Daniel Wells as sub , yeah or nay

Remove this Banner Ad

Decisions like this are the definition of 'high risk, high reward'. It can pay dividends i.e Cyril Rioli in last years grand final, but can also backfire heavily. I reckon Wellsy can be the difference and if he trains hard enough, why not take a punt!
Cyril had been out for half as long and barely touched the ball!

He's not fit. It's as simple as that.
 
No.

He needs to be cherry ripe for next year.

Absolutely tip top.
It's too early to be worrying about next year. I'll do that when we drop out of the finals

Having said that, if he's sub you'd have to be confident he could play at least 3 quarters if we cop an early injury and if you're confident of that, why make him sub?
 
Wells is a professional athlete for sure and footy's a game that demands courage and the willingness to put your body on the line, but he has also broken his body playing footy for our enjoyment. Like all players we should give a shit about his (and their) long term welfare. If anyone can guarantee his body can hold up and he can run out most of a game then play him. If we're just adding to short and long term injury then no way. If he's ok by the GF maybe...

And what jay Z said.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I love Wells more than most but history is littered with teams taking underdone players into finals at it not working out.

Wells has played 3 half games and got hurt in all 3.

I hope he does not play.
The most recent being Cyril in the Grand Final last year. That turned out terribly!

But yeah, I agree with you. As much as I'd love to see Wellsy back it's a massive risk!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Daniel Wells as sub , yeah or nay

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top