Cricket things that annoy you

Remove this Banner Ad

BBL teams all wearing the same uniform design wise. Understand that its a nike template, but can we get some variety pls nike


couldn't agree more.

the uniforms this season for starters have so much black in them (especially when every teams secondary colour is black) - very hard to read the names and numbers on their shirts. most teams have previously worn pants and batting pads as their primary colour.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

On a semi-related note, my vets team played a club recently with grey/black tops. Most of the blokes wore matching shorts rather than whites. I noticed that (on our home ground) a few of the outfielders blended in with the trees which surround the ground. Surely this is cheating? Most of us O-50s have enough trouble seeing the outfield already!
 
Juggled catches over the boundary rope.

If you catch the ball, then toss the ball in the air so you can go over the rope, you should have to get back into the field of play before you can touch the ball again to complete the catch.

Jumping in the air from the wrong side of the rope to keep juggling the catch while you get back into the field of play is stupid.
I'm old enough to remember the days when players could actually lean on the fence to take a catch.

However the stupid part of that was the laws of the game at the time still forbid a player to run over a rope (if the ground was roped off) once the catch was taken or in the action of completing the catch.

So, you could lean on the fence to take a catch - but you couldn't run over the rope once (or in the action of) taking a catch.
 
If they banned all the bolded, limited support staff to only concussion tests and the allotted drinks breaks then they could actually punish the fielding team properly for slow over rates. As it is, half the time is batsmen “gardening”, taking on/off gloves between balls (Warner), wandering off to square leg for some fresh air and the bowler is standing ready to go
What staggers me is when a player is hit on the helmet. They know there is a good chance they will have to change the helmet, but do they ever bring one out? Nope, water bottles, doctors asking how many fingers they're holding up, etc. After all that, they then take a look at whether the helmet needs to be replaced, then we wait while they run another one out.

I wish I could recall details of an incident a couple of years ago, but it resulted in a batsman lying on the ground, pads removed, while he received treatment. In the meantime, players standing around sucking on their drink bottles, looked more like a family BBQ than a cricket match.

We have rules that allow a batsman to retire hurt and resume his innings later. At what point should the umpires be intervening and telling the batsman unless he can resume batting immediately, he must leave the ground? Umpires really need authority to keep the game rolling.
 
I know it is standard procedure now but I do miss the days of a player getting hit whether it be on the helmet or elsewhere and making a quick self assessment and just taking guard again. It didn’t ALWAYS mean he wouldn’t receive treatment but generally a player would have a good idea of whether he was on one side of ‘hurt’ or the other.

I can recall during the momentous Bridgetown knock in 99, McGrath hitting Lara as he tried to get under a bouncer that kept a bit low and hit the visor, he ended up on his backside and there was a quick exchange of words. He bounced to his feet and I think drove the next ball for 4.

Steve Waugh did some similar things after being struck in the ribs by Ambrose at various stages four years prior and I think now it would almost be mandatory for a physio to do an inspection of some sort
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I know it is standard procedure now but I do miss the days of a player getting hit whether it be on the helmet or elsewhere and making a quick self assessment and just taking guard again. It didn’t ALWAYS mean he wouldn’t receive treatment but generally a player would have a good idea of whether he was on one side of ‘hurt’ or the other.

I can recall during the momentous Bridgetown knock in 99, McGrath hitting Lara as he tried to get under a bouncer that kept a bit low and hit the visor, he ended up on his backside and there was a quick exchange of words. He bounced to his feet and I think drove the next ball for 4.

Steve Waugh did some similar things after being struck in the ribs by Ambrose at various stages four years prior and I think now it would almost be mandatory for a physio to do an inspection of some sort
I remember Ponting getting hit in the mouth once and then telling everyone to piss off.
 
gotta be the 'bat flip' - so gimmicky.

any chance we can get someone to flip it properly eg. heaps of spinning rotations and thrown in front of them rather than a flying saucer and landing anywhere.
That's not the only gimmicky thing about the BBL.
Even allowing for the fact that it's (up to) 40 overs of slogging, I'd find the BBL a lot more palatable if it didnt have the gimmicks and American style razzamatazz.
 
gotta be the 'bat flip' - so gimmicky.

any chance we can get someone to flip it properly eg. heaps of spinning rotations and thrown in front of them rather than a flying saucer and landing anywhere.
What was wrong with a 🪙? Too simple?
 
when bad weather is forecast say for days 3,4 & 5.

why can't we start 30 mins earlier on days 1 & 2 and stay in front of the game (i know rain may not come even if projected, but all it would do in any case is shorten day 5 - smallish crowds on day 5 in any case).
 
Why do security staff have to puncture beach balls when they confiscate them? Why can't the balls be given to toy libraries, local swimming centres or kindergartens instead of being turned into more unnecessary landfill?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Cricket things that annoy you

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top