barrackers
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 4, 2016
- 12,304
- 22,075
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
One positive is that the AFL have learnt from their previous mistake and placed a hard cap on the number of players a club can lose via this scheme. The flip side is the expansion was clearly premature from a depth of talent perspective.Sydney are the single club able to offer extended deals.
I think Sydney would be highly unlikely to go past the teams ranked 8-11 unless they attract several superstars.
Much more likely is that they get 2-3 good players and instead increase their percentage into the 60’s which is good for the comp.
For the other clubs inducing players has proven tough due to other football and life priorities and this is just extending the expansion signings period from 1 to 2 seasons and providing some mechanism for evening up the comp and making matches more even.
The AFL is rightfully criticised about many things but is there a better way of going about spreading talent across the AFLW because not many are offering criticism while offering better solutions to the problem.
In terms of solutions:
Players with existing contracts should be off limit to any pre-signing period.
On this note all clubs should be able to offer longer contracts so that they can build their culture.
The hard cap should also include player tiers, two stars is too much for a mid table team to lose, ditto 5 players for a top team.
Why is Port the only club who can pre-sign an underage player, if this is an option to spread talent why not offer it the other 3 clubs.
The state based drafts seems to be a limiting factor in equally distributing talent, for now I get why we have it while the competition remains part time. It does open up opportunities to top up these four clubs though. Instead of simply re-raiding other clubs the AFL could have allocated 3rd party deals and longer contracts to entice draftees interstate. Similarly this could be made available to state league players.
I’m never a fan of AFL decided compensation as the closed rules makes it open to scepticism, instead clubs should be given extra draft picks over the next two drafts to trade for these players. With this draft having a smaller pool of players future picks as compo would likely be more palpable.