Contesting the striking charge...Jack Graham that is.

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

Obviously no intent. But he hit him high. No damage.

So fair.

Except that eh AFL plays funny buggers with the charges all the time. So it was an argument to the actual charge. They effectively admitted that it wasn't intentional. SO logically the charge should have been dropped. But not in the AFL. Oh well. There'll be worse in 2018.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Contesting the striking charge...Jack Graham that is.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top