- Dec 11, 2009
- 31,928
- 41,215
- AFL Club
- Geelong
So which part of intellectual property are we dealing with then ?
Is Tim Kelly intellectual property to Geelong because we drafted him trained him now we want to own the results for longer 3-4 years. Or because this scenario suits geelong with Tim Kelly.
That's what a draft is the players have no choice of destination. They are the rules when you enter the draft you sign and fulfil that contract. Do you think a lot of those draftees wanted to get shipped of to gws or goldcoast. Imagine if gws worked under intellectual property.
Then after that players like any normal person in a business model gets to decide what they do with future employment. Don't forget this is a job a livelihood a career. Player welfare is very important in the modern game it's a new age.
Where you start your working career at the very beginning for around 90% of people isn't exactly where you want to end it. It's just the first step in a short career path in your life.
Players should be able to choose it not everything is going to work like joel Corey, harry Taylor, mitch Duncan & so on every now and then they backfire that's the risk you take bringing guys over with a young family who was widely tipped to go to west coast in the next few picks.
Intellectual property was just a term I used to convey what I was trying to say. Don't get too hung up on it.
I agree with what you say in general.
But in this instance either the GFC didn't ask enough questions, have severely misjudged the situation...... or Tim was deliberately vague about the fact he would bolt for the door at the earliest opportunity.