Vic Daniel Andrews and the Statue of Limitations

[Reg Grundy35]

are they in government

because if they are they are literally running the show

doesn't mean they are running it well but that is kind of what governments do Sttew

you really should just move on from this thread though because Dan isn't running the show anymore so arguing about the performance of Vic Labor in here is really just off topic at this point

yes that is some serious ownership. He's been gone for over a year!.

 

[FIGJAM]

What loss? last time i looked ALP were still running the show in Vic and the Libs were still shooting at each other?

The loss of a myriad of arguments around our COVID response.

I could give two ****s about politics; I with a few others, were interested in at least scrutinising some of the more draconian measures, the lengths and severity of lockdowns and Victoria's apparently limitless budget.

As an prime example, Dan taped up playgrounds like there was a murder there, all because he had a tantrum one day about parents getting too chummy at a safe distance outdoors, chatting over their flat whites while the kids played.

And if you dare questioned the Supreme Leader, you got made to feel like you being against the measure was that you were basically in favour of putting a flame thrower through every aged care facility in Melbourne.

This line of argument against those who were in favour of health measures (ie. we weren't anti-vaxxers), was relentless. And all the while all we asked for was a little measured scrutiny and have been proven to be correct in this report, various admissions by Sutton (who was used as a pawn) and via our eye-wateringly high debt.

 

[eddiesmith]

The loss of a myriad of arguments around our COVID response.

I could give two ****s about politics; I with a few others, were interested in at least scrutinising some of the more draconian measures, the lengths and severity of lockdowns and Victoria's apparently limitless budget.

As an prime example, Dan taped up playgrounds like there was a murder there, all because he had a tantrum one day about parents getting too chummy at a safe distance outdoors, chatting over their flat whites while the kids played.

And if you dare questioned the Supreme Leader, you got made to feel like you being against the measure was that you were basically in favour of putting a flame thrower through every aged care facility in Melbourne.

This line of argument against those who were in favour of health measures (ie. we weren't anti-vaxxers), was relentless. And all the while all we asked for was a little measured scrutiny and have been proven to be correct in this report, various admissions by Sutton (who was used as a pawn) and via our eye-wateringly high debt.

Plus their endless obsession with trying to prove without any success of how easily it spread outdoors, even to the point of one day claiming the only point of contact was passing someone in the street before having to backtrack the next day when it turns out they’d been indoors for hours with a positive case…

 

[Gralin]

Checks calendar
October 2024

 

[Festerz]

I could give two ****s about politics

Give it a rest Janet.

 

[FIGJAM]

Give it a rest Janet.

Some might be offended, but I'm wrapped that the Labor Party Shill has finally responded to a post of mine!

 

[FIGJAM]

Plus their endless obsession with trying to prove without any success of how easily it spread outdoors, even to the point of one day claiming the only point of contact was passing someone in the street before having to backtrack the next day when it turns out they’d been indoors for hours with a positive case…

Oh yeah! The old "fleeting contact" backtrack.

None of the comic stylings associated with our response happened in the other states...

 

[FIGJAM]

Checks calendar
October 2024

It's a friendly reminder to you especially Gralin, that in the next health crisis, those who have a measured scrutiny on things might not be insubordinates, but might actually have some valid points.

 

[Ghost Patrol]

Checks calendar
October 2024

Conservatives are happy to lock up refugees for decades, but can't handle a few months of soft lockdown during a pandemic.

 

[Gralin]

It's a friendly reminder to you especially Gralin, that in the next health crisis, those who have a measured scrutiny on things might not be insubordinates, but might actually have some valid points.

This is you being friendly?

 

[FIGJAM]

This is you being friendly?

After you hurled abuse at me and then banned me form one of the Dan threads, it's the best I could muster.

 

[Gralin]

After you hurled abuse at me and then banned me form one of the Dan threads, it's the best I could muster.

Oh I don't think there's anything friendly about your posting

Definitely some obsession that you can't move past but you're not alone look at how much traffic this thread gets