
raskolnikov
Hall of Famer
I'd be happy for Richmond to win. It will probably be one of their few wins for the year.We support Melbourne against Hawthorne, Carlton, Richmond and Collingwood only
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 1
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
I'd be happy for Richmond to win. It will probably be one of their few wins for the year.We support Melbourne against Hawthorne, Carlton, Richmond and Collingwood only
All the more reason to support the DeesI'd be happy for Richmond to win. It will probably be one of their few wins for the year.
I’m trying not to like this but…I don’t know how to channel this in our death ride exactly … maybe know your enemy?
View attachment 2143258
Any deal with the Tigers will depend on if there is a deal to be done with North for pick 2. Tigers would maybe offer 6 & 18 . North will likely want 6 & 10. Could end up being 6 & 11 for 2 and a F2 as a guess. You are right as far as them wanting to spread the load but there will be a few interested parties.Really hope we end up keeping this pick.
My guess is that if Kako isn't bid on by pick 11 we trade Dees FF to Richmond.
Tigers should to swap two of their first 7 picks to the 2025 draft. I just hope we don't add a future 3rd as well.
That's the idea, and my guess would be there would only be a couple of players who may still be left after the Kako bid that we'd consider pulling the trigger on.Can someone explain the point of "trading back in"?
If Kako is bid on at 5 - 9, picks 28 + 31 + 40 are eaten up, bid on between 10 - 18 then 28 + 31 are eaten up.
What is the idea, Melbournes future first + pick 40 for a pick in the early teens ?
It is more if he is not bid on at 5-9. If we get to pick 10 and the Tigers still have it and 11 then we trade back in. Of course the Tigers may not have it by then.Can someone explain the point of "trading back in"?
If Kako is bid on at 5 - 9, picks 28 + 31 + 40 are eaten up, bid on between 10 - 18 then 28 + 31 are eaten up.
What is the idea, Melbournes future first + pick 40 for a pick in the early teens ?
Can someone explain the point of "trading back in"?
If Kako is bid on at 5 - 9, picks 28 + 31 + 40 are eaten up, bid on between 10 - 18 then 28 + 31 are eaten up.
What is the idea, Melbournes future first + pick 40 for a pick in the early teens ?
Can someone explain the point of "trading back in"?
If Kako is bid on at 5 - 9, picks 28 + 31 + 40 are eaten up, bid on between 10 - 18 then 28 + 31 are eaten up.
What is the idea, Melbournes future first + pick 40 for a pick in the early teens ?
Armstrong I’d hope.That's the idea, and my guess would be there would only be a couple of players who may still be left after the Kako bid that we'd consider pulling the trigger on.
Will be costly. That is my issue.I am not really a fan of trading back in after a Kako bid. I am more for trading back into a pick before Kako if his bid comes late.
Can someone explain the point of "trading back in"?
If Kako is bid on at 5 - 9, picks 28 + 31 + 40 are eaten up, bid on between 10 - 18 then 28 + 31 are eaten up.
What is the idea, Melbournes future first + pick 40 for a pick in the early teens ?
Another club would’ve made a “spite” bid. Trading back in will avoid this.I dont get why we would trade back in before a Kako bid having moved out to offset this possibility
I dont think I have ever seen one. History suggests academy bids nearly always fall. Even father / sons go later than expected. Only Jamara is one who was best available in the draft went at 1Another club would’ve made a “spite” bid. Trading back in will avoid this.
I dont think I have ever seen one. History suggests academy bids nearly always fall. Even father / sons go later than expected. Only Jamara is one who was best available in the draft went at 1
I dont get why we would trade back in before a Kako bid having moved out to offset this possibility
I come in peace.Doesnt have to be for anything other melbournes future first. Richmond may want to spread their draft hand over a few years to even out age profile on the list in coming years.
I come in peace.
Would it really be worth trying to trade back into the draft in the first round? I doubt it. North tried to trade their F1 for 13 and have not got a buyer yet. Everyone is saying next years draft is ordinary and it seems that the future picks are not holding a lot of value. With what teams are asking for round 1 picks seems excessive and I don’t think your F1’s will get a pick inside 20.
I suppose if a player you rate highly slips then it may be considered worth selling the farm for, else I think you take Kako and next best and take your F1’s to 2025. Thoughts?
Yes I think you’re rightSeems likely.
Like you said if present picks are overvalued and future picks undervalued may as well trade with value and hope to get lucky next year
I come in peace.
Would it really be worth trying to trade back into the draft in the first round? I doubt it. North tried to trade their F1 for 13 and have not got a buyer yet. Everyone is saying next years draft is ordinary and it seems that the future picks are not holding a lot of value. With what teams are asking for round 1 picks seems excessive and I don’t think your F1’s will get a pick inside 20.
I suppose if a player you rate highly slips then it may be considered worth selling the farm for, else I think you take Kako and next best and take your F1’s to 2025. Thoughts?