Health Coronavirus 2020 / Worldwide (Stats live update in OP) Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
No bullahit as you call it, it was there, the sites chop and change down here by the week, one week it's here the next week it's somewhere else.
And they list sites because of that. They update it with “new sites” and “closed sites”

even other posters have suggested they drove past and never saw it. So either bupa removed all reference of it from their website, it was never listed on the DHHS site, the media didn’t report it as a testing site, people drove past and didn’t see it

Or

you’re making shit up
 
How do know you someone they may spread it to in their local area isn't working on the other side of the city?

Please tell me how going to get food at 8:01pm is more dangerous than at 7:59pm.
That is why you need a permit to travel for work and it needs to be work that requires you to be onsite.

The whole point of this is to minimize travel that can be minimized. To keep people home as much as possible.

Most shops are closing at 7:30pm to allow time for customers to return home by the 8pm curfew so I'd suggest anyone out after 8pm claiming it's only a couple of minutes is just trying to push things
 
That is why you need a permit to travel for work and it needs to be work that requires you to be onsite.

The whole point of this is to minimize travel that can be minimized. To keep people home as much as possible.

Most shops are closing at 7:30pm to allow time for customers to return home by the 8pm curfew so I'd suggest anyone out after 8pm claiming it's only a couple of minutes is just trying to push things
It’s a stupid claim anyway. It’s not suggesting the virus is more dangerous at that time. It’s to limit movement, stop people going out for no reason.

it’s like saying “show me evidence that the virus is more dangerous at 5.1km than 5km from my house”

it’s only said by people who don’t understand the purpse
 

Log in to remove this ad.

That is why you need a permit to travel for work and it needs to be work that requires you to be onsite.

The whole point of this is to minimize travel that can be minimized. To keep people home as much as possible.

Most shops are closing at 7:30pm to allow time for customers to return home by the 8pm curfew so I'd suggest anyone out after 8pm claiming it's only a couple of minutes is just trying to push things
I've seen a few edge cases touted on Twitter by numpties.

"My 3 friends live in a share house and all 3 had their girlfriends over for a dinner party of 6 but I can't visit one relative!"
 
I've seen a few edge cases touted on Twitter by numpties.

"My 3 friends live in a share house and all 3 had their girlfriends over for a dinner party of 6 but I can't visit one relative!"
I think those 3 friends would find themselves getting fined if the cops rocked up but yeah
 
From the SMH:

View attachment 938028

It's not just Uncle Rupert putting the boot into Dan, it's most media outlets. Probably because the muppet ******* deserves it.

Uncle Rupert owns a majority of most media in Oz....His agenda of trying to oust Dan, has been explicit now for well on 4 years running....He's twisting this narrative six ways till Sunday in order to push that agenda into hyper-drive.

and we all know what it's prefaced upon......Dan's Belt n Road agreement with the Chinese. That has thus far delivered us to an almost 30% green renewable energy grid, which is projected to reach 50% by 2025 at current estimates.....Suck shit Murdoche.
 
Disagree, under the law/guidelines you can visit you boink buddy.
Don't think the cops could do anything official.
I think you would find that everyone having their partners over at the same time would be seen as breaking the rules

You can only have one person come over for child minding etc, I don't see them looking at this differently
 
Yeah I've not seen anyone reporting as part of their headlines on drop in active cases

Probably because if they report it, it might expose themselves as wanting to push through with the worst aspects of COVID.

I might have my words jumbled up there.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Probably because if they report it, it might expose themselves as wanting to push through with the worst aspects of COVID.

I might have my words jumbled up there.
I think there is limited info most people are interested in and bad news always tends to sell more than good news
 
I think there is limited info most people are interested in and bad news always tends to sell more than good news

As Eric Bischoff once said: Controversy Creates Cash. I believe he had a book of the same title

However it couldn't hurt to provide the full picture every day. Both the bad and the good.
 
I think you would find that everyone having their partners over at the same time would be seen as breaking the rules

You can only have one person come over for child minding etc, I don't see them looking at this differently
Nope, if there are 6 people in the house in share accommodation and all six decide to have their partners over, cops can't do shit.
 
And they list sites because of that. They update it with “new sites” and “closed sites”

even other posters have suggested they drove past and never saw it. So either bupa removed all reference of it from their website, it was never listed on the DHHS site, the media didn’t report it as a testing site, people drove past and didn’t see it

Or

you’re making sh*t up
I think the question is,

Why are you and Gralin refusing to believe it.
 
I think the question is,

Why are you and Gralin refusing to believe it.
Because there is no evidence to support your assertion, it’s not listed as a testing centre, it’s not listed as a closed testing centre, no articles from June list it, and other posters said they drove past and never saw it.

do you believe every wordevery random stranger says online, when there is no evidence to support them
 
Because there is no evidence to support your assertion, it’s not listed as a testing centre, it’s not listed as a closed testing centre, no articles from June list it, and other posters said they drove past and never saw it.

do you believe every wordevery random stranger says online, when there is no evidence to support them
Check the dates and then check when i noticed the testing station, 10:18am this morning i posted in case you need help.

https://media.bupa.com.au/bupa-edithvale-and-sunshine-care-homes-positive-covid-19-tests/
 
Check the dates and then check when i noticed the testing station, 10:18am this morning i posted in case you need help.

https://media.bupa.com.au/bupa-edithvale-and-sunshine-care-homes-positive-covid-19-tests/
Yes. I read that, it was the press release i referred to...

it does not say that bupa edithvale was an open to the public testing site from what I can see. It mentions staff and Residents testing positive.

so your point of this was? When are you claiming they were a public testing site?
 
