Look out for Roberts and Gibson.
TIP: Rhodes gets frustrated very easily
Bob and Mel?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Grand Final
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Look out for Roberts and Gibson.
TIP: Rhodes gets frustrated very easily
Rhodes Schmodes... Nuske Schmuske
If I'm umpiring the Ressies there are more important things to worry about...
Oh... And if I remember correctly (but I may be confusing Mt L with BC here) the coach there stands on an elevated platform? This shows really poor sportsmanship in my opinion. (Bulleen you know what I'm talking about...)[/quote]
Oh.....Why is that
Look out for Roberts and Gibson.
TIP: Rhodes gets frustrated very easily
Oh.....Why is that
Is there any competition in footy where one teams coach gets to have a better view of the game than the opposition? Pretty obvious I would have thought. I'm guessing its not illegal, but it is poor sportsmanship. IMO anyway...
Is there any competition in footy where one teams coach gets to have a better view of the game than the opposition? Pretty obvious I would have thought. I'm guessing its not illegal, but it is poor sportsmanship. IMO anyway...
Waz,
Please tell me you are joking. The most stupid thing I have read today. At your own ground you will do anything that gives you an advantage. If the coach sits on a raised platform then so be it.
Here's a thought, take your 2 grand and build a coaches platform - pretty f%*king simple.
Is there any competition in footy where one teams coach gets to have a better view of the game than the opposition? Pretty obvious I would have thought. I'm guessing its not illegal, but it is poor sportsmanship. IMO anyway...
Instead of a bench we could get a row of tennis umpires chairs?
Anyway, its just my opinion. I figure home ground advantage comes from knowing the surface, the size of the pitch and the elements that help or hinder teams throughout the match. Getting a supportive crowd along certainly helps...
Maybe you just put them up on a pedestal, and it's all in your own head?
There should be a height limit on coaching staff, too. That giant from Kew should be made to watch games seated, or kneeling at best.
Is there any competition in footy where one teams coach gets to have a better view of the game than the opposition? Pretty obvious I would have thought. I'm guessing its not illegal, but it is poor sportsmanship. IMO anyway...
HaHa....Just wait untill you get a wiff of the sh!t farm next door, then you'll know what kind off home ground advantage we might have
Stupidest post of the year!!!
In relation to your first point - YES!! - The AFL!!
On Sat night Paul Roos coached from the bench and Worsfold sat in the stands.
Off the top of my head I can think of at least 10 grounds in the ammos where the home side have an elevated view. What club wouldn't want this!!
Maybe you just put them up on a pedestal, and it's all in your own head?
There should be a height limit on coaching staff, too. That giant from Kew should be made to watch games seated, or kneeling at best.
Are the goal posts inline this year?
Oh... And if I remember correctly (but I may be confusing Mt L with BC here) the coach there stands on an elevated platform? This shows really poor sportsmanship in my opinion. (Bulleen you know what I'm talking about...)
Oh Waz - you make me laugh on this one mate.... And at least we're wearing blue shorts this year so we don't clash with the umpires. and the umpires are also wearing fluoro colours in our games as well. (Pity for everyone that kicks to the opposition now - there's no bloody excuses any more!)
Also - our new coach isn't using the 'advantage' of elevation. So now if we win, we win fair. (Irrespective of what some have insinuated on here.)
Bout time!
So we can all agree that there is at least some advantage to be had? (Obviously my views are wrong on it being poor form. Duly noted.) In which case, is it poor form to build something specifically with that purpose in mind? Or would you be stupid not to?
So we can all agree that there is at least some advantage to be had? (Obviously my views are wrong on it being poor form. Duly noted.) In which case, is it poor form to build something specifically with that purpose in mind? Or would you be stupid not to?
So we can all agree that there is at least some advantage to be had? (Obviously my views are wrong on it being poor form. Duly noted.) In which case, is it poor form to build something specifically with that purpose in mind? Or would you be stupid not to?
So we can all agree that there is at least some advantage to be had? (Obviously my views are wrong on it being poor form. Duly noted.) In which case, is it poor form to build something specifically with that purpose in mind? Or would you be stupid not to?