Craig Hutchison

Remove this Banner Ad

Anyone notice on FC last night that he didn't ask Brendan Gale one question? Was it that Brendan Gale knew his business and would bite Hutchison's head off he tried any of the crap he tries with people who are a little weaker?

The guy is a bully and like all bullies he's a coward. At least Wilson stands by agendas and stands on her two feet a little in the paper, on this car crash of a show and on offsiders. Hutchison acts like has the whole 9 network behind him to fight for him.
I did notice that. I have noticed that he starts of the show with all guns loaded having pot shots at Caro and what ever other issue are on the agenda but after he has NOTHING to add to the show
 
Anyone notice on FC last night that he didn't ask Brendan Gale one question? Was it that Brendan Gale knew his business and would bite Hutchison's head off he tried any of the crap he tries with people who are a little weaker?

The guy is a bully and like all bullies he's a coward. At least Wilson stands by agendas and stands on her two feet a little in the paper, on this car crash of a show and on offsiders. Hutchison acts like has the whole 9 network behind him to fight for him.

Brendan Gale has the intellect and obvious oratory skill to deal with hacks like Hutchy. i thought he was very polished, not to mention adept at deflecting questions he didn't want to answer. His reference to the 'master narrative' was inspired, straight from the corporate playbook. I got the impression he didn't rate any of them. And, let's be truthful, why would he?
 
Hutchy's finest last night was when Caro had just started to call him out again, yet just before she got going he proclaimed, "choose your words carefully". Or else what Hutchy?
How funny was it was Caro said that some journalists apologised for their error with the reporting the Wallace issue...then she paused for a few moments and said "and some obviously chose not to".

Wonder how long Hutchy took to come up with the term "overwhelming probability"...surely that means what 99%???
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Is it just me but does hutchya smug face really P**S you off? i'm not a fan or Caro but everytime i see hutchy i get so upset and the crap that spills out of his mouth,

must be a way to get rid of this guy without switching of FC because i do enjoy the show.
 
I just wonder why whoever it is , is wasting bullets on the Cloke home, when there is a perfectly good target in Hutchy !

Tht "man" and I use the word loosely, shat himself last night when Richo stared him down. I was never going to watch it again, but I heard Richo was going to be on the panel.
Riewoldt asked a perfectly fair question with regards the "fact" and typical Hutchy trembled and came back with his same old bullshit line.
 
I can't see what the problem is with Hutchy reporting football stories. Players and coaches need to be held accountable for their performances and actions and all Hutchy is doing is exposing the details of them.
He treads a fine line between reporting facts and 'rubbish' and I am sure he is aware of the subsequent repercussions and legal implications should he report lies.
To date I have not heard anything to suggest he has deviated from the facts on the Richmond story and if the players don't like him reporting facts them stiff sh*t. If the Richmond players did their job as well as Hutchy then perhaps they would not be the laughing stock that they are...
 
I can't see what the problem is with Hutchy reporting football stories. Players and coaches need to be held accountable for their performances and actions and all Hutchy is doing is exposing the details of them.
He treads a fine line between reporting facts and 'rubbish' and I am sure he is aware of the subsequent repercussions and legal implications should he report lies.
To date I have not heard anything to suggest he has deviated from the facts on the Richmond story and if the players don't like him reporting facts them stiff sh*t. If the Richmond players did their job as well as Hutchy then perhaps they would not be the laughing stock that they are...

But he didn't report the facts. He published that Terry Wallace had been sacked. He was wrong.

No matter how he tries to retro-fit the facts or rationalise it, he got it wrong in his zeal to break the story. For my money, a journalist with integrity would have admitted that rather than resort to weasel words.

If you're interested, check out Gunnar's recent post on the 'media watch' thread (post 110). He makes some interesting points, particularly about online journalism.
 
I can't see what the problem is with Hutchy reporting football stories. Players and coaches need to be held accountable for their performances and actions and all Hutchy is doing is exposing the details of them.
He treads a fine line between reporting facts and 'rubbish' and I am sure he is aware of the subsequent repercussions and legal implications should he report lies.
To date I have not heard anything to suggest he has deviated from the facts on the Richmond story and if the players don't like him reporting facts them stiff sh*t. If the Richmond players did their job as well as Hutchy then perhaps they would not be the laughing stock that they are...

Yeah exactly. But if other people would prefer to be fed rubbish like "er, um, we were just discussing our on-field direction" and never know the truth then that's up to them. :thumbsu:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I reckon we all need to give this guy a break.

The poor bugger is morbidly obese, ugly, ******ed, is losing his hair, his hygeine is deporable, he has a phobia of admitting he's wrong (because if he admits he's a poor journo he officially is good at nothing!) and has never had any loving relations with a female.

C'mon lets be nice.
 
I reckon we all need to give this guy a break.

The poor bugger is morbidly obese, ugly, ******ed, is losing his hair, his hygeine is deporable, he has a phobia of admitting he's wrong (because if he admits he's a poor journo he officially is good at nothing!) and has never had any loving relations with a female.