Check the dates and then check when i noticed the testing station, 10:18am this morning i posted in case you need help.

https://media.bupa.com.au/bupa-edithvale-and-sunshine-care-homes-positive-covid-19-tests/
Just re read. You claimed last week of July it was “definitely” a testing site and it wasn’t just for people on site because there was people lined up on the footpath in street clothes


UPDATE Monday 27 July, 12pm:

We have now received all the second round COVID-19 test results at Bupa Edithvale and can confirm that unfortunately a further six residents and three employees have tested positive.

We are in contact with the residents’ families and their GPs to ensure they are involved in any decisions about their care. As a result of these discussions, all COVID-19 positive residents are being transferred to hospital.

Two of the employees who tested positive have been self-isolating since Monday 20 July and we are in contact with all impacted employees to offer our support. Employees who receive positive test results will not return to the home for at least two weeks.

People can often test negative to COVID-19 in the very early stages of infection, which is why this second round of testing has been so important to pick up these additional cases. We expect a third round of testing will be organised shortly, as per the Public Health Unit’s process.

UPDATE Wednesday 22 July, 11am

We have now received test results for all Edithvale residents. Unfortunately, a further two residents have tested positive to COVID-19.

The two residents remain in our care at the home. We are in close contact with their families and GP to ensure they are receiving the right level of care.

The resident who tested positive on Monday remains in hospital.

We have received the majority of employee test results, and so far, they are all negative.

A second round of testing for residents and employees will occur later this week.

We’re in regular contact with all relatives of the home and we thank them for their ongoing support and well wishes.

Seems like end of July they were testing staff and residents there.

or are you suggesting that they were using it as a testing site, After there was an outbreak there on the 21st of July.

so not only is it not listed anywhere as a testing site, bupa suggest at the dates specified by you they were testing the residents and staff there, you claim it wasn’t just that. But also that you think it was a testing site AFTER the initial outbreak had occurred there? So they were testing people in a residence of positive patients?

EDIT: also we were in stage 3 at that point, which restricted those who were allowed to enter aged care facilities. So not only was it an aged care facility with positive cases, but there was already restrictions on who could enter a facility. But you’re suggesting that it was public testing and that they were lined up on the street?
 
Last edited:
Just re read. You claimed last week of July it was “definitely” a testing site and it wasn’t just for people on site because there was people lined up on the footpath in street clothes


UPDATE Monday 27 July, 12pm:

We have now received all the second round COVID-19 test results at Bupa Edithvale and can confirm that unfortunately a further six residents and three employees have tested positive.

We are in contact with the residents’ families and their GPs to ensure they are involved in any decisions about their care. As a result of these discussions, all COVID-19 positive residents are being transferred to hospital.

Two of the employees who tested positive have been self-isolating since Monday 20 July and we are in contact with all impacted employees to offer our support. Employees who receive positive test results will not return to the home for at least two weeks.

People can often test negative to COVID-19 in the very early stages of infection, which is why this second round of testing has been so important to pick up these additional cases. We expect a third round of testing will be organised shortly, as per the Public Health Unit’s process.

UPDATE Wednesday 22 July, 11am

We have now received test results for all Edithvale residents. Unfortunately, a further two residents have tested positive to COVID-19.

The two residents remain in our care at the home. We are in close contact with their families and GP to ensure they are receiving the right level of care.

The resident who tested positive on Monday remains in hospital.

We have received the majority of employee test results, and so far, they are all negative.

A second round of testing for residents and employees will occur later this week.

We’re in regular contact with all relatives of the home and we thank them for their ongoing support and well wishes.

Seems like end of July they were testing staff and residents there.

or are you suggesting that they were using it as a testing site, After there was an outbreak there on the 21st of July.

so not only is it not listed anywhere as a testing site, bupa suggest at the dates specified by you they were testing the residents and staff there, you claim it wasn’t just that. But also that you think it was a testing site AFTER the initial outbreak had occurred there? So they were testing people in a residence of positive patients?
Think very carefully, if you were DHHS would you list on your website that you set up a covid testing site at an Aged Care Facility, no you wouldn't and if they did they very quickly deleted it. I know what i saw dude so believe what you want.
 
Think very carefully, if you were DHHS would you list on your website that you set up a covid testing site at an Aged Care Facility, no you wouldn't and if they did they very quickly deleted it. I know what i saw dude so believe what you want.
If you wanted to test the residents and staff you probably would
 
Think very carefully, if you were DHHS would you list on your website that you set up a covid testing site at an Aged Care Facility, no you wouldn't and if they did they very quickly deleted it. I know what i saw dude so believe what you want.
That was bupas website.
Media outlets also released lists of testing sites.

So there were lines in the street for it, but it wasn’t listed because DHHS didn’t want people knowing

Nah. You’re bullshitting. You’ve done it previously in your sooks

Let’s see:
1. Not listed as an open testing site
2. Not listed as a closed testing site
3. No media outlet reported it as a testing site
4. Bupa have no mention of it being a testing site
5. Positive cases were already in that home at the time you’re claiming, so you’re suggesting it was a testing site, at the site of an outbreak
6. Restrictions were in place on who could visit aged care at that time
7. Other posters said they never saw it when they drive past it
8. It would be a massive massive failure if it was a testing case, but nowhere has reported it, despite the facility being on a main road that many people would drive past
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top