Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Take his salary for one year off Gold Coast's books so they will trade 13 to us/the Pies instead of another clubWhy are we taking the rat? Makes literally zero sense.
No current season stats available
treasure chest with a turd stuck to the bottom of itPeter Ryan has edited his tweet to remove reference to Port's F1 so maybe we are just getting the whole treasure chest for Houston alone?
Ralph is reporting we are giving up our future first also.if we keep our future first in that suggested deal, then it works. If we are giving that up, then its terrible.
Overall it netted us Rozee and Butters too
Ralph is reporting we are giving up our future first also.
Makes sense given we kept space for the GWS free agents who never cameI'd assume we're just chewing up Rats and Lukosius salary and no longer giving a F1.
I would have been happy to work with North.
couldnt agree more. what a farking joke..John Cleese couldn't write a script where that absolute clown Ratkins could end up at Alberton.
If it does happen it's time burn the place to the ground and then get the biggest steam roller ever made to flatten anything still standing!
Got to make Dan happy.Well we did try. You could have taken our future first which would be somewhere between picks 2 and 4 because let's face it, even if we somehow managed to double our wins next year, that's where our pick would land. That would put you firmly in the frame for Dyson Sharp or it could have gotten you a couple of early picks in this years draft with a trade. Seems a lot better than this deal.
This club is ****ed if we do this. Atkins is on good money because good ol’ Gold Coast overpaid him. Luko is on a million each year for the next two years. We give up one of our best 5 players and a future 1st, after the garbage 1st we traded last year, and all we get back is 13, Luko, and some garbage.Ralph is reporting we are giving up our future first also.
Well we did try. You could have taken our future first which would be somewhere between picks 2 and 4 because let's face it, even if we somehow managed to double our wins next year, that's where our pick would land. That would put you firmly in the frame for Dyson Sharp or it could have gotten you a couple of early picks in this years draft with a trade. Seems a lot better than this deal.