Well,that’s one name we can cross off our list of possible recruits.And probably a good thing too.Lycett to retire, so will not be wasting a list spot on him View attachment 1842438
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well,that’s one name we can cross off our list of possible recruits.And probably a good thing too.Lycett to retire, so will not be wasting a list spot on him View attachment 1842438
Well,that’s one name we can cross off our list of possible recruits.And probably a good thing too.
Thank f**k for that!Lycett to retire, so will not be wasting a list spot on him View attachment 1842438
Here are some highlights.
No, he said that he had blurry vision after the tests were over at the start of the second quarter, hence why he went back to the doctors and took himself out of the game.
If he’d had blurry vision immediately after the hit, he’d have told them and they’d have taken him out of the game immediately.
I know you love to think of yourself as some sort of self anointed expert on concussion, but you’re trying to criticise our medicos for the sake of it here. Get off your soapbox, take a seat and let the real doctors that the club employs make the calls on Murphy. They’re in a far better position to do so than you are.
If Henry was worth pick 25 after playing 25 games over two years and kicking 28 goals, I’m looking forward to Geelong accepting a 2nd rounder/early third for Jhye ClarkeOne way to look at Henry is he set up a premiership. We took him for two years, developed him a little then on the trading table relieved Hawthorn of the burden of Tom Mitchell who won a flag for us.
On your last sentence, he said that he wasn't feeling unwell when he had the test (which he does know by heart) and he didn't have the blurry vision until after the test. That's when he came clean and he was ruled out.
Medical science isn't perfect and who said that the concussion test is the only thing that they rely upon? They would have checked pupil dilation for starters and various other physical tests.
If the symptom are delayed then they are delayed.
So rather than using protocols, you're advocating for the Kappa vibe to run the show?So you support the decision to send Murphy back onto the field after getting smashed on the jaw at full speed and rolling around on the ground holding his head for 30 seconds? For a bloke who regularly gets concussed? You seriously think that's a smart move for his long term health? Yes or no. Everyone with a brain knew at that moment he was concussed, it was obvious, and he was.
This may shock some people but you actually can disagree with someone who has a medical degree, to deny that is an appeal to authority fallacy.
I said at the time he was concussed and shouldn't of come back on, I was right. I said Paddy McCartin shouldn't of been allowed to come back, I was right. Maybe when the experts are getting it so badly wrong we need to discuss it, no?
He said he knows it off by heart, but knowing the questions off by heart won’t help you pass the test.Didn’t Murphy say he can pass the test because he knows it off by heart? And that he had blurry vision immediately after the hit? (Concussion symptom)
So rather than using protocols, you're advocating for the Kappa vibe to run the show?
P.S. Why are you declaring that you were right with Paddy?
Yeah fair chance.No, if you read what I said the answer was using a bit of common sense, like when a guy with a massive concussion history gets smashed in the jaw, when he wasn't expecting it, you should probably expect a concussion, no?
We could be considering Sam Hayes from Port. He was delisted today. 205cm player, ruck, played four games ...
Sounds very underwhelmingWe could be considering Sam Hayes from Port. He was delisted today. 205cm player, ruck, played four games ...
Oh, you knew did you Dr Kappa? Congratulations on your armchair diagnosing skills, you truly are a marvel.So you support the decision to send Murphy back onto the field after getting smashed on the jaw at full speed and rolling around on the ground holding his head for 30 seconds? For a bloke who regularly gets concussed? You seriously think that's a smart move for his long term health? Yes or no. Everyone with a brain knew at that moment he was concussed, it was obvious, and he was.
You can disagree all you like. Most of the time you’ll be wrong. Because you don’t have a medical degree and are talking out your arse.This may shock some people but you actually can disagree with someone who has a medical degree, to deny that is an appeal to authority fallacy.
You’ve convinced me with your amazing anecdotes about being right Kappa. I’ll never trust a medical professional again.I said at the time he was concussed and shouldn't have come back on, I was right. I said Paddy McCartin shouldn't have been allowed to come back, I was right. Maybe when the experts are getting it so badly wrong we need to discuss it, no?
We don’t need another project ruck unless Begg converts to a full time key position player.We could be considering Sam Hayes from Port. He was delisted today. 205cm player, ruck, played four games ...
He isn't 25 until June next year, so, at least age wise, he is better than Lycett, who we were supposed to be interested in.Rendall rated Hayes very highly - remember a few times on trade radio mentioning Hayes and not being fussed re Grundy.
To me it's more about the attitude and work ethic of Hayes. That part I am not sure of and don't know enough.
Hayes is more credentialled than Darcy Cameron was when he was recruited?
So yeah if the attitude and personality is right then would be handy depth.
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
Hayes isn't a project ruck. He's 24 and ready to play now. At the end of the day, he's more ready than Beggy to fill in at AFL level.We don’t need another project ruck unless Begg converts to a full time key position player.
We were keen on him last year and I think he may have done a medical at the club but we chose not to pursue the trade.Rendall rated Hayes very highly - remember a few times on trade radio mentioning Hayes and not being fussed re Grundy.
To me it's more about the attitude and work ethic of Hayes. That part I am not sure of and don't know enough.
Hayes is more credentialled than Darcy Cameron was when he was recruited?
So yeah if the attitude and personality is right then would be handy depth.
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
Out of curiosity, what’s this based on? AFL games played? When you’ve only got a handful of games to your name, I’m not sure that the difference of a couple of games is much in the way of credentials. What was Hayes’ SANFL form like? I do remember that Cameron had a very strong year in the twos as a ruck/fwd when we recruited him, if Hayes was just OK at state level it probably says quite a bit about where he’s at vs Cameron when we traded for him.Hayes is more credentialled than Darcy Cameron was when he was recruited?
still haunts me along with that other donkey Vardy who both played above themselves big time in 2018 GF..