![](https://images.bigfootymedia.com/icons/mobile-bullets/port_adelaide.png)
The less you say the less you incriminate yourself.Has he been heard from in weeks? Usually this last month would be his perfect opportunity to pot the supporters.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 24
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
The less you say the less you incriminate yourself.Has he been heard from in weeks? Usually this last month would be his perfect opportunity to pot the supporters.
Remember when we had AusGold as a sponsor then it turned out to a scam? Lmao.
This was just before Koch's time, but I can recall a sponsor (Myatm?) that had a female director named Fifi or Kiki (or something like that), who looked like she had lost her job as a Las Vegas showgirl in the 1970's and hadn't been employed since.
I believe they didn't pay us either!
Sally Zou came on board as part of our China venture sponsor and to help fund playing in China. She came on board in October 2016 after the first China game was scheduled. She was a schizo.Remember when we had AusGold as a sponsor then it turned out to a scam? Lmao.
The less you say the less you incriminate yourself.
Hinkley is the huffer.Davies and Richardson are the glue.
It's almost like the board has gagged him so he doesn't put his foot in his mouth again.
Financially the Club has never been in a stronger position than it is now.
Record levels of revenue, half a dozen million dollar PA sponsors, no debt with the AFL and very little debt on the books in general (will be cleared in the next 2 years). The footy department has all the necessary financial resources to compete with the top Clubs. Facility wise, they've just built their new high performance centre, have announced a redevelopment of the Bowls Club (in addition to other developments at Alberton), and their long term vision to build a retail/medical hub between Alberton Oval and Port road will make the Club recession proof.
Koch deserves criticism for his oversight of the footy department. But he has done a ton right when it comes to the off-field ventures.
Great post. You’ve answered my question nicely.
So after a decade, we are in a place where we should never return to the ‘tarps’ and Koch and team and others should get much of the credit.
Great post. You’ve answered my question nicely.
So after a decade, we are in a place where we should never return to the ‘tarps’ and Koch and team and others should get much of the credit.
The problem is not where we are now, but where we could have been.
This regime has plateaued seven years ago. We are going through the motions.
This is correct. But at the same time, they deserve complete criticism for hitching their wagon to the Hinkley/CD ticket.
I'd suggest Hinkley and CD plateaued - the off field ventures particularly the last few years have grown exponentially.
I also know that having Tredrea on the Board and the footy committee has created a new healthy dynamic where football decisions are being discussed rather than dictated.
It's why I'm optimistic if they can get the right people running the footy dept once Hinkley and CD go (most likely by the end of this year), they'll have as good a chance as any going forward.
I can't look at football and think that we are great, but for that. We may be better, but I don't believe we are compartmentalized. There are serious issues lingering on.
In brief, numbers may look good, but they are built on the same BS we see in the football department. It's unsustainable.
This is correct. But at the same time, they deserve complete criticism for hitching their wagon to the Hinkley/CD ticket.
I'd suggest Hinkley and CD plateaued - the off field ventures particularly the last few years have grown exponentially.
I also know that having Tredrea on the Board and the footy committee has created a new healthy dynamic where football decisions are being discussed rather than dictated.
It's why I'm optimistic if they can get the right people running the footy dept once Hinkley and CD go (most likely by the end of this year), they'll have as good a chance as any going forward.
From the outside it seems Davies is a very good communicator.I have absolutely no idea how he has hoodwinked the board into positioning himself as a can't do wrong expert on all things footy. It beggars belief.
I am comfortable however knowing that Tredrea is in the same room as CD and is asking the pertinent questions to hold him to account, and hopefully wake up some of the Board members.
From the outside it seems Davies is a very good communicator.
He's certainly got the gift of the gab. That being said, a lot of what he says is absolutely bullshit. Consistently tells anyone and everyone that "my program is elite."
Just astounds me that there are intelligent people on the Board who haven't been able to ask the question of "well if you're program is 'elite' as you say, Chris, why haven't we got the results to reflect your subjective opinion?"
I’m blown away that this is happening if you’re saying this is mainly CD. Whatever gift of the gab he has it says a lot about who’s surrounding him and how they got there.I also know that having Tredrea on the Board and the footy committee has created a new healthy dynamic where football decisions are being discussed rather than dictated.
I’m blown away that this is happening if you’re saying this is mainly CD. Whatever gift of the gab he has it says a lot about who’s surrounding him and how they got there.
How have you concluded that the off field achievements/ventures of the Club are unsustainable?
I've never wanted a Wookiee to more right in my life.It's why I'm optimistic if they can get the right people running the footy dept once Hinkley and CD go (most likely by the end of this year), they'll have as good a chance as any going forward.
They aren't Port or football people so they simply don't care is what it basically comes down to for a lot of our board. It's a checkbox, it's fun when we are up and about and results on field don't matter to them.Because too many of them subscribe to the little battler club mentality and the myth of pre 2013 Port being a perennial cellar dweller rather than a traditionally strong club who spent a few years rebuilding.
It's because the ex-morning TV show buffoon and his board of accountants and a disruptor have zero understanding of what a successful professional sporting organisation looks like. They "look at the data" but are incapable of drawing any relevant information from it. Davies is probably the one telling them what the data means. He can point to Hinkley as being the "most successful coach of the club's AFL era" as proof that his program is elite.He's certainly got the gift of the gab. That being said, a lot of what he says is absolutely bullshit. Consistently tells anyone and everyone that "my program is elite."
Just astounds me that there are intelligent people on the Board who haven't been able to ask the question of "well if you're program is 'elite' as you say, Chris, why haven't we got the results to reflect your subjective opinion?"
Good call the big problem with Port is that people are in the wrong positions, doing the wrong jobs.Financially the Club has never been in a stronger position than it is now.
Record levels of revenue, half a dozen million dollar PA sponsors, no debt with the AFL and very little debt on the books in general (will be cleared in the next 2 years). The footy department has all the necessary financial resources to compete with the top Clubs. Facility wise, they've just built their new high performance centre, have announced a redevelopment of the Bowls Club (in addition to other developments at Alberton), and their long term vision to build a retail/medical hub between Alberton Oval and Port road will make the Club recession proof.
Koch deserves criticism for his oversight of the footy department. But he has done a ton right when it comes to the off-field ventures.
As TeeKray said: "Because too many of them subscribe to the little battler club mentality and the myth of pre 2013 Port being a perennial cellar dweller rather than a traditionally strong club..."
And I don't trust professional b*llsh*tters.
Big call to make such an opinion on the basis of a hunch with no actual objective data supporting this.
Plenty of data to suggest they have no idea about putting together a footy department, but off the field, all the evidence suggests they've got a long list of achievements that they deservedly should be credited for.
Yeah, he's done a good job off field but he's lost all that goodwill and more by poking members directly in the eye as an unelected President and completely screwing up the footy department for the last 7-8 years. That along with no willingness to publicly commit to giving control back to the members it seeds discontent and doubt in the members/supporters. I'd also like it if he sold us more instead of under selling us, we are a massive club, in global sport terms, not just in Australia.Big call to make such an opinion on the basis of a hunch with no actual objective data supporting this.
Plenty of data to suggest they have no idea about putting together a footy department, but off the field, all the evidence suggests they've got a long list of achievements that they deservedly should be credited for.