C'mon lets be nice.


So those are his good points.

What are his bad ones?


.
 
Love her or hate her, at least Wilson brings something to the table.

She brings shite to the table and not much more than Hutchy........all she has is opinions based on hope and no sources.....read her articles and listen to her carefully....no substance.

Hutchy can be annoying but at least he has some form of substance....even if his tactics are questionable.
 
She brings shite to the table and not much more than Hutchy........all she has is opinions based on hope and no sources.....read her articles and listen to her carefully....no substance.

Hutchy can be annoying but at least he has some form of substance....even if his tactics are questionable.

So Wilson 'brings shite to the table and not much more than Hutchy'. And while 'Hutchy can be annoying... at least he has some form of substance'.

I'm confused, who, in your opinion, brings more to the table as a journalist?

Is that you Hutchy?
 
I've been watchin' SBS on Monday nights so I haven't caught too much FC'09.

Last year I thought that Caro was tolerable. She was a shill, a mouthpiece for Ddrian Dunderson and Vlad DemetriDOH - but tolerable, okay. Her usual beat is the business side of the clubs and the AFL; and any "controversy" that raises its barbaric bonce/human head.

Crotchy, on the other hand, is an overbearing, overblown, overtalker. A mannerless, microphone thrusting, gutter crawling gasbag, even if he was right about TV Tan Terry and the Tempestuous-Teapot Tiggers.

In some circles, overtalking and a lack of manners passes for intelligence. It may take 3 generations, but I'd expect Natural Selection to come to bear.
 
He is an 'agent provocateur' and not a very good one. Footy Classified has become a total b....'ch session between him and Caro, ca't watch it anymore, the guy is a joke, and should be dropped.
 
Caro is just as bad, has a very nasty streak, and her constant coach bashing is pathetic, her hatred of Eddie is appalling between her and wallsy Mick does not stand a chance, hope CFC keep him on just to nark them.
 
Does Daniel Kerr need a visa or something to come and play in Victoria for a Victorian based side? Has he been rejected? I am still waiting on hutchy's 'fact' of Daniel Kerr to come and play for a vic based side. He said that was 'fact' last year so many times in the one breath, so it must of been true. Is Daniel Kerr walking here from perth? whats taking him so long?

IMO, hutchy is losing credibility day by day, the more garbage he talks, the more hair and credibility he loses... This Terry Wallace story is a complete balls up, and is an easy target for him, so he went with it. I have gone as far as going and getting my self a drink or changing the channel for 5 minutes now while hutchy is on, I only watched it this week on the footy show as richo was on it, and he seemed pretty fired up. Would be good if richo really did wack him in the head, knock some sence into him...
 
=grizzlym;14642726]I'm confused, who, in your opinion, brings more to the table as a journalist?

I am sure you are confused but I will explain for you..........Wilson deals in opinion (hers only) usually with weak foundation and speculation. Hutchison is not too much better but works higher up in the gutter than Wilson.

He does, however, provide facts to his reporting on more occasions than Wilson does, as Wilson reports her opinions in a manner that insinuates she is factual. Still confused?

I will clear it up for you further, both are shite journalists.........but Wilson just a little more so!:D
 
I am sure you are confused but I will explain for you..........Wilson deals in opinion (hers only) usually with weak foundation and speculation. Hutchison is not too much better but works higher up in the gutter than Wilson.

He does, however, provide facts to his reporting on more occasions than Wilson does, as Wilson reports her opinions in a manner that insinuates she is factual. Still confused?

I will clear it up for you further, both are shite journalists.........but Wilson just a little more so!:D

Sorry, I found your initial reply confusing because of the apparent contradiction. Never the less, we forge ahead... So, is this your basic contention: Wilson brings more shite to the table than Hutchy. But Hutchy's shite is of higher quality?

Personally, they both s*** me for different reasons, but if you had to make me choose who irritated me less I would say Wilson.

As for Hutchy working higher up in the gutter, can't agree with that. His 'reporting' of the Terry Wallace sacking was the apotheosis of gutter journalism. Even better than the previous benchmark he set in broadcasting baseless alegations about Justin Kositschke.

Personally, when Wilson opens her mouth on Footy Classified there's more likelyhood of something intelligent spilling from her mouth than Huthcy's.
 
grizzlym;14647186]So, is this your basic contention: Wilson brings more shite to the table than Hutchy.

No....both bring equal amounts of shite and it's ALL shite!:D

But Hutchy's shite is of higher quality?

Close ...but here is the crux.........Wilsons shite is not really hers, she has taken a little bit of shite here and a little bit of shite there and moulded it to her liking and makes it look like unreal shite! Whereas Hutchison (in most cases) takes shite that really is shite ..............and presents it as shite!:D

Personally, when Wilson opens her mouth on Footy Classified there's more likelyhood of something intelligent spilling from her mouth than Huthcy's.

Unfortuntely for me, when Wilson does open here mouth most things just spill out.:)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Craig Hutchison

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top