Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I visit relatives in Karrakatta and where the KK attack was, is sandy and back around the maintenance area. Where Jane is, is a lovely lawned Rose Garden and Ciara is in beautiful lawned area as well.
3rd Feb I think given all the public holidays.Is today the day that the Appeal window closes? I think it is from memory, in which case........
I visit Jane often as she's really close to others I go to see. Her memorial changes all the time. The birds love to pull flowers out, artificial or fresh, they don't care whose they are!I visit relatives in Karrakatta and where the KK attack was, is sandy and back around the maintenance area. Where Jane is, is a lovely lawned Rose Garden and Ciara is in beautiful lawned area as well.
I recall back during the trial, another pair of undies was mentioned, but Christian reported they were handed in in 2003....Maybe the same pair, just wrong dates initially??Ciara's underwear.
The underwear, later DNA-linked to Ms Glennon and bearing her handwritten initials on the tag, was suspected to have been a spare pair inside the lawyer’s missing work bag, which she had with her the night she vanished.
Detectives believe Claremont killer visited victim's grave but avoided CCTV trap, new book reveals
The graveyard visitor left behind an item of the victim's underwear three-and-a-half years after she vanished off the streets of Claremont.www.watoday.com.au
I was about to go and search for what I faintly recalled was an earlier reference to undies handed in.I recall back during the trial, another pair of undies was mentioned, but Christian reported they were handed in in 2003....Maybe the same pair, just wrong dates initially??
Was anyone in CSK court this week on Thursday and can assist make sense of the above revelation by Bret Christian today?
Possibly all Ciara's underwear (not from the night she was murdered) was sent off for testing in 2004.
Maybe to look for any non Ciara DNA on them.
Where this specific handed in 2003 underwear came from, and why it was reportedly only handed into WAPOL in 2003, is a mystery that will probably forever remain a mystery (for privacy reasons).
Maybe at the time it was just an attempt to see who the owner of the undies might have been having relationships with, that was not known to WAPOL at that point in time. To identify other possible POI.
Code for : It doesnt fit our narrative
Well it is highly irrelevant. No one knows who handed them in, who handled them, if they wore gloves, if they were male. No one knows when the underpants were worn. No ones knows who the DNA belongs to. No one knows how old it is. No one knows if its even male, just the possibility of been male. No one has suggested that its a semen stain. No one has mentioned who tested it.
Interesting that Yovich has mentioned that the defense would challenge the chain of custody of other exhibits.....They may continue it when the present their defense but did Hall allow it??? Cant see if he did or didnt
It may have been a line item in some inventory document that wasn't redacted? I don't think Yovich can tender documents at this stage? Of if he can I can't remember seeing him do it.
Well said LAM and timely as I'm going through a terrible battle at the moment for justice for my husband who died suddenly in December 2020. Thank you for sharing this, it means a lot to me, bless ya.
Was everyone assuming that BRE put those underpants there in 2000 or 2003?
Thank you K.I can only imagine how hard it must be for you, sending love and white light your way. x
Have we got this from a named WAPOL source in an official capacity on the case?We were told a repeat visitor put her undies there in 2000.
Have we got this from a named WAPOL source in an official capacity on the case?
Or is this still media speculation about the repeat visitor.
The amount of times he mentions the Post in the book is ridiculous to be honest. I saw he mentioned another publication (once, so far) but follows that up with a quote from the Post.Absolutely shameless self-promotion from Bret Christian today in the weekly 'Post' newspaper, where he writes a love letter to himself and spruiks that his new release book is for sale outside Barchetta in Cottesloe tomorrow (Saturday) where he (and not BRE) will be personally signing copies from 10am to midday.
Not sure how he will sign the kindle versions.
Maybe BYO engraving tool.
This post is too advertorial for the Media thread.
Not controversial enough for the Bunker.
My Verdict of what I've read in this book so far, (bits from different sections) is that it's an invaluable resource for those still following the case.
(Hence this post is in the Verdict thread)
View attachment 1044330
A Kindle search of the book comes up with 350 matches to the word 'Post'.The amount of times he mentions the Post in the book is ridiculous to be honest. I saw he mentioned another publication (once, so far) but follows that up with a quote from the Post.
Good on you for coming forward !! Hopefully others will follow now you have made this public xx
so if you were to report an indecent exposure down that embankment do you just call crime stoppers or is there another preferred way?
The Murdoch media bogan State newspapers are running a paywalled online story today, attempting to parallel Ivan Milat with BRE.
Hopefully someone will be able to get access to them or they will be in the paper versions today or tomorrow's Sunday paper versions.
I speculate that the Milat link they report, is that BRE has gone to jail with the full extent of his victims unknown, and him refusing to divulge what else he has done, and his denials of some of his crimes.
View attachment 1048309
JWS2019 has posted the link for this in the media thread, much appreciated and I've found it really interesting so thought I should give it a plug in here as well. Andrew Rule might be a bit more across this case than we might have thought given he's from Melbourne.
I hope he does a series because he has some of the same questions we have.
No longer have access unfortunatelyThe Murdoch media bogan State newspapers are running a paywalled online story today, attempting to parallel Ivan Milat with BRE.
Hopefully someone will be able to get access to them or they will be in the paper versions today or tomorrow's Sunday paper versions.
I speculate that the Milat link they report, is that BRE has gone to jail with the full extent of his victims unknown, and him refusing to divulge what else he has done, and his denials of some of his crimes.
View attachment 1048309
JWS2019 has posted the link for this in the media thread, much appreciated and I've found it really interesting so thought I should give it a plug in here as well. Andrew Rule might be a bit more across this case than we might have thought given he's from Melbourne.
I hope he does a series because he has some of the same questions we have.
Maybe Foxtel will show it for free, given how much suffrage many WA ppl are facing this week from loss of income due to COVID-19 lockdown for at least 5 days.It shits me that again, it's only on Foxtel. I'll never get to see it