- Jan 20, 2015
- 3,272
- 6,268
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Don’t think there is any chance of 23 back. 29 at a stretch.Wrong way around, I reckon we are trading next year's first to the Gold Coast for Luko and their pick 23.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don’t think there is any chance of 23 back. 29 at a stretch.Wrong way around, I reckon we are trading next year's first to the Gold Coast for Luko and their pick 23.
You could say that about the relative salaries of many players.
In general salary distribution in AFL is a joke. The top players should be getting way, way more and the mediocre players should be getting way, way less.
If we accepted pick 2 from NM, I suspect it would be because we've already lined up a trade to split it into 2 later picks.Unsure what we want from north.
I don’t see their future first as being anywhere near enough, too much risk it ends up being pick 8 alone. Why do that for Dan ?
Don’t want pick 2 alone either, don’t rate the top end of this draft that much that I would take just one pick.
Would tell north to get us 2 1sts with at least one being top 12. Happy for either both in this draft or one in the future is fine as long as we have one in this draft.
If Gc accept 23 for Luko then 13, Luko, Richards isn’t the end of the world, its passable
If Gc accept 23 for Luko then 13, Luko, Richards isn’t the end of the world, its passable
Agreed, a lot hinges on the currency GC will require.
I don't know why we can't just loop into the Noble + Future 1st for 13 + 23 part of the trade and make it a 3 way:
Port Out: Houston
Port In: 13, Lukosius, Richards
GC Out: 13, Lukosius
GC In: F1 (Coll), Noble
Coll Out: F1, Richards, Noble
Coll In: Houston
Possibly because Houston behind the scenes is pushing a lot harder for Carlton than Collingwood?
Doesn't seem enough, could we maybe throw in Butters to Carlton as well? Richmond should probably jag Georgiades out of it too honestly
That's the worst one yet.
Chris Davies has been very clear that he’s not giving up Houston for less than what he’s worth. Effectively three clubs trying to come up with the best deal with Davies saying he’s in no rush - if they’re clever they’ll let it run down to the last day of the trade period. Dan not nominating a club was fantastic for us - not sure how you can fault the way this is playing out.Not comparable. Hinkley's comments this year "maybe we're not good enough" and Davies denigration of the list shortly thereafter to try and justify their continued positions as the most unsuccessful coach in VFL/AFL history and General Manager of Football is nothing compared to supporters critiquing or taking out frustrations on a footy forum.
GC said no to the Pies, for F1 + Noble offer for their 13 &23, said it was worth 13 only.Agreed, a lot hinges on the currency GC will require.
I don't know why we can't just loop into the Noble + Future 1st for 13 + 23 part of the trade and make it a 3 way:
Port Out: Houston
Port In: 13, Lukosius, Richards
GC Out: 13, Lukosius
GC In: F1 (Coll), Noble
Coll Out: F1, Richards, Noble
Coll In: Houston
Possibly because Houston behind the scenes is pushing a lot harder for Carlton than Collingwood?
No reason to think Melbourne couldnt come back in either. Or even another side with a leftfield play. There are 10 clubs in VictoriaChris Davies has been very clear that he’s not giving up Houston for less than what he’s worth. Effectively three clubs trying to come up with the best deal with Davies saying he’s in no rush - if they’re clever they’ll let it run down to the last day of the trade period. Dan not nominating a club was fantastic for us - not sure how you can fault the way this is playing out.
Matthew No-ies.
The Port & North list managers get on very well together where all the JHF trade noises were from their feral supporters and not the North management team.At this juncture, no offer is satisfactory, so Dan is staying put as far as I'm concerned.
Would hang up the phone on Carlton's offer.
If the Wobblers said 13 + 23 + a future 2nd I'd be tempted. We could use the F2 for Luko. Then package what we get for Soldo with 13 to get a top 10 pick this year.
Get Richards separately with what we get by trading someone like Clurey or Williams out.
Leaves us with top 10, 23, 36 and late picks for matching any F/S's and Barrett (at least 2 F/S's will be rookies anyway).
Alternatively, we wrangle something better from North, who appear to be reasonable after the deal we both agreed to for JHF.
If Dan was OOC or had one year left and firmly stated Collingwood as his preference, then yep you'd probably say this is an OK dealIf Gc accept 23 for Luko then 13, Luko, Richards isn’t the end of the world, its passable
You can't really.Chris Davies has been very clear that he’s not giving up Houston for less than what he’s worth. Effectively three clubs trying to come up with the best deal with Davies saying he’s in no rush - if they’re clever they’ll let it run down to the last day of the trade period. Dan not nominating a club was fantastic for us - not sure how you can fault the way this is playing out.
I agree with this, even St Kilda could offload its contentious Battle pick, which is like a free hit and worth more than Carlton and Collingwoods offers.No reason to think Melbourne couldnt come back in either. Or even another side with a leftfield play. There are 10 clubs in Victoria
I'm hoping he is not posting here cause he has been told to stay hush on what day next week ken is getting sacked so he doesn't want to take any chances of it slipping out.How come he doesn't post here anymore