Traded Dayne Beams and pick 67 traded for picks 5 and 25, and Jack Crisp

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brisbane.

The club that decided Christensen was worth more than Beams.

And to think he could have been yours tonight if you had only offered 5,21 and 25.

Anyway enjoy your so so player with a bad back from Geelong.

Priceless.

P.S-We'll now go shop him to the suns and giants and come away with a better deal.

Thanks!

What are GWS and GC going to give you?
 
Brisbane.

The club that decided Christensen was worth more than Beams.

And to think he could have been yours tonight if you had only offered 5,21 and 25.

Anyway enjoy your so so player with a bad back from Geelong.

Priceless.

P.S-We'll now go shop him to the suns and giants and come away with a better deal.

Thanks!
Mhmm.

5 + 21 + 25 for Beams

Or 21 for Bundy.

Yeah, I know which one I like and its the one we got.

5 + Greenwood is fair for Beams, what a shame your arrogant club can't see it.
 
8+15>>>5+25

Is it though? In your view receiving the lethal injection is better than pick 5 given the history of previous players drafted at that spot. Surely pick 8 is far worse and 15 basically worthless?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

No.

The Club decided that Christensen was worth 21. And Beams was worth 5 + 25. The math isn't that difficult surely.

Roy, you need to keep it simple mate, remember who we are dealing with here.

You are spot on though.
 
greenwood isnt your player...heck is that hard to comprehend.

Hence why we trade a better pick to North than you can offer to gain him for you on your behalf, and you get a player who can replace Beams for you...

heck is that hard to comprehend.
 
Has an individual player been traded for three picks inside 25 before? FMD. This Dale Beams guy must be the best player in the comp.
 
Has an individual player been traded for three picks inside 25 before? FMD. This Dale Beams guy must be the best player in the comp.

He wasn't being traded for 3 picks. It's not too hard to work out.
I'll go slowly for you if you need it explained.
 
He wasn't being traded for 3 picks. It's not too hard to work out.
I'll go slowly for you if you need it explained.

Poster(s) in this thread deem 5, 21 and 25 to be an equitable deal.

To not facilitate a compassionate trade over a 9 pick upgrade in the second round is pretty low, nonetheless.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Mhmm.

5 + 21 + 25 for Beams

Or 21 for Bundy.

Yeah, I know which one I like and its the one we got.

5 + Greenwood is fair for Beams, what a shame your arrogant club can't see it.
What a shame that your rabble of a club can't see it isn't.

Let's put it to a poll shall we.

Who would you prefer Beams or Christensen?

Just think little old pick 21 was the only thing standing you between you and an elite A grade midfielder.

Enjoy your Geelong midget
 
Hence why we trade a better pick to North than you can offer to gain him for you on your behalf, and you get a player who can replace Beams for you...

heck is that hard to comprehend.


you poached Beams (err tried too I should say) so you should be coughing up a satisfactory trade.

however you are trying to use the "deep pockets / short arms" approach. you could be celebrating his signature and have him in a Fitzroy/Bears/Brisbane jumper right now if you didnt c ock it up.

gws and pies now talking and contacting Beams in the USA. the ship might have sailed.
 
What a shame that your rabble of a club can't see it isn't.

Let's put it to a poll shall we.

Who would you prefer Beams or Christensen?

Just think little old pick 21 was the only thing standing you between you and an elite A grade midfielder.

Enjoy your Geelong midget

Not bitter at all?

Its funny looking at the join dates of a lot of these Collingwood posters, they have all come out of the woodwork filled with rage :)
 
What a shame that your rabble of a club can't see it isn't.

Let's put it to a poll shall we.

Who would you prefer Beams or Christensen?

Just think little old pick 21 was the only thing standing you between you and an elite A grade midfielder.

Enjoy your Geelong midget

At least we acknowledge where our club is at, unlike you lot who loathe to use the words: rebuild, sliding, window closed. Next year will tell the real story.

What was they round 21 scoreline
 
What a shame that your rabble of a club can't see it isn't.

Let's put it to a poll shall we.

Who would you prefer Beams or Christensen?

Just think little old pick 21 was the only thing standing you between you and an elite A grade midfielder.

Enjoy your Geelong midget

At least we acknowledge where our club is at, unlike you lot who loathe to use the words: rebuild, sliding, window closed. Next year will tell the real story.

What was they round 21 scoreline
 
orig-21248955.jpg
<-Brissy + rest of negotiating parties
 
What a shame that your rabble of a club can't see it isn't.

Let's put it to a poll shall we.

Who would you prefer Beams or Christensen?

Just think little old pick 21 was the only thing standing you between you and an elite A grade midfielder.

Enjoy your Geelong midget

At least we acknowledge where our club is at, unlike you lot who loathe to use the words: rebuild, sliding, window closed. Next year will tell the real story.

What was they round 21 scoreline
 
[/QUOTE="Mavlions1961, post: 35635376, member: 95718"]Roy, you need to keep it simple mate, remember who we are dealing with here.

You are spot on though.[/QUOTE]
You need to employ a new mathematician.

Fast.
 
Clark - Geelong.
Beams, Christensen - Brisbane.
Pick 5, Pick 21, Greenwood, Varcoe
Pick 25 - North.
Clark, Pick 23 (Melbourne).
Lumumba, Pick 30 - Melbourne.
Exchange of 3rd & 4th round picks by some clubs.
Was agreed to by Coll, Melbourne & North.
Brisbane didn't agree.
Latest article.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top