Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Is pick 13 this year really ging to be better than pick 3/4/5 next year?Don't love it, don't hate it. F1 is overpaying for Luko if we are taking his full salary. And would still rather turn North's F1 into a couple of first rounders this year.
not to bad but the 29 should go to port as wellNorth lose: 2, 25, North F1
North gain: 6, 29, Houston
Port lose: 39, Port F1, Houston
Port gain: 14, North F1, Lukosius
GC lose: 29, Lukosius
GC gain: 39, Port F1
Richmond lose: 6, 14
Richmond gain: 2, 25
Thoughts on this?
North are happy, GC are happy, Richmond are happy. Is Port? Your F1 is probably around 16. North's F1 is probably around 4.
Nah - its good but its a gamble in what's being called a shit, compromised draft. Norf could go up the ladder, especially with another year in to Warlord, Sheezel etc, a soft fixture and Dan ****ing Houston. We've always said two firsts.Norths future 1st on it's own is good enough.
I see where you’re going with that.Just a reminder the last time we played hardball (Nick Stevens), the footy gods rewarded us the following season.
Don't bend over now Ports
Take Atkins as a salary dump but remove the future first. Only way the deal looks semi okay (ignoring the fact we just traded one of our best players to a premiership contender)They've come this far, they will find a way to get it done. This was always going to be reanimated. A better player than Atkins would help.
100%. Anywhere but with those f***ers.I really don't want Houston getting to Collingwood.
Maybe they can throw in Frampton.
Wouldn't do it for 13 alone. Something like 10 + 13 I'd go for - not sure how it gets done. Keeping North's F1 certainly not a bad outcome either.Is pick 13 this year really ging to be better than pick 3/4/5 next year?