Most commentators and experts are saying that all the evidence points to this being the most clean Tour de France in years. Low positive tests, no unbelievable superhuman/effortless efforts (e.g. Landis), lots of pain evident from all the cyclists.
Eg, see: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/2011-tour-de-france-the-cleanest-in-recent-years
Lo and behold Cadel finally wins one.
Cadel has long been widely believed to be a clean rider. He has campaigned long and hard against performance enhancing drugs himself as did his former coach to whom he dedicated his win. He also has the genetics to back up his status as an elite rider having done tests as a youngster at AIS by the same guy who tested Armstrong indicating he has better athletic/cardio/endurance traits than Armstrong. If anyone is clean - he is.
In past years he has lost out to guys like Contador (failed test), Armstrong (so much circumstancial evidence of use) etc. In fact of all the previous winners only Sastre (who beat Evans into second) has maintained a clean aura.
All through this Cadel copped criticism from many that he was not an attacking rider and wasn't champion material.
I think we are now seeing that Cadel is probably the true champion (Sastre also). He wasn't as attacking because he wasn't on what everyone else was on. He never had much support in the mountains as his teammates were not allowed to get on the gear (Sastre the exception as the Schlecks were his teammates).
Whilst nothing can be certain in the world of professional cycling where cyclists can be years ahead of testers, but Evan's history, the fact he tested as an exceptional athlete when young (i.e. better than Armstrong) and his squeaky clean record allude to the probable fact that he may have been the leading clean rider in multiple tours, not just the one he just won.
Kudos to Cadel. So glad that he now gets recognition and the critics are silenced. He is a true champion.
Really hope Andy Schleck wins one also as he deserves it. Cheater Contador stole one of him when he gained 39secs when Andy's chain slipped (going against Tour convention) - the time he won the tour by over Andy.
Eg, see: http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/2011-tour-de-france-the-cleanest-in-recent-years
Lo and behold Cadel finally wins one.
Cadel has long been widely believed to be a clean rider. He has campaigned long and hard against performance enhancing drugs himself as did his former coach to whom he dedicated his win. He also has the genetics to back up his status as an elite rider having done tests as a youngster at AIS by the same guy who tested Armstrong indicating he has better athletic/cardio/endurance traits than Armstrong. If anyone is clean - he is.
In past years he has lost out to guys like Contador (failed test), Armstrong (so much circumstancial evidence of use) etc. In fact of all the previous winners only Sastre (who beat Evans into second) has maintained a clean aura.
All through this Cadel copped criticism from many that he was not an attacking rider and wasn't champion material.
I think we are now seeing that Cadel is probably the true champion (Sastre also). He wasn't as attacking because he wasn't on what everyone else was on. He never had much support in the mountains as his teammates were not allowed to get on the gear (Sastre the exception as the Schlecks were his teammates).
Whilst nothing can be certain in the world of professional cycling where cyclists can be years ahead of testers, but Evan's history, the fact he tested as an exceptional athlete when young (i.e. better than Armstrong) and his squeaky clean record allude to the probable fact that he may have been the leading clean rider in multiple tours, not just the one he just won.
Kudos to Cadel. So glad that he now gets recognition and the critics are silenced. He is a true champion.
Really hope Andy Schleck wins one also as he deserves it. Cheater Contador stole one of him when he gained 39secs when Andy's chain slipped (going against Tour convention) - the time he won the tour by over Andy.