buddy-love
Debutant
He didnt even shake Pace's hand after the game. Even when Pace had earlier apologised. Pace is not a nasty footballer. it was out of the ordinary for him.
-
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
D2 D2 Ammos 2008
- Thread starter koby01
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
He didnt even shake Pace's hand after the game. Even when Pace had earlier apologised. Pace is not a nasty footballer. it was out of the ordinary for him.
table tennis
Bigfooty class clown
Would that make him worse than the bloke that whacked him??? i think not. do the crime, suffer the consequences. but the VAFA should take out the players giving evidence at the tribunal. and make a decision themselves from the umpires version and players version of events. The defendant should not have to take time out of thier lives to go to VAFA headquarters to give irrelevant evidence. I didnt see the incident before people go nuts on here, im talking about every incident.
redandtheblue
Debutant
obviously it would be handy for bentleigh if pace isnt out there.
really have fallen in a hole down at arthur st, now sitting on the bottom of the table.
a player who kicks 5 goals is someone that bentleigh would prefer not to have to deal with in trying to get the season back on track.
Ive always thought a new suspension system should be used in the AFL where players get rubbed out for future games against the club that they were reported against. it would simply advantage that opposition side next time they play rather than giving an advantage to whatever side is playing them next round.
a lot of people may not agree but in my eyes it would make some sense.
really have fallen in a hole down at arthur st, now sitting on the bottom of the table.
a player who kicks 5 goals is someone that bentleigh would prefer not to have to deal with in trying to get the season back on track.
Ive always thought a new suspension system should be used in the AFL where players get rubbed out for future games against the club that they were reported against. it would simply advantage that opposition side next time they play rather than giving an advantage to whatever side is playing them next round.
a lot of people may not agree but in my eyes it would make some sense.
Then teams would deliberately take out the opposition's best players during finals, and not have to face any consequences until a regular Home & Away match the following season. Or in the case of VAFA, may never face the consequences if they don't play that team again due to promotion/relegation.
So Barry Hall gets to play everyone except the WCE for the next 7 years. That makes sense!
Are you living overseas??? No net?? Your mum says Hi
Michael Yawn
Rookie
Congratulations. You are now leasding the most moronic post stakes. What naive & infantile mind would come up with that idea? Clearly a product of the Bentleigh FC. I said earlier your boys were no good. 'bout time you started believing it.
buddy-love
Debutant
Are you sayin you saw it then Westy? What exactly did he do to warrant 4 wks?!?
table tennis
Bigfooty class clown
Quite possibly the dumbest non-thought out comment ever posted in this board. Forensics should be out to your place to see what your on! They have the send off rule for a reason. You might realise that a suspension the next week can be quite a costly penalty. Just ask Jason Cloke and Jason McCartney.
Why not go one step further.......if the incident only happened in the first quarter, suspend him for first quarters only, or if the incident occured when he was playing FF, suspend him from playing FF.
Seriously if what you said makes 'some sense in your eyes' then there is something chronically wrong with your eyes, and it seems to have spread to you brain as well. You have 6 months at best.
Did not witness the incident at point of impact but saw the aftermath. No need to get whacked for no reason. Head is sacrasant hence the 4 weeks.
EddietheEagle
Senior List
what was the aftermath, was an ambulance called? blood rule? stretcher?
table tennis
Bigfooty class clown
I would have said 3. Your very generous Akka
javo23
Senior List
if pace dont get four weeks the tribunal is disgraceful blatant forearm straight to the head
Just bring back the biff!
redandtheblue
Debutant
sorry for throwing the suspension idea out there guys. as I said a lot of people might not agree and I was right on the money there. look at it this way, if its such a rediculous idea then thats right up the AFLs alley. how about I change the scenario: if the suspended player receives more than a 1 week ban they miss games over the next "x" amount of weeks, as well as not playing the next time the 2 sides meet. probably still wont win any fans on here (expecting more criticism again) and I guess the system is fine in the end, but the AFL do love changing rules just for the sake of it.
on a more realistic note, is everyone training flat out over the break, using it for a bit of rest time or even using it as a chance for a different type of activity rather than the usual training? Im sure some of the much older blokes see it as a time for some rest as the youngsters continue to run right through...
on a more realistic note, is everyone training flat out over the break, using it for a bit of rest time or even using it as a chance for a different type of activity rather than the usual training? Im sure some of the much older blokes see it as a time for some rest as the youngsters continue to run right through...
knackers22
Debutant
Angelo Pace, Ivanhoe. Striking, 2 matches.
*Liam Collier, Therry Penola. Striking, 2 matches.
*Liam Collier, Therry Penola. Striking, 2 matches.
I think you're flogging a dead horse R & B. Changing the tribunal - Just what the AFL needs, more rule changes.
How do you know he got "whacked for no reason" if you didn't see the incident?!?! Is it not conceivable to you that head-high contact could occur on a footy field without it being someone getting "whacked for no reason"? Next time someone gets head high contact in a marking contest should their opponent automatically get 4 weeks?
No, he played most of the rest of the match and didn't appear restricted (and no doubt will play the next 4 matches too).
Really contradictory comments unless I'm missing something? When you were initially asked what Pace did you said you didn't witness the incident and only saw the aftermath.... but now you're saying that it was an elbow to the head after the ball was given off.
Is that what you were told at training last night?
Hmm interesting question Nixon? What would be the reasoning for them going other than location. And then it throws up another question, will one team in D2 that's being relegrated be saved if Paradians leave the comp? Like to hear some feedback on this
- Status
