- Thread starter
- #701
And most of them shouldn’t have had to die from this virus.Article on why Italy death rate with an older population is higher than elsewhere.
A quick search has Australia's 65+ age population in 2018 sitting at 15.7 %
Say it is 16% in 2019 . On Australia's population of 26 million that is 4.16 million seniors
Italy with 23 % of 60 million that is 13.8 million seniors.
Below two sentences from article dated 10/3/19
Italy has one of the oldest populations in the world, with a median age of about 46 years old. Nearly 60% of the population is aged 40 and over, about 23% of which is over 65 – heightening the population’s risk with regards to the novel coronavirus currently spreading through Italy.
According to Italy’s national health institute, the average age of those who have died was 81, and many of the deceased had preexisting health conditions.
Italy, now under lockdown, has been hit hard by the coronavirus outbreak. It also has one of the world's oldest populations with 60% over age 40.
"For better or for worse, we have a very old population," Giovanni Rezza, chief epidemiologist at Italy's national health institute, said on Monday.www.businessinsider.com.au
That’s the ****ing point being lost or ignored in these articles and statistics.
As my 75 year old dad said last night, it’s cheaper in the long run for the government to let it spread slowly through the community than try and stop it.
Because when we’re over the bell curve and on the other side, there’s going to be a lot less old age and disability pensions for the government to pay, and you can bet your last dollar that ScoMo and the treasurer have budgeted this in to recovery over the next few years.