Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 100,555
- 252,171
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #420
Full Presser at the link below.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
I think that opinion is closer to the mark though. We don't want to sack him because of the payout and because he is a Hawthorn legend. But if he could leave earlier there would be some that wouldn't disappointed to see him gono one quoted, just "sources"
regurgitating same old opinion pieces, dressing it up as news.
They need to hit the weekly quota for articles and clicks
no one quoted, just "sources"
regurgitating same old opinion pieces, dressing it up as news.
They need to hit the weekly quota for articles and clicks
Without a solid source it doesn’t hold much weight however if it is the case it is extremely disrespectful to a loyal legend of the club. I said the club handled this poorly and stand by it.I think that opinion is closer to the mark though. We don't want to sack him because of the payout and because he is a Hawthorn legend. But if he could leave earlier there would be some that wouldn't disappointed to see him go
To be fair, let's wait for the club to come out vehemently to deny it.no one quoted, just "sources"
regurgitating same old opinion pieces, dressing it up as news.
They need to hit the weekly quota for articles and clicks
Well, that's not how a club should be run. You don't come out and deny every terrible article.To be fair, let's wait for the club to come out vehemently to deny it.
Supporters complain all the time about anonymous "sources", but that's the only way people from clubland would talk. Otherwise all news would be sanitised press releases and social media posts. There literally wouldn't be such thing as news.
We saw Caro get pillored by Saints supporters for reporting on what Saints people were saying about Ross and Membry, and low and behold, the Saints came out and basically confirmed it by giving the weakest support of their players imaginable, followed by basically admitting it.
If no one from Hawthorn comes out vigorously defending Clarko, you'd say Tom / Caro is on the money.
To be fair, let's wait for the club to come out vehemently to deny it.
Supporters complain all the time about anonymous "sources", but that's the only way people from clubland would talk. Otherwise all news would be sanitised press releases and social media posts. There literally wouldn't be such thing as news.
We saw Caro get pillored by Saints supporters for reporting on what Saints people were saying about Ross and Membry, and low and behold, the Saints came out and basically confirmed it by giving the weakest support of their players imaginable, followed by basically admitting it.
If no one from Hawthorn comes out vigorously defending Clarko, you'd say Tom / Caro is on the money.
The media would have hated that all these decisions were made weeks ago and no one knew a thing until they were called in for the briefing just before the announcement.At this risk of protracting a debate, clubs are under no obligation to confirm or deny anything that anyone in the media claim - which is why our club is despised by some media identities as we generally simply refuse to play that game.
Look, if you ran into Caro/Barrett or similar AFL media bufoons on the street and asked them about a specific story a month ago, they would struggle to recall the topic - such is the constant cycle and turnover of alleged 'news' that is presented to us...
I think if they are citing "sources" at the club, it's fair to elicit a response.Well, that's not how a club should be run. You don't come out and deny every terrible article.
Non-denial doesn't mean its true.
and none of those sources told Tom for a week that the Board had made a call to not renew Clarko? Yet are now leaking to him about wanting him moved on earlier?I think if they are citing "sources" at the club, it's fair to elicit a response.
I don't want to send the thread down a wrong direction, but I know a lot of journalists (non sport), and rightly or wrongly, the entire profession relies on anonymous sources. Accountability relies on it.
Plenty of people who work at clubs and at board level feed info to journos. This has happened for years and usually serves an agenda.
Tom would have sources at Hawthorn, like Caro, and if he's making it up, then he won't last long in the industry.
and none of those sources told Tom for a week that the Board had made a call to not renew Clarko? Yet are now leaking to him about wanting him moved on earlier?
Of course some media have sources, but in this case, this is just a hot pile of steaming gossip, dressed up as some news to hit a quota of clicks.
I think if they are citing "sources" at the club, it's fair to elicit a response.
I don't want to send the thread down a wrong direction, but I know a lot of journalists (non sport), and rightly or wrongly, the entire profession relies on anonymous sources. Accountability relies on it.
Plenty of people who work at clubs and at board level feed info to journos. This has happened for years and usually serves an agenda.
Tom would have sources at Hawthorn, like Caro, and if he's making it up, then he won't last long in the industry.
These coaching transitions just don't work, everyone knows it it's been proven time and again it's only due to $$$ that it is even being considered.
And still it never leaked to the media!It leaked here before it leaked to the media.
The Magpies have made contact with several possible candidates in recent weeks although it is understood interviews have not begun.
Collingwood is also open to giving a sacked coach a second chance and Voss, Don Pyke (Adelaide 2016-19), Mark Williams (1999-2010) and Ross Lyon (Fremantle 2012-19) all fit that criteria.
Correct weight. Not much of a field is it??
I'm happy that we're giving Mitchell a go ahead of all that crew.
The obvious difference between those scenarios and this one is that Roos wanted to leave and was an active participant in the process.Two year succession:
Melbourne appoint Simon Goodwin as Paul Roos' successor
Simon Goodwin has joined Melbourne’s coaching staff, a move that marks him out as Paul Roos’ successorwww.theguardian.com
Two year succession:
Roos annoints Longmire his successor
Premiership coach says his senior man is well equipped to take over when he eventually moves onwww.afl.com.au