Depends how much greyhound equity he has.Maybe we can finally delist Boak
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Depends how much greyhound equity he has.Maybe we can finally delist Boak
This is contradictory as we didn't hesitate to move our future first (this year's first) for depth players last year.
Football department is not aligned.
Melbourne are the benchmark now. Clarry pushed for a move to Geelong. Dees told him to get ****ed.The whole concept of port allowing/not challenging Houston when he said I'll stay if a deal can't be done then not accepting a F1 from North Melbourne doesn't sit right with me. Kane cornes was right (eww) the whole AFL industry isn't ruthless enough
Thanks this is the funniest post I've read this year. A late POTY contender, hilarious stuff.My guess on that front was that they saw getting Soldo, Rat, BZT etc as the final missing piece of the puzzle to what they deemed was a premiership list.
Just watch us pull another Moore out of the hat with that pick.It's a real shame we're going to lose an absolute jet, and the best we'll get is a speculative pick 13. Far out. We're going to need to absolutely nail that pick, and pull another Butters out of our hat.
It's criminal how much Houston has been under rated in the thinking around this trade. We really should be walking away.
My guess on that front was that they saw getting Soldo, Rat, BZT etc as the final missing piece of the puzzle to what they deemed was a premiership list.
The club should be ballsy and ask for Alan Didak just to **** with their heads again.
Is that what they offered? Do we know who pick 17 ended up being?He’d still be worth more than the Pick 17 and Steve McKee they offered for Nick Stevens.
Maybe they should've gotten some good players instead.My guess on that front was that they saw getting Soldo, Rat, BZT etc as the final missing piece of the puzzle to what they deemed was a premiership list.
I put this concept to someone at Port yesterday, and they snapped saying that the value of their future 1st is significantly less than a pick in the teens in this draft.
They believe that the quality of this draft is much, much better than next year, which is why they're likely going to give up a future 1 to get this deal done in the next week.
I personally don't agree with it, but that's the rationale of thinking down there.
Getting Rat was a good idea. Without him, we are an injury away rom Bergman on Hogan.Maybe they should've gotten some good players instead.
(apologies to BZT, he's alright)
Is that what they offered? Do we know who pick 17 ended up being?
The issue isnt how good or bad he is. His season came after the trade so cant be used in judging the trade.Getting Rat was a good idea. Without him, we are an injury away rom Bergman on Hogan.
People forget that his first half a season was very good, taking plenty of intercept marks and being moved forward and taking multiple contested marks. Fell off after that but not the dreadful season those with goldfish memory are making out. We still need him.
Which makes an absolute mockery out of keeping Ken.My guess on that front was that they saw getting Soldo, Rat, BZT etc as the final missing piece of the puzzle to what they deemed was a premiership list.
The same list they said was crap mid-season. They are really running a tight operation down thereMy guess on that front was that they saw getting Soldo, Rat, BZT etc as the final missing piece of the puzzle to what they deemed was a premiership list.
Unfortunately, Port are people pleasers.Like i posted yesterday, the only sensible thing to do is to work out a deal with North Melbourne, they have more to deal with and why in hell would we want Collingwood and Carlton to get stronger, seeing they are two clubs we will be competing with for a finals spot.
Once Dan said he wants out and that entails breaking a contract, Port must look after the club and get the best possible deal, if that means North so be it.
Face when Dan is playing for the opposition, we won't have any care factor for him and he won't hold back in trying his best when playing against Port.
Like I said when he sets foot away from Alberton he is then the enemy.
People continue to underestimate the shitshow position we are in.Unfortunately, Port are people pleasers.
Making a fellow finals contender stronger and granting a player their wish would be seen as a win within the walls of Alberton, where it's all about being good people as opposed to ruthless.
It's also why we watch on while other clubs taste the real success.
Since 2018 our strategy has been to trade next year's first and then next year trade players to get back into the draft, that will continue where in future players like Bergman and Butters are potential flight risks.Getting Rat was a good idea. Without him, we are an injury away rom Bergman on Hogan.
People forget that his first half a season was very good, taking plenty of intercept marks and being moved forward and taking multiple contested marks. Fell off after that but not the dreadful season those with goldfish memory are making out. We still need him.
The enemies within are trumping anyone smart enough to walk away at present lolLike I said when he sets foot away from Alberton he is then the enemy.