thing that went through my mind was that H victim said the kimono was lying on the bed next to the wall? So how could cops be sure it was BRE's stain/s on it as couldn't he technically have pinched it from someone else? The scratch DNA SWAB would have been crucial to the case I would have thought? I know DNA was in its infancy (1988 was same year in UK DNA first used to solve a criminal case), but surely they took nail scrapings in that era?
It was his first wife that mentioned the beard, it was after she got the horse so around 1992 but yeah it's post the Huntingdale Attack as you said.I think it was just stubble OES, not a full beard. He didn't grow a beard till 2nd marriage according to Wife 2. IIRC. He was always clean shaven.
There is no evidence of BRE having a beard during the Huntingdale attack.It is quite hard to scratch through a beard and the beard itself would hide the scratch or mark.
I have heard this before but find it absolutely bizarre that ss's taxi ended up taking her friends home....safely!Sarah spent time speaking with the bouncers downstairs though & presumably waiting for a cab to turn up at the rank there. Then the walk from CBV to the phone box would have taken her 5 mins max at a slow walk. Cab arrived 3 mins later so she wasnt out walking the street alone for 30mins.
The real bummer is that the taxi that couldn't find her drove around to CBV & waited a few minutes for a fare then ended up taking SS's friends home to Monument St Mosman Park. They got there around 2.25am so they were home by the time the screams were heard in the same area by others.
Well here's something I hadn't read before. It was on a website where the JR video had ironically been removed!
"W.A. Police had to justify why it took so long to put this evidence before the public, and why it was an exclusive on a commercial television channel. At the time of the announcement, the Sunday Times of Perth indignantly asked to be given the footage immediately, and were refused. They also asked if there was a deal: “Det-Sgt Stanbury denied that Foxtel, the Crime Investigation Network or producers Graham McNiece Productions had a contractual deal with WA Police for an exclusive story”. BBM
JUSTICE STILL AWAITS! The many investigations & suspects of the Claremont Serial Killings as Bradley Robert Edwards to face trial this year
IN DEPTH: 2019 may be the year the Claremont Serial Killings are finally solved, with prime suspect, Bradley Robert Edwards, to face trial in May. Therese Taylor, takes an in-depth look at all the …truecrimenewsweekly.com
The disability allowance was discussed in the trial thread #1 after having come up in the West's 4 Dec 2019 Live Blog (see post #8174)According to the evidence from Telstra records, Edwards claimed something to do with disability on 25 January 1996.
434. ...... He claimed two
allowances in relation to work on 25 January 1996 (disability and field cable allowances).