Constantgin
Norm Smith Medallist
its not too bad
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Completely agree with you... I'd support any team selecting a quality kicker out of college over a speculative 3rd or 4th string RB / WR who may not even make the roster at cut time.It's always an interesting option to cut the kicker when you don't actually have a decent option in your back pocket.
I know last yr wasn't Brandons best yr, but I don't think he was over the hill or so bad you cut him. I get it saved a few $, but I'd rather not have the $ right now and have the 4 points. For the amount of influence kickers have cutting them to save a few quid and get a cheap replacement is dumb as f. We aren't the only ones guilty of it loads of teams do it every year.
They should be drafted in the mid rounds more often than they are. You can't tell me drafting Justin Tucker with a 3rd round pick (if not higher) would be a waste. It might not be a fun or sexy pick but they score more points for their teams than anyone else - except the QB - so why would you not invest in them.
Very much hoping he just had a bad day. We can't finally sort out the line and have Russ come good, only to have the kicker losing us games.It's always an interesting option to cut the kicker when you don't actually have a decent option in your back pocket.
I know last yr wasn't Brandons best yr, but I don't think he was over the hill or so bad you cut him. I get it saved a few $, but I'd rather not have the $ right now and have the 4 points. For the amount of influence kickers have cutting them to save a few quid and get a cheap replacement is dumb as f. We aren't the only ones guilty of it loads of teams do it every year.
They should be drafted in the mid rounds more often than they are. You can't tell me drafting Justin Tucker with a 3rd round pick (if not higher) would be a waste. It might not be a fun or sexy pick but they score more points for their teams than anyone else - except the QB - so why would you not invest in them.
I suppose it's a position you don't really notice when they do their job well, but when they don't they very often cost their team games. How many missed XPs were there this week? I can't recall any other week with so many across the league.Completely agree with you... I'd support any team selecting a quality kicker out of college over a speculative 3rd or 4th string RB / WR who may not even make the roster at cut time.
Such an important position, and truly a player who can win or lose games off their boot.
Hopefully. But his 2 seasons with the Saints weren't exactly elite. Both worse than McManus in fact, and we dumped him. McManus fwiw takes a lot of kicks from outside 50 too so his stats look worse than perhaps they should.Very much hoping he just had a bad day. We can't finally sort out the line and have Russ come good, only to have the kicker losing us games.
The onside kick was a big bold statement, but ultimately nuts.
Wow, just watched. Diabolical. Both sides of the ball. Hard to fathom what changed from the first 30 minutes on. Discipline and decision making also all over the place. It's hard to recognise the current organisation as the Denver Broncos, as we've always known them.I didn't like the Vance Joseph hiring at the time and through 2 games it's looking worse and worse.
The offense certainly isn't without fault fwiw but the D looks woeful
Critical penalties in big moments seems to be a thing with our D. Losing Jackson hurt, our DB depth is fairly poor tbh, and while we've invested in our pass rush we don't seem to generate consistent pressure.Wow, just watched. Diabolical. Both sides of the ball. Hard to fathom what changed from the first 30 minutes on. Discipline and decision making also all over the place. It's hard to recognise the current organisation as the Denver Broncos, as we've always known them.
coughI didn't like the Vance Joseph hiring at the time and through 2 games it's looking worse and worse.
The offense certainly isn't without fault fwiw but the D looks woeful
It looks like a college score, it's insane.What the hell!?!?
And they could've had the highest ever NFL score by kicking a late FG, but decided to not embarrass us any further
- Fourth 70-plus-point game in NFL history (including postseason). The other three were the 1940 Bears (73 in the NFL championship game) the 1966 Washington team (72), and the 1950 Rams (70).
- Second-most yards in a game in NFL history (726) ... only the 1951 Rams (735) had more in the NFL record book.
- First team in NFL history with five passing TDs and five rushing TDs in a game.
- Second team in NFL history with multiple players with four TDs in a game (2004 Chiefs were the other).
- Second team since at least 1940 with 300-plus pass yards and 300-plus rush yards in a single game (the 2012 49ers also accomplished this).
- Ran 71 plays and averaged 10.2 yards per play -- the most yards per play by a team with 70-plus offensive plays ran since 1960
- Second-largest win in franchise history (beat Patriots, 52-0 in 1972)
- First 50-point win in the NFL since 2014 (Rams beat Raiders, 52-0)
- The final score was one never before seen in the NFL.
Especially considering the Bears gave some precedent sacking their DC last week.VJ needs to go just on principle alone.
The WilliamsbowlSome good news broncos play bears next week.